Remember that picture of Trumps fist in the air and blood on his face?

I do. I thought at the time that that one would make a majestic cover for Time Magazine. Powerful, Iconic. Certainly an image to go down in history.

But did it make the cover of Time, we know how he loves his picture on the cover of Time.

Welllll, it got stolen from him. Bet that frosts his jo jos.

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
I do. I thought at the time that that one would make a majestic cover for Time Magazine. Powerful, Iconic. Certainly an image to go down in history.

But did it make the cover of Time, we know how he loves his picture on the cover of Time.

Welllll, it got stolen from him. Bet that frosts his jo jos.

Yep. Getting beaten by a black woman must really roll up his hose. So to speak.

originally posted by: Boomer1947

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
I do. I thought at the time that that one would make a majestic cover for Time Magazine. Powerful, Iconic. Certainly an image to go down in history.

But did it make the cover of Time, we know how he loves his picture on the cover of Time.

Welllll, it got stolen from him. Bet that frosts his jo jos.

Yep. Getting beaten by a black woman must really roll up his hose. So to speak.

Doubtful. He and millions of others have been aware of the media bias against him.

originally posted by: Boomer1947

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
I do. I thought at the time that that one would make a majestic cover for Time Magazine. Powerful, Iconic. Certainly an image to go down in history.

But did it make the cover of Time, we know how he loves his picture on the cover of Time.

Welllll, it got stolen from him. Bet that frosts his jo jos.

Yep. Getting beaten by a black woman must really roll up his hose. So to speak.

I agree! Joe absolutely hates her now. In his mind, he just got beat by the Jungle he refused to send his children to school ain. He was always such a bigot. Seeing her shove him off the cover to the right and come walking in.

a reply to: AlroyFarms

Well ah, sure. But we all also know about how he had phony covers of Time displayed around several of his golf resorts, right?

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

I doubt it. the pictures on t shirts and other things so its fine with him.

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

I thought that when someone is shooting at you, and a stack of people are trying to keep you down out of harm's way, that standing up in a 'shoot at me, I'm an easy target' pose for the cameras is not the wisest move.

originally posted by: AlroyFarms
...
Yep. Getting beaten by a black woman must really roll up his hose. So to speak.

Doubtful. He and millions of others have been aware of the media bias against him.

Folks, she is not a black woman.

She's half Indian, half jamacian. She's no more black than Big Mike is a woman.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: BingoMcGoof

I thought that when someone is shooting at you, and a stack of people are trying to keep you down out of harm's way, that standing up in a 'shoot at me, I'm an easy target' pose for the cameras is not the wisest move.

I'm not a Trump apologist. Still don't trust the man. But to this, I will say that after several seconds on the ground being dog-piled by a cadre of SS agents (several seconds that probably felt like minutes), he probably felt pretty certain that the threat has been neutralised and that - being the showman that he has always been - it was an opportune moment to make a statement.

No, probably wasn't wise, but I can see how the reasoning worked in his mind.

originally posted by: Boomer1947
Getting beaten by a black woman must really roll up his hose. So to speak.

1/2 Jamaican.
That's not black.
And why would it 'roll up his hose'?
He's not a racist.
Stop believing the left wing propaganda.

TIME is left wing.
OF COURSE they'd go with a Kamala cover instead of a cover making Trump look good.
It's all part of the left wing social engineering and mind programming they do.

originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: BingoMcGoof

I thought that when someone is shooting at you, and a stack of people are trying to keep you down out of harm's way, that standing up in a 'shoot at me, I'm an easy target' pose for the cameras is not the wisest move.

I'm not a Trump apologist. Still don't trust the man. But to this, I will say that after several seconds on the ground being dog-piled by a cadre of SS agents (several seconds that probably felt like minutes), he probably felt pretty certain that the threat has been neutralised and that - being the showman that he has always been - it was an opportune moment to make a statement.

No, probably wasn't wise, but I can see how the reasoning worked in his mind.

