Tommy Robinson jailed again.

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

He libelled a 15 year old.

He then repeated the libel in defiance of a court order.

That is why he is in prison.

I would say that calling someone a bully is very subjective, wouldn't you? It's an option and not libel. For Brits to go down this path is a rather slippery slope.

a reply to: Xtrozero

He was charged with contempt of court and admitted 10 breaches of the high court order issued in 2021.

And again has an extensive criminal record.

Passing sentence, Judge Mr Justice Johnson said the breaches of the injunction, which prevented Yaxley-Lenon from repeating the allegations, were not “accidental, negligent or merely reckless” and the custodial threshold was "amply crossed”.

Judges tend to come down heavily on repeat offenders who choose to disregard the court's orders.

Those are just the facts.

You have to understand the mentality of the judge.

Like it or not he is sitting there with all the power and commands the respect of everyone in the court.

And some of them will go out of their way to illustrate the point in a heartbeat should you choose to disregard their ""advice"" or try and take the c word.

Anyone with a once of intelligence knows not to piss off the judge.

And that goes for barristers, prosecutors, witnesses, and anybody who happens to find themselves in the dock.

Tommy pretty much made it easy for them.

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: SprocketUK
He's in prison because the government didnt like what he said about that afghani kid.
He compounded this by doing it again in a documentary.


The government doesnt like it when the plebes don't do as they are told.


He's hardly the best bloke in the country but he isnt the criminal mastermind that the government wants to make him out to be either, he's just another example that there is only justice if you are one of them, the parasites in charge of the country.

He libelled a 15 year old.

He then repeated the libel in defiance of a court order.

That is why he is in prison.

did I stutter?

You certainly seemed confused.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

He libelled a 15 year old.

He then repeated the libel in defiance of a court order.

That is why he is in prison.

I would say that calling someone a bully is very subjective, wouldn't you? It's an option and not libel. For Brits to go down this path is a rather slippery slope.

That's not what he did.

a reply to: BedevereTheWise

"He libelled a 15 year old.

He then repeated the libel in defiance of a court order.

That is why he is in prison. "

You have no idea what you are talking about.

originally posted by: berbofthegreen
a reply to: BedevereTheWise

"He libelled a 15 year old.

He then repeated the libel in defiance of a court order.

That is why he is in prison. "

You have no idea what you are talking about.

Please enliten us all with your alternative facts.

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: SprocketUK
He's in prison because the government didnt like what he said about that afghani kid.
He compounded this by doing it again in a documentary.


The government doesnt like it when the plebes don't do as they are told.


He's hardly the best bloke in the country but he isnt the criminal mastermind that the government wants to make him out to be either, he's just another example that there is only justice if you are one of them, the parasites in charge of the country.

He libelled a 15 year old.

He then repeated the libel in defiance of a court order.

That is why he is in prison.

did I stutter?

You certainly seemed confused.

Only to your squinty little eyes maybe.

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: SprocketUK
He's in prison because the government didnt like what he said about that afghani kid.
He compounded this by doing it again in a documentary.


The government doesnt like it when the plebes don't do as they are told.


He's hardly the best bloke in the country but he isnt the criminal mastermind that the government wants to make him out to be either, he's just another example that there is only justice if you are one of them, the parasites in charge of the country.

He libelled a 15 year old.

He then repeated the libel in defiance of a court order.

That is why he is in prison.

did I stutter?

You certainly seemed confused.

Only to your squinty little eyes maybe.

I squinted so hard it made you blame the government for a libel case.

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: SprocketUK
He's in prison because the government didnt like what he said about that afghani kid.
He compounded this by doing it again in a documentary.


The government doesnt like it when the plebes don't do as they are told.


He's hardly the best bloke in the country but he isnt the criminal mastermind that the government wants to make him out to be either, he's just another example that there is only justice if you are one of them, the parasites in charge of the country.

He libelled a 15 year old.

He then repeated the libel in defiance of a court order.

That is why he is in prison.

did I stutter?

You certainly seemed confused.

Only to your squinty little eyes maybe.

I squinted so hard it made you blame the government for a libel case.

Well you squinted so hard it strangled the blood flow to your brain so that you thought that judges weren't an arm of the government and didnt do their bidding which we all know they are and do.

