It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Once in office, we need Trump and Congress to seriously reevaluate the nature of our relationship with the UK.
originally posted by: xWorldxGonexMadx
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
originally posted by: xWorldxGonexMadx
a reply to: angelchemuel
If Charles was a real King, he would have put a stop to the invasion happening on the South Coast by now, in fact, this is something the Queen should have done in her time...
They have let the ENEMY in.
Before 1900, this wouldn't have been allowed I'm sure.. maybe even upto 1950 it wouldn't have happened.
The textile plant owners brought the asians over post WW2. They needed workers and asian would do the work. Those same textile plant owners wanted the work done a hundred years before and the Irish did the work back then. They didn;t give a monkey where the workers came from they just wanted the looms running 24 hours a day. Nothing to do with Kings and Queens, textile plant owners caused all this in their pursuit of dosh.
The Indians were fine and mixed properly...
The Bangladeshi's, Pakistani's, Somalians, Afghans and Iraqi's on the other hand... not so much... mostly those of Islamic Faith I'm referring to as the ENEMY!!
They even said they were coming here to rape the English Women and to turn the UK into an Islamic State but what do our Politicians do? They say we are Islamophobic if we say anything against it.
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: ufoorbhunter
The thing is, the victims of these grooming gangs tend to come from disadvantaged and neglected, white, working class backgrounds - the vast majority of politicians couldn't really give a # about them. No-one is beating the door down trying to speak up for them, get them justice and preventing other gangs from doing exactly the same to others.
If the victims were middle-class or from one of the 'special interest' groups there'd be hell to pay.
As to ending the US special relationship with the UK.
Under British law, when a pesticide is banned, the ban does not extend to its production or export. This leaves companies free to keep manufacturing these products in the UK to be sold in countries with weaker regulations.
“It’s deeply shocking that UK-based companies are shipping these most dangerous and deadly pesticides overseas where they can do huge harm to people and the environment despite being, rightly, banned here,” said Siân Berry, Green Party MP for Brighton Pavillion.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
Chlorinated Chicken?
Agent Orange?
Any takers?
Hatred will eat you up.
Not 😎 cool.
Rather than repeat authorisations for toxic chemicals, The Wildlife Trusts want to see British Sugar and the UK Government offer more support to transition away from harmful pesticides like these, which threaten the future of our farming and natural systems.
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Once in office, we need Trump and Congress to seriously reevaluate the nature of our relationship with the UK.
# off then.
With friends like you who needs enemies?