It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Of course you do.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
"But if you are a psycho and you want to make headlines, you realize that our schools are soft targets. And we have got to bolster security at our schools. We’ve got to bolster security, so if a psycho wants to walk through the front door and kill a bunch of children, they’re not able."
Sounds like an invitation to me.
Very poorly worded.
I know the truth is hard for y’all . . .
I am not required to agree with you.
You do not define truth for me.
I agree with Sookie on this.
originally posted by: putnam6
Considering the parents knew of the FBI INQUIRIES certainly carry the bulk of the responsibility here.
But generally, until the core problems of mental health, bullying, and overprescribed child and teen mood drugs are addressed we will have incidences such as these. Still lots kids get bullied, lots of kids has mental health issues, but relatively few cross over to violent reactions.
The school administration has to be able to identify potential issues and have the authority and ability to counsel and or remove potential children who are struggling, right now they do not have the resources, training or legal recourse to preemptively remove a student.
additionally, there is a need for more robust forms of security.
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
Of course you do.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
"But if you are a psycho and you want to make headlines, you realize that our schools are soft targets. And we have got to bolster security at our schools. We’ve got to bolster security, so if a psycho wants to walk through the front door and kill a bunch of children, they’re not able."
Sounds like an invitation to me.
Very poorly worded.
I know the truth is hard for y’all . . .
I am not required to agree with you.
You do not define truth for me.
I agree with Sookie on this.
Then you tell me what he said that isn’t truthful? What do you not agree with in his statement?
What sounds like a invitation? What did he say in full context that you don’t agree with? Can you not answer that? Let me guess… he’s a conservative and you have to find fault in what he said no matter, right? Isn’t that how your mind works?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
Of course you do.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
"But if you are a psycho and you want to make headlines, you realize that our schools are soft targets. And we have got to bolster security at our schools. We’ve got to bolster security, so if a psycho wants to walk through the front door and kill a bunch of children, they’re not able."
Sounds like an invitation to me.
Very poorly worded.
I know the truth is hard for y’all . . .
I am not required to agree with you.
You do not define truth for me.
I agree with Sookie on this.
Then you tell me what he said that isn’t truthful? What do you not agree with in his statement?
I stated it sounds like an invitation and it’s very poor wording.
I stand by that statement.
I’m not gonna play semantics with you because you don’t like where I stand.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
it is interesting that once again the FBI had him on their radar and prevented nothing.
How many times do we have to watch this unfold before we put our foot down and tell them to stop spying on us if all they are going to do is watch tragedy happen.
It’s amazing how you lefty’s twist # around to fit in your lil box of hate.
I don't recall you trying to bring up this talking points for Crooks.
originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
Fair enough.
You've made the argument that the entire NSA and FISA system should be dismantled, torched and ashes spread into the wind since it provides no purpose.
The charges come after Gray “knowingly” allowed his son to possess a weapon,
originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha
You wouldn't.
People with standards and honesty would.
Thus .....my point.
Thomas Matthew Crooks, the shooter at former President Donald Trump’s July 13 campaign rally, does not have a public criminal history, according to records. The FBI said Crooks was not on its radar prior to the shooting.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
A Red Flag law wouldn't have helped, in Crooks case, even if Pennsylvania had one in place. And JD Vance extended his "invitation" to would be psycho school shooters much later.
The mother of the teenager suspected of killing four people during a Georgia school shooting called to warn a school counselor prior to the shooting, the suspect’s aunt and grandfather said Saturday.
Colt Gray, 14, apologized to his mother Marcee Gray on the morning of the mass shooting at Apalachee High School — sending an alarming early-morning text that prompted the mother to warn the school, his grandfather told the New York Post.
Marcee Gray’s father, Charles Polhamus, told the New York Post his daughter was at his home in Georgia on Wednesday morning when Colt texted her to say: “I’m sorry, mom.”