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: berbofthegreen
a reply to: BedevereTheWise

"He libelled a 15 year old.

He then repeated the libel in defiance of a court order.

That is why he is in prison. "

You have no idea what you are talking about.

Please enliten us all with your alternative facts.

The "child" you speak of was involved in numerous violent and racist altercations against native English kids. At times I believe involving not only actual violence but consistent and deliberate threats. He was in trouble with his school constantly for his behavior and many testified to it. However, your inane court system seems to only value a supposed moral high-ground and quite frankly cult like adherence to the idea that racism is a one way street. Because of this they neglected all evidence to the contrary of what was offered to them. Or possibly, they get nice checks from Qatar? Could be a combination of both. We all know how wealthy Brits romanticize about those they once lorded over.. Right? Right.

The "child" was not waterboarded at all, but was given a good smack by the brother of the female. The "child" upon losing the altercation was on the ground and then had some water from a plastic bottle of water splashed upon him. Somehow in your media that became waterboarding?

So basically a young muslim "child" was lewd and rude and threatening to a young lady and got called on it and lost and then had water splashed on him. That is all that happened to the wonderful "child".

Tommy Robinson then made a decent documentary with many witnesses and officials and sussed out the truth of the matter.

Problem is that your one percenter's (much like ours) could not possibly be wrong about anything ever, hate the working class for whatever reasons they have, (most likely superiority complex) and decided that anyone that offers any evidence contrary to their dictates need to be STFU.

You can believe whatever you'd like, but I think you best wake up because you are really a horses hair away from being ruled by actual religious fascist and you nor your family will be able to say no.

Arguably however, being muzzy might be better than being ruled by this weirdo trans clan that seem to be running the show these days.

BTW, if you'd like, and you have access to a VPN that attaches to a USA server, I can give you a link to the documentary. Be the first on your block to actually watch it, if you dare.

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: SprocketUK
He's in prison because the government didnt like what he said about that afghani kid.
He compounded this by doing it again in a documentary.


The government doesnt like it when the plebes don't do as they are told.


He's hardly the best bloke in the country but he isnt the criminal mastermind that the government wants to make him out to be either, he's just another example that there is only justice if you are one of them, the parasites in charge of the country.

He libelled a 15 year old.

He then repeated the libel in defiance of a court order.

That is why he is in prison.

did I stutter?

You certainly seemed confused.

Only to your squinty little eyes maybe.

I squinted so hard it made you blame the government for a libel case.

Well you squinted so hard it strangled the blood flow to your brain so that you thought that judges weren't an arm of the government and didnt do their bidding which we all know they are and do.

They aren't an arm of the government. It's pretty easy to look up how many decisions go against the government in UK courts. That's just a slightly paranoid claim used to try and excuse Robinson's actions.

This was a libel case brought by the 15 year Tommy decided to repeatedly libel.

He then ignored to court order and carried on repeating his claims.

Nothing to do with the government. He isn't in prison because of any government conspiracy against him. He is in prison becausec of his own actions.

originally posted by: berbofthegreen

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: berbofthegreen
a reply to: BedevereTheWise

"He libelled a 15 year old.

He then repeated the libel in defiance of a court order.

That is why he is in prison. "

You have no idea what you are talking about.

Please enliten us all with your alternative facts.

The "child" you speak of was involved in numerous violent and racist altercations against native English kids. At times I believe involving not only actual violence but consistent and deliberate threats. He was in trouble with his school constantly for his behavior and many testified to it but your inane court system that values the moral highground and quite frankly cult like adherence to the idea that racism is a one way street neglected all evidence to the contrary of what was offered to them.

The "child" was not waterboarded at all but was given a good smack by a female he accosted brother whom upon losing the altercation was on the ground and had some water from a plastic bottle of water splashed upon him.

So basically a young muslim "child" was lewd and rude and threatening to a young lady and got called on it and lost and then had water splashed on him.

Tommy Robinson then made a decent documentary with many witnesses and officials and sussed out the truth of the matter.

Problem is that your one percenters (much like ours) could not possibly be wrong about anything ever, hate the working class for whatever reasons they have (most likely superiority complex) and decided that anyone that offers any evidence contrary to their dictates need to be STFU.

You can believe whatever you'd like, but I think you best wake up because you are really a horses hair away from being ruled by actual religious facist and you nor your family will be able to say no.

