Musk calls on King Charles III to dissolve Parliament over Oldham sex grooming gangs

a reply to: xWorldxGonexMadx

Sure. Maybe.

But then you’d have to explain the rest of Europe and the US. And then the likes of China who doesn’t allow this kind of thing.

And then that one other country that is “expelling” people by various “means” left and right and actually is extending their borders, er, um, buffer zones.

The one that has all the “family” non-profits funneling foreigners into the US and other countries.

Damn. I can’t remember which one it is.

originally posted by: ufoorbhunter

originally posted by: xWorldxGonexMadx
a reply to: angelchemuel

If Charles was a real King, he would have put a stop to the invasion happening on the South Coast by now, in fact, this is something the Queen should have done in her time...

They have let the ENEMY in.

Before 1900, this wouldn't have been allowed I'm sure.. maybe even upto 1950 it wouldn't have happened.

The textile plant owners brought the asians over post WW2. They needed workers and asian would do the work. Those same textile plant owners wanted the work done a hundred years before and the Irish did the work back then. They didn;t give a monkey where the workers came from they just wanted the looms running 24 hours a day. Nothing to do with Kings and Queens, textile plant owners caused all this in their pursuit of dosh.

I see your point and it’s a valid one.

However I don’t think this is like that.

It’d be like saying the US used Chinese labor to build the railroads over a hundred years ago and then now letting in 20M+ people and then PAYING them off the backs of actual citizens.

So kinda different methinks.

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

Yeah it is sort of different yet many of the people committing these acts of terror against our girls actually come from a small segment of the asian community. Specifically muslims and from what was the very north of British India and now Kashmir, Pkistan.

We have many railroad asians too and our governemnt is sort of complicit in ntheir arrival. The British Empire used asians to build the Imperial railways in east Africa as the natives were hard to get any work out of. British empire asians were brought in and built those african railways, when the blacks turned on these railway workers post independence our government took these refugees in. One shouldn't confuse these people who are generally good workers and have gone on to found many successful businesses all over the UK with the asians from Norther subcontinent who were brought in to run the looms in the northern textile mills post WW2 and who have gone on to set up the grooming gangs in the post industrial textile belt of northen England.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: xWorldxGonexMadx

He's not really a "real King". He has very little actual powers.

Hirk back to the Kings of old and they never would have allowed it.

originally posted by: ufoorbhunter

originally posted by: xWorldxGonexMadx
a reply to: angelchemuel

If Charles was a real King, he would have put a stop to the invasion happening on the South Coast by now, in fact, this is something the Queen should have done in her time...

They have let the ENEMY in.

Before 1900, this wouldn't have been allowed I'm sure.. maybe even upto 1950 it wouldn't have happened.

The textile plant owners brought the asians over post WW2. They needed workers and asian would do the work. Those same textile plant owners wanted the work done a hundred years before and the Irish did the work back then. They didn;t give a monkey where the workers came from they just wanted the looms running 24 hours a day. Nothing to do with Kings and Queens, textile plant owners caused all this in their pursuit of dosh.

The Indians were fine and mixed properly...

The Bangladeshi's, Pakistani's, Somalians, Afghans and Iraqi's on the other hand... not so much... mostly those of Islamic Faith I'm referring to as the ENEMY!!

They even said they were coming here to rape the English Women and to turn the UK into an Islamic State but what do our Politicians do? They say we are Islamophobic if we say anything against it.

a reply to: ufoorbhunter

You're right, most of the people in these grooming gangs come from a specific region incorporating parts of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan and parts of Bangladesh who share a certain amount of cultural heritage.

Jack Straw and John Prescott voiced concerns over the numbers of immigrants coming into this country, both legally and illegally, from these regions and the detrimental affect it would have on UK society. They were ignored and Jack Straw was effectively removed from the government of the day.
Jack Straw was very vocal about these grooming gangs but he was shut down and vilified, even the Tory Party of the day refused to voice any support for him.

A few years later Sajid Javid was also demonised for speaking out about 'Asian paedophiles' and their grooming gangs.

The reason no major party will agree to a public inquiry is that they are scared to lose support within those communities. They would rather play their games of party politics than address the huge, #ing, big elephant in the room.

The thing is, the victims of these grooming gangs tend to come from disadvantaged and neglected, white, working class backgrounds - the vast majority of politicians couldn't really give a # about them. No-one is beating the door down trying to speak up for them, get them justice and preventing other gangs from doing exactly the same to others.
If the victims were middle-class or from one of the 'special interest' groups there'd be hell to pay.

Yes, there should be a full, open and frank Inquiry into these gangs and everything related to them.....I suspect it'd open up a few cans of worms to say the least.

But as for King Charles dissolving Parliament?
He can # off - Charles has no right or power to interfere in the governing of this land and as such should keep out of it.
The onus and responsibility should be that of those elected to represent the wishes and best interests of the British people, the Members of Parliament who have infested The Commons since these outrages were first publicly acknowledged.
It is down to them to force and Inquiry and if they don't then they are/were complicit in the whole stinking, horrid appalling affair and should be charged and judged accordingly.

a reply to: Freeborn

Well said.

a reply to: angelchemuel

He should release incriminating communications between these members.

originally posted by: xWorldxGonexMadx

originally posted by: ufoorbhunter

originally posted by: xWorldxGonexMadx
a reply to: angelchemuel

If Charles was a real King, he would have put a stop to the invasion happening on the South Coast by now, in fact, this is something the Queen should have done in her time...

They have let the ENEMY in.

Before 1900, this wouldn't have been allowed I'm sure.. maybe even upto 1950 it wouldn't have happened.

