Nano bots in the vaccine

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: SteamyAmerican

"But to think we’ve gotten the whole story while they’ve tried to bury the findings for decades is legitimately concerning"

Decades?!!!!!

Yeah decades.

As in Big Pharma has worked diligently to withhold their own findings for 55 years.

a reply to: andy06shake

See andy. The thing is I’m willing to LISTEN to anyone that is trying to find out what has been forced on humanity.

Doesn’t mean I have to agree with them.

He isn’t bought and paid for so I could give a flip about his bona fides or credentials.

And I’m certainly more inclined to hear what someone has to say when they’re using the scientific method and critical thinking to try to reach conclusions rather than just bleating like the herd.

Ya know. Since this is the science and tech forums and all.

And while I’m thinking about it. Often times when I go to the dentist it is the “assistants” doing the work. Not the dentist. The guy with the DDS by his name.

So there’s that.

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

'"As in Big Pharma has worked diligently to withhold their own findings for 55 years."

About what?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Oh. Okay then.

I too posited something about it FWIW.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: SteamyAmerican

'"As in Big Pharma has worked diligently to withhold their own findings for 55 years."

About what?

THAT is the question, isn’t it?

Why would they need to seal their findings about the shot for 55 years?

Seems quite awhile if everything was above board.

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

The "shot" isn't 55 years old.

What do you mean "seal"?

55 years?

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

How about sugar?

That's something that's forced on humanity.

It's the same with salt.

I dont mind hearing it.

Swallowing it's another matter through.

And people still are not magnetic or Bluetooth-enabled.

So there’s "still" that.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: SteamyAmerican

The "shot" isn't 55 years old.

What do you mean "seal"?

55 years?

I’m not doing your homework friend.

Figure it out?

I’ve been rather explicit. And further grown tired of bringing things to the table in this thread that are immediately shot down without verifiable authority.

Pretty standard sometimes here unfortunately.

But yeah. What the shot contains, does, and actually is, is very much still in question. So there is that.

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

Homework?

Your claims.

You back them up.

That's how it works.

I don't have to back up your claims for you.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: SteamyAmerican

Homework?

Your claims.

You back them up.

That's how it works.

I don't have to back up your claims for you.

Here ya go.

Jesus.

ttps://www.reuters.com/legal/government/wait-what-fda-wants-55-years-process-foia-request-over-vaccine-data-2021-11-18/

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

Link not working?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Add "h" to the start of the URL.

www.reuters.com...

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: SteamyAmerican

Link not working?

Omg. Cut and copy? Or look it up yourself?

It ain’t a “claim” I’m making either. There are multiple sources to choose from regarding it.

This is why I don’t post threads. I’m not very tech savvy.

Apologies.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Add "h" to the start of the URL.

www.reuters.com...

Thank you.

I missed that and was confused myself.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

The mRNA vaccine technology itself has apparently been in development since the early 90s.

About 95 to be precise.

So near enough 30 years old.

It was supposed to help with the likes of HIV vaccines.

And there are indeed mRNA based HIV vaccines trialed if memory serves at various universities in the UK and around the globe.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

The mRNA vaccine technology itself has apparently been in development since the early 90s.

About 95 to be precise.

So near enough 30 years old.

It was supposed to help with the likes of HIV vaccines.

And there are indeed mRNA based HIV vaccines trialed if memory serves at various universities in the UK and around the globe.

Is there any speculation or medical/scientific reasoning that this will work for HIV or other viruses vs. old-school vaccines?

Just curious.

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

Yes, there are exciting developments in the realm of HIV vaccines, including the use of mRNA technology.

The University of Oxford, for example, has been at the forefront of this research, along with other institutions.

www.ox.ac.uk...

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

What is a MAC address?