Arguably however, being muzzy might be better than being ruled by this weirdo trans clan that seem to be running the show these days.

BTW, if you'd like, and you have access to a vpn that attaches to a USA server, I can give you a link to the documentary. Be the first on your block to actually watch it, if you dare.

You can of course provide proof of these claims because the actual court found them to be fake and libelous .

And by proof I don't mean a documentary by Tommy Robinson.

a reply to: BedevereTheWise

"You can of course provide proof of these claims because the actual court found them to be fake and libelous . "

Why don't you supply the proof? You keep saying, the court this and the court that as if no court is ever guilty of lording over people and F'ing people over for political reasons.

Is the court always right?

According to you, they are.

originally posted by: berbofthegreen
a reply to: BedevereTheWise

"You can of course provide proof of these claims because the actual court found them to be fake and libelous . "

Why don't you supply the proof? You keep saying, the court this and the court that as if no court is ever guilty of lording over people and F'ing people over for political reasons.

Is the court always right?

According to you, they are.

Please quote where I said courts are always right? Let me make it easy for you you can't because I didn't.

The proof is the court decision. If you want to show that decision to be wrong then I want more than claims from a convicted fraudster protesting his own innocence.

“When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.”



Nothing is an accident, in politics.

a reply to: BedevereTheWise


Well you certainly believe the court on this occasion. Please tell me what crime in particular that he committed to deserve the current penalty.

Not what the judge said, what is in the actual books.

I get that a judge didnt want him to release his film, and that he did it anyway. What law does that break? And if there is a law he broke, is that law reasonable?

Would you be ok if the shoe were on your foot? Say you made a video about how great Karl Marx was, and a judge said, "nope, you are not to be doing that and if you do - I will jail you!". Would you think that is reasonable? Would you find that law ok and go on into the prison knowing that you had actually done something wrong?

originally posted by: berbofthegreen
a reply to: BedevereTheWise


Well you certainly believe the court on this occasion. Please tell me what crime in particular that he committed to deserve the current penalty.

Not what the judge said, what is in the actual books.

I get that a judge didnt want him to release his film, and that he did it anyway. What law does that break? And if there is a law he broke, is that law reasonable?

Would you be ok if the shoe were on your foot? Say you made a video about how great Karl Marx was, and a judge said, "nope, you are not to be doing that and if you do - I will jail you!". Would you think that is reasonable? Would you find that law ok and go on into the prison knowing that you had actually done something wrong?

Contempt of court. That was easy any other questions?

Your analogy has nothing to do with this case as the original trial was libel, not a political opinion.

a reply to: BedevereTheWise


So, if you are ordered to not tell the truth about something. Then you just shut up right?

originally posted by: berbofthegreen
a reply to: BedevereTheWise


So, if you are ordered to not tell the truth about something. Then you just shut up right?

Also, what was the libel? Libel would mean that Tommy R is lying in the documentary about the "child" you are seemingly enamored with. Is that what happened? Who was libeled?

See, I know what the facts on the ground are, but I do not know what the court is doing and why they are doing it. Please enlighten me other than just going with "the judge decided". Why did the court charge him with libel. What are their arguments?

I doubt I would ever agree with them being an American (there is a reason we left you and this is pretty close to that reason).

originally posted by: Irishhaf
Dont know about the UK prisons but the US, other prisoners deliver the meals even when they are in solitary so if someone wants to get him they can still get got.

That is highly unlikely, if not improbable, at Belmarsh. They have a consistent record of accommodating opposing factions in the spectrum of terrorism and hate crimes. It is not just the prisoner themselves that is protected from the general population and the risks that they may pose to an ideologically espoused criminal but the threat that that prisoner poses to the general population.

Tommy is possibly in isolation and at Belmarsh simply because they want to keep him away from more vulnerable inmates, like many of the other inmates who hold fundamentalist beliefs at Belmarsh, who he might groom into his ideology. Hope for the best, but plan for the worst.

Belmarsh may for the most part be a high-security prison but in lesser part it is also a holding prison for London and the London courts which will be the primary reason he is being held there.

Of the choices available a risk assessment would have been taken and the best available option taken.

Beggars afterall are seldom chosers.

Tommy is locked up but he is also safe, in body at least.