The textile plant owners brought the asians over post WW2. They needed workers and asian would do the work. Those same textile plant owners wanted the work done a hundred years before and the Irish did the work back then. They didn;t give a monkey where the workers came from they just wanted the looms running 24 hours a day. Nothing to do with Kings and Queens, textile plant owners caused all this in their pursuit of dosh.

The Indians were fine and mixed properly...

The Bangladeshi's, Pakistani's, Somalians, Afghans and Iraqi's on the other hand... not so much... mostly those of Islamic Faith I'm referring to as the ENEMY!!

They even said they were coming here to rape the English Women and to turn the UK into an Islamic State but what do our Politicians do? They say we are Islamophobic if we say anything against it.

That’s weird.

Sounds explicitly like a call to violence. Even worse, sexual violence. Maybe they should look into that?

I've heard it all before in the Oldham area. Worked there a lot, had my own run-ins with these people. Same thing over in Rochdale.

A friend of mine walked over to a takeaway in Rochdale a few months ago (he lived about 15 minutes away on foot).

Ordered a curry for himself and his family.

Upon leaving the takeaway he was attacked from behind by about three or four Asian men, all in hoods and had bats / knuckle dusters.

When he was down on the floor they were kicking his head etc. Until another man over the road seen it and shouted something, they ran off. The men in the takeaway came outside and helped him, phoned the police and sent him a new curry.

The police never turned up.

He was taken to hospital where he needed stitches etc.

Three days later the police phoned him and took a statement. Didn't visit his house.

They gave him a crime number and dajd they'd check cctv footage from outside the takeaway.

They did just that, but, the men were unable to be identified.

That was the end of it.

The police seemed more concerned with everybody else knowing about it in the areas as only a month before there had been riots in the UK about the immigration.

Back in my college days, I went to Oldham college. There was a number of problems with certain ethnic majorities there. They always wanted to date white girls and then bin them and marry their own girls once they had had their fun. Most were drug dealers and again the police wouldn't do anything about it.


Back to Rochdale. I was at Hopwood Hall college some years later. A mate of mine who lived in Oldham had a friend who worked in the police. He told me that their were gangs of lads driving around in cars with the isis flags in the back of them. But, the police had supposedly been told to leave them alone, because when they were pulled over, they would always play the racism card and put in a complaint against the police.

Ridiculous. The country is becoming overrun. And nobody in power seems to be doing or wanting to do a thing about it.

a reply to: twistedpuppy

Englanders don't have any problems butting their noses into our affairs over here in the US so I guess Elon or anyone else for that matter has a right to say what they please about your clusterf##k.

originally posted by: charlest2
a reply to: twistedpuppy

Englanders don't have any problems butting their noses into our affairs over here in the US so I guess Elon or anyone else for that matter has a right to say what they want about your clusterf##k.

I suppose you’re right. This IS true.

However.

It seems unless a country finds itself at war the US isn’t going to do anything but pony up taxpayer $.

We should probably look to our own houses getting in order before we cast stones. And sure it’s easy for Kekius Maximus to jive on what he thinks “should” happen.

But he ain’t exactly a traditional model to idolize either.

a reply to: charlest2

I have no problem with people from other country's passing comment on UK issues and affairs but it does help with one's credibility if the opinion offered is at least slightly informed.

If King Charles was to attempt to dissolve parliament it would cause a constitutional crisis the likes of which hasn't been seen since The Civil War.....and it would probably have the same result; the end of the monarchy.

Focussing blame on Charles only serves to detract away from those who actually caused and maintain this appalling situation.

a reply to: Freeborn

Well the reality as I see it there is that Charles wouldn't do anything even if he could because he is part of the problem there and the only way your Muslim problem is going to be settled is from the bottom up. It's not going to happen from the top down. The same bottom up solution to our problems over here.


What is funny and ironic about both our problems is they keep spewing DEI,DEI, DEI all the time both of our governments are importing the exact opposite of DEI. There is nothing at all DEI with the hoards being let into our countries. For you, the Muslim hoards are historically tribal Arab or African inbreeds that have no desire to be included into your society and are certainly anything but diverse and equitable. Basically the same with the hoards our government is importing. They have no desire to assimilate. They want to import their trash culture with them.

a reply to: charlest2

It's up to our rubbish Govt to fix it so quite what the obsessing about Charles is about I don't know.

What's your "bottom up solution"?

a reply to: Freeborn

"Yes, there should be a full, open and frank Inquiry into these gangs and everything related to them.....I suspect it'd open up a few cans of worms to say the least".

There absolutely should be one.

The Police and Social Services would be excoriated, and rightly so.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Your present king is a spineless globalist pile of excrement.

a reply to: charlest2

Thanks for that. I'm sure he would speak highly of you, too.

So, your solution is?

a reply to: [post=27527629]Oldcarpy2[/post

So, your solution is?

Get off your lazy a$$ and do something about it.

a reply to: Freeborn

All true, multiple council investigations have found the problem to be specific to second generational immigrants from specific regions in Pakistan and lawless border zones where Madrasas are numerous, in paticular followers of the Wahabi and Qut'bi branches of Islam.

I'm no fan of Starmer but he did introduce reforms to make sure ethnicity and political correctness should not get in the way of child grooming investigations and prosecutions back when he was director of public prosecutions.

Prior to the reforms police wouldn't even investigate the grooming gangs as the victims were usually highly vulnerable kids in care and police forces had the view they'd be drug addicts and sex workers anyway so protecting the kids from being gangraped was a waste of their time.