Nano bots in the vaccine

originally posted by: GaPeach30
a reply to: SteamyAmerican

What is a MAC address?

Good question.

I think it’s a simplified term for a designated combination of number and letters that can pick of Wi-fi.

But again. I’m not tech savvy so maybe someone else on here can explain it better. Or even how it applies to this thread at all in particular.

originally posted by: Dalamax
I’m with you SK. I declined the kind offer to participate and the consequences of participating are only of nominal interest consequently.

👍
a reply to: SecretKnowledge2

I mean, an experimental vaccine of all things and people put it in them.

And to see all the claims on here in this thread shows me a lot here have taken it.
I dont care what reason someone may have had for taking it, dont. ITS EXPERIMENTAL.

a reply to: SteamyAmerican


It is a unique identifier. en.wikipedia.org...

The ones emanating from humans, have a few peculiarities. the main one is that they are all unique and can change . 153news.net...

It would appear that even his antivaxxer friends are over his grifting bullsh1t.

originally posted by: SteamyAmerican
a reply to: chr0naut

I’ll pass your heroic insight to the families that have been harmed or lost a loved one.

Truly breathless take. Noted.

Your wisdom is damn close to suggesting I’m lying and didn’t actually view any video at all.

But yeah I agree the calamari clots they’re pulling from the veins and arteries of the deceased that took the jab look a little like transformers if you squint just right.

I wonder how many died of COVID because they didn't immunize against it?

originally posted by: SecretKnowledge2

originally posted by: Dalamax
I’m with you SK. I declined the kind offer to participate and the consequences of participating are only of nominal interest consequently.

👍
a reply to: SecretKnowledge2

I mean, an experimental vaccine of all things and people put it in them.

And to see all the claims on here in this thread shows me a lot here have taken it.
I dont care what reason someone may have had for taking it, dont. ITS EXPERIMENTAL.

I mean, experimental 'food cooked in fire' of all things and people put it in them.

And to see all the claims on here in this thread shows me a lot here have eaten it.

I don't care what reason someone may have had for eating cooked food, don't. IT WAS EXPERIMENTAL!!!! (millions of years ago).

LOL.

Is something still experimental if nobody is experimenting with it anymore, and it goes into common use?

originally posted by: antislogan

originally posted by: annonentity
The alternative media with regards to Dr Campbell and Dr Macmilan , have been holding off reporting on this strange twist until a well respected review had been done , it seems that it has to their satisfaction and thus they have reported. Here is Campbells assessment with some pictures of the structures which look like small circuit boards. Anyone following this will know that many have also noticed that there has also been a very high uptick in undesignated Bluetooth Mac addressee type signals emanating as it seems from vaccinated blood samples and individuals.

This video from 2013 describes the nanotech that was discovered by the scientists in the video: youtu.be...

And here's an article trying to deny that the technology even exists: apnews.com...

The TED talk is describing nano-tech.

Anything you can see with an optical microscope is micro-tech.

Nano-tech is too small to send or receive anything as large as 5G radio waves. It would be similar to suggesting that dropping a grain of sand in the sea will create ocean waves.

a reply to: GaPeach30

A MAC address is a unique identifier.

Think of it like a serial number for your hardware that accesses a network.

originally posted by: tarantulabite1

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: annonentity

This video has been removed by the uploader

How come?

Here is a link to his Other page that shows it's still up

Dr John Campbell - Nanostructures in Incubated Covid Vaccines
VIDEO

Also here is the Study he goes over
Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Peer review study - Study

Dif Video of someone else going on the study as well.

No professional immunologist, virologist, or vaccine specialist took part in the authoring of the linked paper used by ex-Nurse Campbell. The paper is by a gynaecologist-obstetrician and a linguist. Strange that a journal purporting to be specifically about virology is publishing papers by unqualified authors.

In the paper, it frequently uses all the cliché standard anti-vaxxer trigger-words and trigger-phrases, many of which are untrue.

The paper, Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructionsin Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study, is an utter joke:

They added all sorts of chemicals to the samples including various bleaches and other weird stuff like colloidal silver??

They observed the effects on human cells kept at body temperature for weeks to months. To quote the paper "We were limited to a maximum of 400X magnification. However, amazing self-assembling structures of great diversity became visible by about the fifth week of incubation ...the peak stage of full assembly was presumed to be around 2~6 months of incubation". (emphasis mine).

They make mention that most of the crud formed around the outside of the sample container (where crystals are more likely to be seeded and evaporation causes a concentration of salts, held in place by surface tension).

And the majority of 'structures' look like crystals forming (as would be expected since they actually added crystal forming chemicals) or are of desiccated cellular remains drawn to the edges of the container by surface tension and evaporative concentration.

Also, the "International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research" is a sham scientific journal created in 2021 at the height of the pandemic. Articles in the IJVTPR are not peer reviewed before publication. It is an "open journal" (whatever that is) that posts articles in the hope that someone will review the articles. It has been described as anti-vax fanzine.

Also, the disclaimer from the IJVTPR website:

"The information on the website and in the IJVTPR is not intended as a diagnosis, recommended treatment, prevention, or cure for any human condition or medical procedure that may be referred to in any way. Users and readers who may be parents, guardians, caregivers, clinicians, or relatives of persons impacted by any of the morbid conditions, procedures, or protocols that may be referred to, must use their own judgment concerning specific applications. The contributing authors, editors, and persons associated in any capacity with the website and/or with the journal disclaim any liability or responsibility to any person or entity for any harm, financial loss, physical injury, or other penalty that may stem from any use or application in any context of information, conclusions, research findings, opinions, errors, or any statements found on the website or in the IJVTPR."

a reply to: SecretKnowledge2

What are you doing when you choose to experiment with psychedelics SecretKnowledge2.

