Trump agrees to debate Harris, and gets better terms.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

I'm sorry, again, please, what is the date the Trump team agreed to for the VP debate? I really can't find it. I can only find their statement that they want to wait because they thought the debate will not be with Harris and they wanted to see who the VP candidate will be.

a reply to: frogs453

Doesn't matter, by your logic.

Heiress agreed.....

So is like an open challenge?

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Trump agreed to a scheduled Presidential debate. I provided the pic of the General Election Presidential debate schedule.

Again, Trump’s team did not want to agree when she approved those dates then and has since said they will wait for the VP to be decided. Take that up with his team.

I mean in all actuality it's very obvious his team was thinking she would be the candidate from the quote in the article while online he was saying he couldn't agree to the Sept date because he didn't know if she would be the nominee.

🐔

It appears to me that this handlers saw how he flubbed the appearance at NABJ.
He’s looking for bootlickers now, like Fox.
Wouldn’t the best venue be a place where both have more equal footing?
I mean for the voters.
It’s clearly a publicity stunt by his campaign, simply so he can call her a chicken, by choosing an earlier date.

And Maga Lardo was probably already booked for Biffs 80th birthday party.

I’d like to see a more open stage, with each candidate agreeing on the questioners.
Her VP will be known by Tuesday

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

I'm sorry, again, please, what is the date the Trump team agreed to for the VP debate? I really can't find it. I can only find their statement that they want to wait because they thought the debate will not be with Harris and they wanted to see who the VP candidate will be.

No matter what the terms are, recent history proves Trump just can't trust the dog sh%t people who represent Harris, and the radical leftist MSM pundits and talking heads who will attempt all sorts of anti Trump TDS antics.

So who cares? Are you a beacon of shining light for truth justice and the American way? No you are certainly not. Your own words often betray you.

a reply to: frogs453

What they, we, all knew is that Biden would not be running.

A topic that should be discussed abit more IMO.

Regardless, these are the standards you're trying to apply, that Heiress needs to still debate Vance as she's still the VP....

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Why are you making this about me?

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Take it up with Trump's team. They want Vance to debate the VP candidate.

TRUMP: I will lower taxes, secure the border, reduce the size of government.


HARRIS: buk-buk-buk-buk-bucaaaw!

a reply to: Dandandat3

You are arguing that she doesn't have rise to the challenge, does not have to prove she can stand up against the odds. I am arguing she does have too.

What odds? The odds that Trump will behave like a sexist, racist, bigoted buffoon and interrupt, insult and talk over Harris every time she tries to answer a moderator's question?

We learned all about "odds" after Trump's bombastic appearance at the NABJ Convention.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Take it up with Trump's team. They want Vance to debate the VP candidate.

So you shift the burden and run?

Na.

I mean I can't stop you but now your double standards are in plain view.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Poor Heiress.

Are you saying she couldn't handily debate Trump without help?

Because that's what I'm reading from your words....

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Dandandat3

You are arguing that she doesn't have rise to the challenge, does not have to prove she can stand up against the odds. I am arguing she does have too.

What odds? The odds that Trump will behave like a sexist, racist, bigoted buffoon and interrupt, insult and talk over Harris every time she tries to answer a moderator's question?

We learned all about "odds" after Trump's bombastic appearance at the NABJ Convention.

Why can't you leftists keep vag and skin color out of the discussion?

Why are you all always so racist and sexist?

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Ok. She should debate Vance on the date the Trump team agreed to. Oh wait Trump's team never agreed to the date she agreed to.

So, Trump should debate her on the agreed Sept 10 date then? She agreed, Trump already agreed per the General Election debate schedule shown?

a reply to: frogs453

Except Trump never agreed to debate Heiress.

That's always been the hole in your logic.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Hey I included the pic to the General Election debate schedule.

You disagree and think it should be titled the Biden/ Trump schedule.

a reply to: frogs453

Currently, those are the two nominees...by vote

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

All the delegate votes are in? I missed that. It's official?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Dandandat3

You are arguing that she doesn't have rise to the challenge, does not have to prove she can stand up against the odds. I am arguing she does have too.

What odds? The odds that Trump will behave like a sexist, racist, bigoted buffoon and interrupt, insult and talk over Harris every time she tries to answer a moderator's question?

We learned all about "odds" after Trump's bombastic appearance at the NABJ Convention.

Jesus
I didn't think anyone could fit that much crying into one 4 line post but there it is.

My tablet screen is leaking from your tears.

a reply to: frogs453

Indeed.

Is there room for error here?