Walz's Stolen Valor EXPOSED

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Vermilion

Here’s a press release from March 20, 2005…

x.com...

He’s busted.
Abandon ship!!!!

Thanks for finding that.

Proves he knew about the deployments despite what that other red herring article posted by a Member said and didn't say. 😀

it makes you wonder, do the know all this and they are just trying to test out the lie, before it goes mainstream?

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Vermilion

Here’s a press release from March 20, 2005…

x.com...

He’s busted.
Abandon ship!!!!

Thanks for finding that.

Proves he knew about the deployments despite what that other red herring article posted by a Member said and didn't say. 😀

it makes you wonder, do the know all this and they are just trying to test out the lie, before it goes mainstream?

Lots of bold obvious and wild ass lies being tested this year. 500x more intense than ever. ❗️

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Vermilion

Here’s a press release from March 20, 2005…

x.com...

He’s busted.
Abandon ship!!!!

Thanks for finding that.

Proves he knew about the deployments despite what that other red herring article posted by a Member said and didn't say. 😀

it makes you wonder, do the know all this and they are just trying to test out the lie, before it goes mainstream?

Well, based on their reaction to this thread thus far...they've still got nothing.

a reply to: xuenchen

Ruh Ro!

Now old clips are surfacing of Tim saying he carried
weapons of war. Can't make up stuff this good!

CNN fact checks him as "absolutely false".

Media CNN fact-checks Tim Walz about ‘absolutely false’ claim he carried weapons 'in war'

This is glorious!

Reminds me of Hillary Clinton and the Tarmac story.

www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: burntheships

Yeah that was the video I was referring to a few pages ago.

Pretty clearly tries to trick the audience into thinking he served in combat.

Disgusting.

Progressives hate the military anyway so this won't move the needle with them. I guess we'll see if enough Independents hear about it.

BREAKING NEWS.

Harris campaign walks back Walz Biography.

Now says Walz served as Command Sgt Major.

No longer says he retired as Command Sgt Major.

BUT they still refuse to say that he was a Master Sgt when he retired
and that he was demoted.

Harris Campaign Walks Back Walz Bio Amid Stolen Valor Controversy

The Harris campaign has altered its biography of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz on its campaign website, making a change to a reference to his military service amid ongoing scrutiny of the 2024 Democratic vice presidential nominee’s military credentials.

Walz’s biography initially said he was a "retired Command Sergeant Major."

It has since been updated to say that he "served as a command sergeant major."

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

Ah, I see it now, missed it before.

"We can make sure those weapons of war, that I carried in war, is the only place where those weapons are at."

www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: YourFaceAgain

Ah, I see it now, missed it before.

"We can make sure those weapons of war, that I carried in war, is the only place where those weapons are at."

www.youtube.com...

Yes, that video right there is textbook stolen valor. He never saw war. There is absolutely no defense for that.

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

Serious offense, no wonder Kamala changed his
bio. Someone could try and prosecute him on
the false claim, since it is actually a law.

Makes one wonder if they hid this from Kamala,
or she knew but was left with no choice but
to pick him since everyone else bowed out?

originally posted by: FlyersFan
BREAKING NEWS.

Harris campaign walks back Walz Biography.

Now says Walz served as Command Sgt Major.

No longer says he retired as Command Sgt Major.

BUT they still refuse to say that he was a Master Sgt when he retired
and that he was demoted.

Harris Campaign Walks Back Walz Bio Amid Stolen Valor Controversy

The Harris campaign has altered its biography of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz on its campaign website, making a change to a reference to his military service amid ongoing scrutiny of the 2024 Democratic vice presidential nominee’s military credentials.

Walz’s biography initially said he was a "retired Command Sergeant Major."

It has since been updated to say that he "served as a command sergeant major."

Admission of guilt...PERIOD.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

Walz should be held accountable.

www.afba.com...

a reply to: burntheships

The 2013 Amendment
In 2013, stolen valor rules came back, this time with a new caveat: The lies in question must result in some kind of tangible benefit before they can be considered legally problematic. This helps focus legislative language on fraudulent activity that isn't protected under the First Amendment.

Like using the story to win an election?

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: xuenchen



Reminds me of Hillary Clinton and the Tarmac story.

www.foxnews.com...

Difference is Hillary's lie (in that case) is not illegal.
Walz's lie is definitely prosecutable.

Welp guess that answers that, wonder if they will dump him since they haven't hit the convention yet.

a reply to: Irishhaf

Can they dump him though?
All the dems and the MSM are still telling us how amazing Walz is.

Y'know...just like they did with Joe...BEFORE they dumped him...

...and with Kamala...AFTER they wanted to dump her.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: xuenchen



Reminds me of Hillary Clinton and the Tarmac story.

www.foxnews.com...

Difference is Hillary's lie (in that case) is not illegal.
Walz's lie is definitely prosecutable.

The parallel this will have with Hillary is this:

Democrat veterans will come out and lie and say Walz's fake claims about his record are totally above board. Just like Democrat veterans came to Hillary's defense with the email scandal. They were willing to lie to the public about an enormous national security scandal because politics.

Democrats are party first above ALL else. They'd sell their kids if they thought it would help Harris win.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
Welp guess that answers that, wonder if they will dump him since they haven't hit the convention yet.

Democrats don't admit their mistakes.

It's simply not in their character.

off topic

originally posted by: network dude

Like using the story to win an election?

Yep, like that kind of a benefit, exactly.

Its disgraceful.

"Tim Walz deployed to Italy in 2003, not 1943, and we need to remember that,"

" "He has absolutely no place … he should rip the master sergeant stripes off his shoulder, throw them down, beg forgiveness to his fellow servicemen and women. He should go to every single Gold Star family … and plead for their forgiveness." Van Orden did not mince words when it came to Walz's decision to retire early when his unit was set to be deployed to Iraq, calling it "absolutely unforgivable." www.newsmax.com...

Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis.

If I get in a trolling mood, ill go point out what a liar he is on Reddit and watch them melt down.

But I got a lot on my mind so might not.