It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke
originally posted by: AlroyFarms
...
Yep. Getting beaten by a black woman must really roll up his hose. So to speak.
Doubtful. He and millions of others have been aware of the media bias against him.
Folks, she is not a black woman.
She's half Indian, half jamacian. She's no more black than Big Mike is a woman.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: BingoMcGoof
So , Time Ragazine is Now putting Ho's on it's Covers ? I'm Shocked !
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: BingoMcGoof
I thought that when someone is shooting at you, and a stack of people are trying to keep you down out of harm's way, that standing up in a 'shoot at me, I'm an easy target' pose for the cameras is not the wisest move.
I'm not a Trump apologist. Still don't trust the man. But to this, I will say that after several seconds on the ground being dog-piled by a cadre of SS agents (several seconds that probably felt like minutes), he probably felt pretty certain that the threat has been neutralised and that - being the showman that he has always been - it was an opportune moment to make a statement.
No, probably wasn't wise, but I can see how the reasoning worked in his mind.
He had just been shot. 43 Seconds seems irrationally short period of time to do a photo op, and the Secret Service staff around him at the time weren't acting like the shooter had been neutralized.
What did Trump say about it?
He said some stupid stuff about being shot for democracy (like that is what denying elections is all about).
He was shot because of easy access to firearms (something that Trump had done nothing to restrict), and because his whole campaign is divisive and promotes outrage, of the type that riles up the kooks and those who believe all the online invective and propaganda.
originally posted by: TheTardis2
originally posted by: chr0naut
He was shot because of easy access to firearms (something that Trump had done nothing to restrict), and because his whole campaign is divisive and promotes outrage, of the type that riles up the kooks and those who believe all the online invective and propaganda.
Stop with this bs. You and I both know that ALL of the cities with strict gun control polices have the worst crime. Access to guns has nothing to do with it. Criminals do not obey the laws. You can make gun laws all day long and it wont matter. Are you also going to restrict knives, then cars, and then rocks? If someone wants to kill someone they will find a way. It has nothing to do with guns. Have you personally tried to go buy an AR15? And trumps campaign being divisive? I dare you to spend 5 minutes searching the internet for quotes from democrat leaders about Trump. You will find more lies than you can stomach. They have lied about everything he does, they call him a dictator, they keep spouting off about project 2025, they have you dems literally believing there will never be another election. I mean if all that was true then why not stop him... But is it? IS IT TRUE??? Hell no its not true. Its DIVISIVE lies from the left. That is the reason this happened.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
2b.) - On the other hand, we have a presidential candidate and former president who made America great in the eyes of the World, who has an assassination attempt on his life undertaken, whom is protected by a protection agency which has been weaponized against him by the very people who did make the cover of time magazine, a group whom wantonly and recklessly discharged their duties with willful neglect.
As part of the World I can assure you Trump didn't make America great in my eyes or the eyes of anyone I know.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Dalamax
" gun control " is a Misnomer in the United States , It Does Not Exist . The Second Amendment says So . SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED is Distinct and Final Language by the way .
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: BingoMcGoof
Heh, yeah...so let's put this into perspective here, shall we??
1.) What you'd really hoped for with your OP was to 'frost' the 'jo-jos' of Trump supporters, not Trump himself.
2.) Let's look at the qualifications to make the cover of time magazine...
2a.) - On the one hand we have a president and VP who lied to America, a president who is mentally unfit to run the country, only to be replaced by a person who is so woefully unqualified to become president that she couldn't even win her own home state, Kalifornia, in the presidential primaries. THIS is the shameful behavior which gets the nod for the cover of time magazine.
Wut?
2b.) - On the other hand, we have a presidential candidate and former president who made America great in the eyes of the World, who has an assassination attempt on his life undertaken,
whom is protected by a protection agency which has been weaponized against him by the very people who did make the cover of time magazine, a group whom wantonly and recklessly discharged their duties with willful neglect. We have a former president who survived said assassination attempt with a fist of defiance in an iconic picture. THIS person does NOT get the nod for the cover of time magazine.
3.) The only thing time magazine got right with their cover was the color, red, the exact same color as the flag of the country the current regime they have sold their soul's to, China, and the exact same color of the flag of the ideology the current regime aspires to become, the Union of Socialist Soviet Republic (USSR).
4.) Time magazine, the banner of American patriotism, don't you think????
Have a nice day.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: BingoMcGoof
I thought that when someone is shooting at you, and a stack of people are trying to keep you down out of harm's way, that standing up in a 'shoot at me, I'm an easy target' pose for the cameras is not the wisest move.
I'm not a Trump apologist. Still don't trust the man. But to this, I will say that after several seconds on the ground being dog-piled by a cadre of SS agents (several seconds that probably felt like minutes), he probably felt pretty certain that the threat has been neutralised and that - being the showman that he has always been - it was an opportune moment to make a statement.
No, probably wasn't wise, but I can see how the reasoning worked in his mind.
He had just been shot. 43 Seconds seems irrationally short period of time to do a photo op, and the Secret Service staff around him at the time weren't acting like the shooter had been neutralized.
What did Trump say about it?
He said some stupid stuff about being shot for democracy (like that is what denying elections is all about).
He was shot because of easy access to firearms (something that Trump had done nothing to restrict), and because his whole campaign is divisive and promotes outrage, of the type that riles up the kooks and those who believe all the online invective and propaganda.
Easy Access to Firearms eh ? You Do Realize Crooks BORROWED that Firearm from his LIBERAL Father and Lied to him that he was just going to the Shooting Range to Practice , Right Naughts ?
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: chr0naut
I carry everyday. I have guns in my home. My kids and wife all know how to use them. They all know the ROE. My job does not dictate this.
Guns are not the issue. If that were the case, the government would not exist as it is right now.