Kamala Harris Picks Tim Walz As Running Mate

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: xuenchen

Mark Halperin, reporter said on X that it is
full on expected there are more shoes to
drop on Kamala, open closet and bones
fall out type of things. She was not full
on vetted as Biiden's VP, stories were
catch and killed.

Trump’s closet.

Enough said.

Annees head

Rent free

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: RazorV66

Our Police are dealing with rioters at the moment without shooting anyone.

Thank goodness, the rioters don't have guns.

Your crims have guns because over there they are freely available.

After Newtown, President Obama commissioned the CDC to study gun violence. This was hilarious to me because anti-gun extremists like to falsely claim the CDC is banned from studying gun violence by the Republicans and the NRA, but let's just leave that aside for the moment.

When the study was done, it was completely ignored by the Obama administration and the media. Why?

The data were not what they wanted. CDC found our guns deter more crimes than they enable. They also found that other factors that anti-gun extremists like to ignore were responsible for our violent crime, like our poor handling of mental health and our glorification of violent media.

They recommended further study. In the remaining 4 years of his presidency, President Obama commissioned no further studies.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Well since your country is a fraction of the size of the U.S. I would think percentages would be a more accurate measure, but sure go with sheer numbers if you have to.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Vermilion

But the American frontier is gone and its not the latter half of the 19th century any longer.

For like the 8th time, if they want to update the 2A, there is a mechanism for that. It's called a constitutional amendment.

Maybe you should be badgering gun control advocates to stop wasting time on unconstitutional measures that'll never pass and will just get overturned by the courts if they do?

a reply to: underpass61

The population of the United States is approximately 4.99 times larger than the population of the United Kingdom.

You do have a hell of a lot more space all the same no two ways about that fact.

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Well since your country is a fraction of the size of the U.S. I would think percentages would be a more accurate measure, but sure go with sheer numbers if you have to.

It's really not even that simple because of societal differences and differences in population density and all kinds of things like that. It's not an easy thing to study. And real studies of it are few and far between because the results are usually not what the gun grabbers want.

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

For like the 8th time, if they want to update the 2A, there is a mechanism for that. It's called a constitutional amendment.

And whats that got to do with the American frontier being gone and it no longer being the latter half of the 19th century?

Maybe you should be badgering gun control advocates to stop wasting time on unconstitutional measures that'll never pass and will just get overturned by the courts if they do?

Maybe baby, or maybe I'm allowed an opinion just like you are.

I'm not badgering you personally so whats your goof?

Its not like I'm going to take away your guns.

originally posted by: 5thHead
So why is the first page or two of this thread all about marijuana?

They have to save something for future elections.

Guess it is possible that he is smoking something, otherwise
why he has some very weird legislation like mandatory
tampons machines in boys bathrooms....no idea.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: YourFaceAgain

For like the 8th time, if they want to update the 2A, there is a mechanism for that. It's called a constitutional amendment.

And whats that got to do with the American frontier being gone and it no longer being the latter half of the 19th century?

Maybe you should be badgering gun control advocates to stop wasting time on unconstitutional measures that'll never pass and will just get overturned by the courts if they do?

Maybe baby, or maybe I'm allowed an opinion just like you are.

I'm not badgering you personally so whats your goof?

Its not like I'm going to take away your guns.

You were here asking questions. We're giving you answers. Fact-based answers. Some people change their opinions when presented with new information. I thought maybe you were open-minded enough to do that. No one is trying to take away your right to have an uninformed opinion either, or even to have an unsupported opinion after you've been informed.

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

No, you are giving me your opinion.

The fact is Kamala Harris is not going to take away all your guns.

And if she tried she would be executed.

I am as open-minded as the next person YourFaceAgain.

I just dont think guns are the solution or a good idea which is my opinion.

Harris actually just said "The power is with the people" at this Philadelphia rally after the Democrats just pulled this bait-n-switch with no primary on their voters.

Can't make this # up.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: YourFaceAgain

No, you are giving me your opinion.

The fact is Kamala Harris is not going to take away all your guns.

And if she tried she would be executed.

I am as open-minded as the next person YourFaceAgain.

I just dont think guns are the solution or a good idea which is my opinion.

I posted a lot of facts. Falsely claiming it's all opinion is just dishonest.

Try again at an honest reply.

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

Honestly, if you could post where Kamala Harris explicitly states she is going to take away everyone's gun and remove the Second Amendment that might be nice.

Another question there are approximately 400 million firearms in civilian hands in the United States YourFaceAgain.

Realistically how could they all be bought back?

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: 5thHead
So why is the first page or two of this thread all about marijuana?

They have to save something for future elections.

Guess it is possible that he is smoking something, otherwise
why he has some very weird legislation like mandatory
tampons machines in boys bathrooms....no idea.

Kinda like when Democrats had the House and a SUPERmajority in the Senate under Obama and could literally pass anything they wanted. Republicans were powerless and they did almost nothing with it. Only thing they passed was the ACA.

If they had the answers on things like gun violence, why didn't they pass something? If they really cared about "abortion rights" why didn't they pass something?

Just like you said, then what would they run on?

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

I'm watching this.

Pretty solid stuff. Cue desperate attacks.

"USA'! Go, girl! 😅

Princess Chlamydia is promising to lower the costs that she raised.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: YourFaceAgain

Honestly, if you could post where Kamala Harris explicitly states she is going to take away everyone's gun and remove the Second Amendment that might be nice.

If you could post where I claimed she said that that might be nice. You might have me confused with someone else. You've been getting informed by like 4 different posters on this issue, although you've resisted learning anything with admirable zeal.

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

That's what the buyback crap is all about and you know it.

Kamala Harris is not going to remove the Second Amendment non remove everyone's gun.

Simple as that really, so that's what I'm saying.

Nor is it possible to repurchase 400 million firearms mandated or otherwise

As to the other posters, good for them, i disagree.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: YourFaceAgain

I'm watching this.

Pretty solid stuff. Cue desperate attacks.

"USA'! Go, girl! 😅

You're not exactly objective. She was installed as the candidate without voters having any say. Pointing that out isn't a desperate attack.

Pretending that's normal or that that's consistent with "the power is with the people" is a pretty desperate defense, though.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: YourFaceAgain

That's what the buyback crap is all about and you know it.

Kamala Harris is not going to remove the Second Amendment non remove everyone's gun.

I hope she does.

It'd be fun to watch who would be collecting them.