The debate. Who wins?

a reply to: underpass61

What evidence is there for that underpass61?

originally posted by: underpass61

So cheating and lopsided enforcement of the rules is cool with you, good to know.

Very telling how you did not argue that fact.

Harris still said nothing with substance after weeks of drilling. Her whole platform is to give free money and make everything better even if it means a 180-degree flip as to what she lived her whole career and to become Trump 2.0.

It is funny how the Dems use the free money scam every election and never deliver anything. I remember under Obama when people were asked why are you voting for Obama many said "he is going to buy me a house".

No house, no 25k, no student loans paid off, maybe one-time 6k for firstborns...maybe, but let's double rent, food, gas etc, and call it good.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: underpass61
We already knew

What was talked about that hasn’t been all over the media?

You act like they pulled some surprise secret info out that Trump never heard of.

Just more excuses.

Actually they did just that. They gave the "Q" statements and questions to Kamala and her staff wrote all the necessary tangents and deflection. Trump was asked questions that Kamala wasn't. Start with the very first topic (economy) and how she immediately and quickly deflected and neutralized the entire subject. Only way that happens is with prior complete knowledge. Re-watch the first one minute of the debate and then say it was all above board. She had about 20 such "perfect" shots. 😊 Amazing how and why they had to cheat this so badly in order to "win". Enjoy your misery and bitterness. 🐱

originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: underpass61

Because he's always been one to fact check things he says if they support his claims.

I love how they didn't just tell her in a clandestine way nobody could trace, like on a burner phone. No, they took the extra step of printing out incriminating evidence the debate was being rigged and left it vulnerable to discovery. Really?

The genius from Penn buys that?

You really don't need some fabricated evidence to prove ABC baited him with fact checks. He didn't have to be all ideomotor and fall into their trap either.

He could have said,

"Why aren't you fact checking her too? How much they pay you to be here? You're supposed to be moderate. Unbias. Where is that? Im presenting what my data says are facts and youre job is to let people decide. So I'm calling you out now, because you're belittling my arguments and giving her a handicap!"

Or something along those lines. If he had the clutch gene he could've mopped up in real time. Could have used the nepotism against itself.

That's a really long-winded way of saying, as always, it's Trump's fault.

He should have known they would cheat - nevermind going after the actual cheaters.

Lame

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: bastion
Why would they have to leak/pre-screen questions? They were all incredibly predictable, boring and mundane topics that were obviously going to be asked and have been done to death for decades as far as I'm aware - was there a single suprise question or topic brought up during the debate?

Because the exact wording matters. Words matter.

That, and the fact she had all the perfect responses that perfectly fit the questions, and she answered fast. THAT is only possible when there's time to frame the words like they did. 😀

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: underpass61

What evidence is there for that underpass61?

Your eyes and ears.

Anyone who actually watched the debate could tell you that.

How many times was Harris fact checked?

And Trump?

originally posted by: xuenchen

Actually they did just that. They gave the "Q" statements and questions to Kamala and her staff wrote all the necessary tangents and deflection. Trump was asked questions that Kamala wasn't. Start with the very first topic (economy) and how she immediately and quickly deflected and neutralized the entire subject. Only way that happens is with prior complete knowledge. Re-watch the first one minute of the debate and then say it was all above board. She had about 20 such "perfect" shots. 😊 Amazing how and why they had to cheat this so badly in order to "win". Enjoy your misery and bitterness. 🐱

Annee is saying just excuses, but independent voters are not buying her whole performance, and that is really what counts. Harris and the moderators had it down pat for the economy. Ask the question, Harris deflects, they do no follow-up and move on.

originally posted by: xuenchen

That, and the fact she had all the perfect responses that perfectly fit the questions, and she answered fast. THAT is only possible when there's time to frame the words like they did. 😀

She also had the perfect bleeding-heart stories to tell with zero substance. Once again moderators would let her talk about some BS thing that had zero to do with the question and then move to Trump.

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: Annee

She was given the questions beforehand and assured that she wouldn't be fact checked.

Tell me in what world is that NOT cheating.

Oh yeah, Clown World.

