Musk calls on King Charles III to dissolve Parliament over Oldham sex grooming gangs

a reply to: Freeborn

I'm just saying that King Charles should hava a word with Government regarding the current crisis... surely he can do that and save the UK from this invasion and he must have the power to tell the current Government to send the boats back. He is the KING after all.

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

It seems unless a country finds itself at war the US isn’t going to do anything but pony up taxpayer $.

That's our modus operandi.
If we couldn't bribe, blackmail or threaten our allies we wouldn't have any.

a reply to: charlest2

"Get off your lazy a$$ and do something about it."

Like what, exactly?

It's just Elon cosplaying for his future role as King of the World .

Also Elon:

a reply to: xWorldxGonexMadx

He's not that kind of King mate , he probably welcomes them as much as the government , it's what Agenda 2030 wants.
Agenda 2030

This is why the face of our Countries is changing so rapidly , we are being diluted for purpose.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Do I have to put a ring in you nose and lead you? It's your country. Figure it out for yourself, if you can.

a reply to: charlest2

You are the one who claims to have a "solution"?

So, one more time, what might it be?

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: xWorldxGonexMadx

He's not that kind of King mate , he probably welcomes them as much as the government , it's what Agenda 2030 wants.
Agenda 2030

This is why the face of our Countries is changing so rapidly , we are being diluted for purpose.

I'm not going to read all that but just after a few paragraphs, this made me laugh:

Peace

"We are determined to foster peaceful, just and inclusive societies which are FREE FROM FEAR AND VIOLENCE. There can be no sustainable development without peace and no peace without sustainable development."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FREE FROM FEAR AND VIOLENCE!

From what I can see... it's gone completely the other way.

a reply to: xWorldxGonexMadx

We have a Constitutional Monarchy in which The Monarch has no real power, in effect he is a figure head.....nothing more.
Power ostensibly lies in The Houses of Parliament.

We either want our Monarch to stay out of politics or to be actively engaged in politics. We can't pick and choose when the Monarch of the day is right to intercede and when he shouldn't just when it suits one's personal preference.

I despise our politicians and personally believe our party political system is no longer fit-for-purpose......but I much prefer what we have rather than the alternative of an Absolute Monarch, we certainly can't have both.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Are you just playing stupid or just being argumentative for the sake of it?

Ask the French. They found a solution way back when. At the extreme if it comes to it, do torches and pitchforks on the steps of Parliament or Buckingham Palace sound feasible or appropriate to get the job done?

I need to be careful here or your Gestapo police will be coming after me for posting inflammatory posts. Far forbid anyone speaking their mind in your country.

Show me exactly where the views hurt you on this doll.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

a reply to: Athetos

They haven't.

Do you have a solution? Pray tell?

a reply to: charlest2

"Ask the French. They found a solution way back when. At the extreme if it comes to it, do torches and pitchforks on the steps of Parliament or Buckingham Palace sound feasible or appropriate to get the job done".

Nope. Next solution?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Nope. Next solution?

That retort was 100% expected.

I'm sure glad you lost the American Revolution.

a reply to: charlest2

Glad to oblige.

Any sensible solutions?

An eye opening 15 minutes from GBNews in relation to Oldham and the attempted cover up.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

None you would understand or accept.

I can see other members here jokingly saying, Charlest2 and Oldcarpy are at it again. They at it agin!

a reply to: charlest2

Try me?

Sensible and reasoned discussion would be nice?

a reply to: charlest2

We beat the French to it - like we have done with most things over the last thousand years or so.

We had a Civil War back in 1642 to establish the primacy of Parliament and that the monarchy has no say in the governing of this country.

Charlie's namesake lost his head over this issue, I suspect Charles may have learnt the lesson......or he better have done or else he's likely to go the same way.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Carpy, your little island nation is being invaded and conquered without ever the first shot even being fired and your government is facilitating it.