Do you, or have you always know, what is in that stuff or pill?

I certainly could not make the claim.

Plenty of people, point of fact, the vast majority of such have received multiple mRNA vaccines to the tune of around 70% of the population here in the UK, and they are just fine.

Maybe time to put the nonsense to bed.

The fact of the matter is that anytime we choose to introduce foreign agents into our bodies and bloodstream there is a risk involved because no two people are alike or the same for a start.

Crossing the street is a risk, same as just about everything we do in life, to one degree or another.

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: SteamyAmerican

It is a unique identifier. en.wikipedia.org...

The ones emanating from humans, have a few peculiarities. the main one is that they are all unique and can change . 153news.net...

Then how could billions of random unique numbers (apparently several per person) that change, be used to track anyone?

Seems to me that smart-speakers, mobile phones, and posts on social media are a far easier way to track people and know what they are thinking and doing.

a reply to: Euronymous2625


As far as it being generally accepted I have always said the bots will move on this to keep it throttled down.
Of course it is a step too far.....the problem is there is adequate proof to back it up. Thats why the patents were lodged.

Thats why certain members of this site must be thanked as they spend ridiculous amounts of their time in the debunking process, and move exceptionally fast, at the weirdest times in their time zones which is surely pointing to fact that certain threads must be debunked at all cost ...with of course using every tool in the classic debunkers box. Ad Homini attacks ...the op must be mentally ill etc. For them this has to be as counter productive as it gets as it highlights things which need greater scrutiny.

a reply to: annonentity

It's not hard to debunk doom porn that never comes to pass.

Especially when the doom porn you choose to punt, you fail to comprehend.

If you would just make that GP appointment tell him how you feel regarding the matters in question and get back to us with what he says.

That might make a great thread.

Why won't you go see a real doctor annonentity?

Ask yourself that question.

See what they say when you inform them you think everyone who received an mRNA vaccine is now magnetic and Bluetooth-enabled.

They won't lock you up or put you in some institution if that is your concern.

But they may well be able to help you with the likes of the delusions and paranoia you choose to entertain.

Via the likes of cognitive therapies or medication, possibly a combination of the two.

a reply to: chr0naut

The only sure method of tracking an individual is a personal chip inside their body , it can not be faked. All their movements can be checked , crime will just stop. They ca'nt spend more than their social credit allowance. Sounds great but it is too perfect that's the problem... perfect can't change and adapt it has no redundancy.

a reply to: annonentity

Humans dont create systems that cannot be circumvented annonentity, just a thought.

And where there is a will, there is a way.

FYI they already track you via the technology in that little black slab you carry about in your back banger or sit beside your bed when you sleep.

Why would they require expensive nanotech in viruses to do a job already being done?

And willingly no less by just about every clown on the planet.

a reply to: andy06shake


Like i said Andy it is a step to far.... and it is you who are spending an inordinate amount of time and effort in debunking something which you are on record as thinking is a hoax . I just report interesting threads and retain an open mind..

a reply to: annonentity

Going to the doctor to discuss what appears to be a rather legitimate and debilitating condition is a step too far?

How so?

My time is my own to waste annonentity, just like your own.

Do you believe the things you post, honest question?

An open mind is one thing mate but you still need to moderate what you choose to put in there and entertain.

a reply to: annonentity

I lost it at work on break when two coworkers were discussing getting the latest Covid booster. I flat out said they were insane if they got it because the vaxxes have proven to do nothing to protect you from getting Covid and are very possibly dangerous. I then said do whatever you want play Pfeizer roulette. I also said more people have died from the vaxxes than have died from Covid and that a 19 year old girl at the airforce academy just died. Was it from the vaxx? Well, sudden deaths among young people gave gone up dramatically.
Its a personal thing. The one guy's mother died two weeks after getting the vaxx while in a nursing home. My mother ended up in the same care facility after getting a pneumonia and flu vaccine and two weeks later came down with a staph infection of the spine. 6 months of hell later, she died. Beat the infection that was supposed to kill her but seizures of unknown origins and circulatory issues as a result did her in. A healthy woman in her 90s until those damn shots.
But no one in our family got the Covid vaxx and none had serious bouts with Covid. I had the loss of taste and smell for almost two weeks but it was like a cold. She tested positive for Covid and had a cough and runny nose, her 25 year younger roommate had the vaxx and was on oxygen for pneumonia when they were isolated together.
Don't get any vaccines, who knows what they're slipping into them now.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: SteamyAmerican
a reply to: chr0naut

I’ll pass your heroic insight to the families that have been harmed or lost a loved one.

Truly breathless take. Noted.

Your wisdom is damn close to suggesting I’m lying and didn’t actually view any video at all.

But yeah I agree the calamari clots they’re pulling from the veins and arteries of the deceased that took the jab look a little like transformers if you squint just right.

I wonder how many died of COVID because they didn't immunize against it?

I wonder how many died from Covid after taking the shot that doesn’t immunize you.

a reply to: andy06shake

Just got the news that a vaxed up mate who's perfectly healthy wife upped and got Leukemia, but died of a brain bled in hospital. Is now in hospital with liver cancer himself. You would have to be stupid not to put two and two together. Even if it is anecdotal at some stage the penny has to drop.