Secret Service failures prompts calls for agent recruitment changes...again

a reply to: quintessentone

No member was being attacked bud, try again.

Substance is there, you are just blinded by your TDS and bias echo chamber that you have lived in your whole life.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

No member was being attacked bud, try again.

Substance is there, you are just blinded by your TDS and bias echo chamber that you have lived in your whole life.

Substance and facts are not there, IMO and that is why we can't have a reasonable and kind discussion.

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Hecate666

Nobody has proved DEI hires do not have merit.

That's because the transcripts are sealed 😀😊

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Hecate666

Nobody has proved DEI hires do not have merit.

That's because the transcripts are sealed 😀😊

The investigation may very well show incompetence for agents of both sexes, who knows ... we don't because we don't have the facts yet.

a reply to: quintessentone

You weren't a part of the discussion to begin with but just had to butt in and get your two cents worth before attacking the posters in here.

Feel free to start a discussion and not attack me or any other poster and we can discuss whatever you'd like.

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: ADVISOR

And having a closed mind causes rot as fresh air can't get in and circulate.

The irony of one of the most closed-minded people I've ever seen saying this

Thanks for the laugh.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

You weren't a part of the discussion to begin with but just had to butt in and get your two cents worth before attacking the posters in here.

Feel free to start a discussion and not attack me or any other poster and we can discuss whatever you'd like.

All members jump in when they want, isn't that denying freedom of expression for some members over others? I believe so.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

No member was being attacked bud, try again.

Substance is there, you are just blinded by your TDS and bias echo chamber that you have lived in your whole life.

Substance and facts are not there, IMO and that is why we can't have a reasonable and kind discussion.

Have you considered that if you are the only one who can't have a reasonable discussion that just maybe it's not everyone else who is unreasonable?

a reply to: quintessentone

Feel free to jump in wherever you feel like but don't get triggered when you are proven incorrect and start attacking members.


Again, feel free to start a discussion where you don't attack members and we can talk about anything you want bud.

I will wait right here for it, until then feel free to FO

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

That is too forward thinking

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Feel free to jump in wherever you feel like but don't get triggered when you are proven incorrect and start attacking members.


Again, feel free to start a discussion where you don't attack members and we can talk about anything you want bud.

I will wait right here for it, until then feel free to FO

Again, stop denying members here freedom of expression. Therein lies the reason for my need to repeat common sense.

a reply to: quintessentone

Don't attack members, mr rule enforcer, and we won't have an issue now will we?


Still waiting

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Don't attack members, mr rule enforcer, and we won't have an issue now will we?


Still waiting

Stop denying members freedom of speech, can you do that?

a reply to: quintessentone

As long as you stop attacking members for being correct

Still waiting for you to start a discussion about what you want to talk about

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

As long as you stop attacking members for being correct

Still waiting for you to start a discussion about what you want to talk about

I call out BS so obviously without facts and sources whether or not someone here is correct or not remains 'in the air'.

Again, stop denying freedom of speech to members.

originally posted by: quintessentone
I call out BS ...

If you did then 90% of what you posted here wouldn't exist.


a reply to: ADVISOR

There should be one set of standards for every Secret Service agent.
Not a set for men and a set for women. But ONE SET of standards.
This goes against the DEI garbage that has been running the
Secret Service for the past two years. Fixing the set of standards
will help improve what is obviously a failing agency.

a reply to: quintessentone

As has already been called out by another member, you are the only one that has an issue with me. You should look deeper into why that is.

I ma not denying you anything, I am only asking you not attack members personally and start a discussion where you do not do so.

Why is that such a big ask for you? Is it because you have nothing real to say and you are only here for personal attacks and BS?

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Hecate666

Nobody has proved DEI hires do not have merit.

DEI's hires should not be an assumption of merit nor negligent of required merit. But do they have the necessary merit for the positions which they are hired?

But I'm just going to let this rest here.

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: ADVISOR

I think they first have to give evidence that DEI was the cause of the failed protection of Trump rather than their operational planning and the investigations into that are not yet completed. Jumping the gun a little IMO.

you want Evidence ??? Okay here you go

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

No member was being attacked bud, try again.

Substance is there, you are just blinded by your TDS and bias echo chamber that you have lived in your whole life.

Substance and facts are not there, IMO and that is why we can't have a reasonable and kind discussion.

Have you considered that if you are the only one who can't have a reasonable discussion that just maybe it's not everyone else who is unreasonable?

Have you considered that political bias and taking sides will always have triggered members?