It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: putnam6
And yeah FB if Putin was such a menace, perhaps Europe shouldn't have been buying natural gas from him in the first place.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: putnam6
And yeah FB if Putin was such a menace, perhaps Europe shouldn't have been buying natural gas from him in the first place.
If we went back 10 years most people viewed Russia as coming around to not be a threat anymore. Even I who was in the Cold War viewed a new Russia that wanted to sell its energy and live more of a symbiotic state with the world and not be an aggressor as days of old. Back then I viewed China as the next aggressor, and then Ukraine happened and Russia of old peaked its ugly head out once again. Is it because Putin is growing old and his main desire all these years has been to get the 13 countries under the USSR back together again? I think so, but with no threat, he attacked Ukraine thinking it was going to be just another month of war with very few bullets fired, and he was so wrong and now is stuck.
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: putnam6
And yeah FB if Putin was such a menace, perhaps Europe shouldn't have been buying natural gas from him in the first place.
If we went back 10 years most people viewed Russia as coming around to not be a threat anymore. Even I who was in the Cold War viewed a new Russia that wanted to sell its energy and live more of a symbiotic state with the world and not be an aggressor as days of old. Back then I viewed China as the next aggressor, and then Ukraine happened and Russia of old peaked its ugly head out once again. Is it because Putin is growing old and his main desire all these years has been to get the 13 countries under the USSR back together again? I think so, but with no threat, he attacked Ukraine thinking it was going to be just another month of war with very few bullets fired, and he was so wrong and now is stuck.
Missing my point no doubt Im not being clear and concise enough, they still were members of NATO took NATO dollars they shouldn't have done anything to strengthen the country NATO was formed to protect against. Not to mention they bought NG from Russia throughout 2022 IIRC.
Half of this message board views Putin as a complete threat to Europe the non-Nato nations and NATO itself. When 3 years in Ukraine have proven the exact opposite. Yet America is to still spend billions to allay their paranoid fears and prop up Ukraine which has no blueprint for complete victory. IMHO it is complete BS
originally posted by: putnam6
Half of this message board views Putin as a complete threat to Europe the non-Nato nations and NATO itself.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Tolkien
You are the one that is obtuse and refuses to follow known good military strategies of the past 80 years that involved NO invasion and NO bloodshed.
There's already 1 million dead. You want more ?
I guess you missed the war's objective from the US point of view. The main objective is for this to be a war of attrition and devastating sanctions that leads to a regime change with Putin gone and with him goes his insane desire to get the old team back together like the days of old.
Your view is if Mexico invaded the south, you would just say, we do not want bloodshed so take back the lower half of the states there. Seems a little strange when we put it in that context, doesn't it?
Putin started this war and he could end it tomorrow. There is no win for him anyway. It would be still years more to take the country, massive sanctions are crushing them, the large food basket of Ukraine isn't happening, Russia's infrastructure is dying with zero Western support, and so much more. Then when he finally takes the country, if we do not put in air power that would end it too, the sanctions are still there and he would need to keep 3 million soldiers there to maintain the occupation. There is no win for him except to end it and just take Donbas and the land bridge to Crimea.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Tolkien
The point is i think you may be rather racist towards people who are not just like you.
But hey'ho if you wish to go around calling people, you obviously dont like, "savages" and tarring them with the same brush, go for it if it makes you feel better.
Ignore whatever you please, but the first step to dealing with a problem is recognising it exists.
They are not going to go away, especially when you want there stuff and resources.
And thats what first-world nations do that being consume the resources of third-world nations.
Its just how the cookie crumbles.
The question that Tolkien can't answer is where do you draw the hard line?
..... he attacked Ukraine thinking it was going to be just another month of war with very few bullets fired, and he was so wrong and now is stuck.
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Xtrozero
The question that Tolkien can't answer is where do you draw the hard line?
Exactly.If Ukraine had fallen in a few months - which it probably would have done without aid and support - Putin would simply have regrouped, reorganised his military, built up his armed forces and then invaded somewhere like Moldova.
Still unopposed he would have done the same with The Baltic States and who knows wherever else.
History has shown us time and time again that this is what power hungry dictators do.
Appeasing them does not work.
..... he attacked Ukraine thinking it was going to be just another month of war with very few bullets fired, and he was so wrong and now is stuck.
He has two hopes left; that his threat of using nuclear weapons works and/or that the US withdraws all aid and support.
originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
At this point best thing for Russia to do is claim a victory and move on however Putin wants to pitch it to his citizens '
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Tolkien
You did sign up for certain security obligations towards Ukraine, though?
No one wants a War with Russia, although Russia is constantly threatening the West with nukes.
originally posted by: Tolkien
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Tolkien
You did sign up for certain security obligations towards Ukraine, though?
No one wants a War with Russia, although Russia is constantly threatening the West with nukes.
The US and the West ALREADY gave $100s of BILLIONS, and THEY still lost the war.
Ukraine is so out of soldiers that they are kidnapping their own citizens off the streets.
Out of soldiers=war is lost
No one promised Ukraine a bottomless pit of money nor the lives of OUR citizens for THEIR war.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Tolkien
Lives of whose citizens?
Out of soldiers?
Then why does Russia have to get in NK soldiers and Yeminis?
No need to shout in capitals, I'm not deaf.
Europeans must be ready to sacrifice some “luxuries” to pay to support Ukraine and to prevent a “wartime scenario” coming to the nations of the continent if they are insufficiently prepared, NATO’s most senior military officer said in a speech namechecking both Russia and China as threats.