It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs
Poor old man… how dare that mean journalist ask him hard questions.
Maybe he should just stick to Fox News where they treat him with kid gloves.
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs
Poor old man… how dare that mean journalist ask him hard questions.
Maybe he should just stick to Fox News where they treat him with kid gloves.
Wait until your Queen DEI hire that's never been voted for has to answer some real questions.
She is a F'ing buffoon that talks in circles probably even when asked about the weather.
And when she has to debate Trump without a teleprompter, kiss your asses goodbye.
originally posted by: JadedGhost
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs
Poor old man… how dare that mean journalist ask him hard questions.
Maybe he should just stick to Fox News where they treat him with kid gloves.
Wait until your Queen DEI hire that's never been voted for has to answer some real questions.
She is a F'ing buffoon that talks in circles probably even when asked about the weather.
And when she has to debate Trump without a teleprompter, kiss your asses goodbye.
Why is Trump terrified to debate her then?
originally posted by: JadedGhost
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs
Poor old man… how dare that mean journalist ask him hard questions.
Maybe he should just stick to Fox News where they treat him with kid gloves.
Wait until your Queen DEI hire that's never been voted for has to answer some real questions.
She is a F'ing buffoon that talks in circles probably even when asked about the weather.
And when she has to debate Trump without a teleprompter, kiss your asses goodbye.
Why is Trump terrified to debate her then?
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: matafuchs
No, of course not. I'm not the one suggesting that the talking point of Harris being an ancester of a slave owner is a great one to use though, unless you want to highlight she is here because that ancestor raped her great great whatever grandma.
Again, go for it. See how it plays out with voters.
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: Daughter2v2
You do know it's because most white women do not have ancestors who were slaves that were raped by their slave owners, right? You do know that the majority of black families in the U.S. with lineage going back that far here do have white, slave holding ancestors?
I mean if the right wants to run on that, highlighting she is only here because a cruel(if you read documented letters/statements about her slave owning ancestor and his cruelty to his slaves) and rape, go for it. Not sure it will have the effect you think.
I may not be a smart man, but I don't think the argument is about what her heritage is, but rather about how she has portrayed her heritage over the years