Also the irrelevancy of asking Trump about Kamal's race when it was democrats who first pushed her as an India for Senator and then as a black chick for the presidency.

a reply to: underpass61

So no evidence.

And i did watch.

Harris was not coming away with the same sort of nonsense as Trump.

Whats wrong with fact checks?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: underpass61

Whats wrong with fact checks?

Applied unbiased and equally, they are fine.
That's not what happened in this case.

Trump was fact-checked five times and Harris none. There were several times where Harris should have been fact-checked; one primary example is the Charlottesville event where Harris lied about what Trump said. That has been debunked for years, by Snopes and other impartial assessments. Davis and Muir had to be well aware of that. But did he fact-check Harris? No, total silence. He let her lie to the country. Do you think for a minute he would have let Trump spread a similar lie?

Debate Moderators Corrected Trump But Let Harris Lie About Him

You're right, She wasn't spouting the "same sort of nonsense as Trump", hers was next-level BS.

a reply to: underpass61

Guess the 6th of November should be interesting.

Let's hope it's not raining cats and dogs.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: underpass61

So no evidence.

And i did watch.

Harris was not coming away with the same sort of nonsense as Trump.

Whats wrong with fact checks?

The moderators weren’t going to let what happened to Biden, in his debate with Trump, happen to Harris.
Linsey Davis, sorority sister of Harris, even admitted it….

“Davis, wearing pink glasses while speaking to The Times over breakfast at the Ritz Carlton in Philadelphia, said the decision to attempt to correct the candidates was in response to the June 27 CNN debate between Trump and President Biden, whose poor performance led to his exit from the race.

“People were concerned that statements were allowed to just hang and not [be] disputed by the candidate Biden, at the time, or the moderators,” Davis said.
redstate.com... 2179263

There’s nothing wrong with fact checks IF…

1) They are done to both candidates
2) They are factual

Those “moderators” fact checks were one sided, against Trump.
Their fact checks were false.

originally posted by: andy06shake

Glad you think it's funny

a reply to: RazorV66

As Oscar Wilde said, "You'd have to have had a heart of stone not to have laughed".

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: xuenchen

Actually they did just that. They gave the "Q" statements and questions to Kamala and her staff wrote all the necessary tangents and deflection. Trump was asked questions that Kamala wasn't. Start with the very first topic (economy) and how she immediately and quickly deflected and neutralized the entire subject. Only way that happens is with prior complete knowledge. Re-watch the first one minute of the debate and then say it was all above board. She had about 20 such "perfect" shots. 😊 Amazing how and why they had to cheat this so badly in order to "win". Enjoy your misery and bitterness. 🐱

Annee is saying just excuses, but independent voters are not buying her whole performance, and that is really what counts. Harris and the moderators had it down pat for the economy. Ask the question, Harris deflects, they do no follow-up and move on.

Sorority sis had kh’s back

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: underpass61

So no evidence.

And i did watch.

Harris was not coming away with the same sort of nonsense as Trump.

Whats wrong with fact checks?

The moderators weren’t going to let what happened to Biden, in his debate with Trump, happen to Harris.
Linsey Davis, sorority sister of Harris, even admitted it….

“Davis, wearing pink glasses while speaking to The Times over breakfast at the Ritz Carlton in Philadelphia, said the decision to attempt to correct the candidates was in response to the June 27 CNN debate between Trump and President Biden, whose poor performance led to his exit from the race.

“People were concerned that statements were allowed to just hang and not [be] disputed by the candidate Biden, at the time, or the moderators,” Davis said.
redstate.com... 2179263

There’s nothing wrong with fact checks IF…

1) They are done to both candidates
2) They are factual

Those “moderators” fact checks were one sided, against Trump.
Their fact checks were false.

Yep that is correct. Ms word salad may have suddenly developed a more articulate way of speaking with that earpiece… if one listens to her it sounds as if she is pausing mid sentence to get the next sequence.

originally posted by: EyeoftheHurricane

Sorority sis had kh’s back

The male mod is like besties too.

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: Annee

She was given the questions beforehand and assured that she wouldn't be fact checked.

Tell me in what world is that NOT cheating.

Oh yeah, Clown World.

Your proof?

Or just more unfounded accusations.