He had just been shot. 43 Seconds seems irrationally short period of time to do a photo op, and the Secret Service staff around him at the time weren't acting like the shooter had been neutralized.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: BingoMcGoof

I thought that when someone is shooting at you, and a stack of people are trying to keep you down out of harm's way, that standing up in a 'shoot at me, I'm an easy target' pose for the cameras is not the wisest move.

I'm not a Trump apologist. Still don't trust the man. But to this, I will say that after several seconds on the ground being dog-piled by a cadre of SS agents (several seconds that probably felt like minutes), he probably felt pretty certain that the threat has been neutralised and that - being the showman that he has always been - it was an opportune moment to make a statement.

No, probably wasn't wise, but I can see how the reasoning worked in his mind.

He had just been shot. 43 Seconds seems irrationally short period of time to do a photo op, and the Secret Service staff around him at the time weren't acting like the shooter had been neutralized.

What did Trump say about it?

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: BingoMcGoof

I thought that when someone is shooting at you, and a stack of people are trying to keep you down out of harm's way, that standing up in a 'shoot at me, I'm an easy target' pose for the cameras is not the wisest move.

I'm not a Trump apologist. Still don't trust the man. But to this, I will say that after several seconds on the ground being dog-piled by a cadre of SS agents (several seconds that probably felt like minutes), he probably felt pretty certain that the threat has been neutralised and that - being the showman that he has always been - it was an opportune moment to make a statement.

No, probably wasn't wise, but I can see how the reasoning worked in his mind.

He had just been shot. 43 Seconds seems irrationally short period of time to do a photo op, and the Secret Service staff around him at the time weren't acting like the shooter had been neutralized.

What did Trump say about it?

He said some stupid stuff about being shot for democracy (like that is what denying elections is all about).

He was shot because of easy access to firearms (something that Trump had done nothing to restrict), and because his whole campaign is divisive and promotes outrage, of the type that riles up the kooks and those who believe all the online invective and propaganda.

I haven't found Time magazine to be interesting or relevant in like two decades. So, whatever. And that has nothing to do with Trump. Time magazine to journalism is like Michelin stars to food, totally disconnected from real thought/opinion and riding grandfathered success.

originally posted by: chr0naut
He was shot because of easy access to firearms (something that Trump had done nothing to restrict), and because his whole campaign is divisive and promotes outrage,

NOPE. Nice try sparky, but that's not true.

The shooter also had searches for the DNC and for Princess Catherine of England.

The shooter was just looking for someone famous to off so he could be famous.

Trump's campaign isn't divisive and doesn't promote outrage.

However, the DEMOCRATS go around calling Trump 'Hitler' and a 'threat to Democracy', and they scream that he has to be stopped. THAT is 'divisive" and 'promotes outrage'.

Oh .. and the laws we have for firearms are just fine. Just because some people manage to get around them isn't a reason to restrict the vast majority of people who are responsible gun owners. That's retarded.

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

From a statistics point of view, which is more common, an attempted assassination of a president/candidate or a president that is running for a second time to withdraw his candidacy?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: BingoMcGoof

I thought that when someone is shooting at you, and a stack of people are trying to keep you down out of harm's way, that standing up in a 'shoot at me, I'm an easy target' pose for the cameras is not the wisest move.

I'm not a Trump apologist. Still don't trust the man. But to this, I will say that after several seconds on the ground being dog-piled by a cadre of SS agents (several seconds that probably felt like minutes), he probably felt pretty certain that the threat has been neutralised and that - being the showman that he has always been - it was an opportune moment to make a statement.

No, probably wasn't wise, but I can see how the reasoning worked in his mind.

He had just been shot. 43 Seconds seems irrationally short period of time to do a photo op, and the Secret Service staff around him at the time weren't acting like the shooter had been neutralized.

What did Trump say about it?

He was shot because of easy access to firearms (something that Trump had done nothing to restrict),

How ignorant can one be....

and because his whole campaign is divisive and promotes outrage, of the type that riles up the kooks and those who believe all the online invective and propaganda.

I think you are thinking of Biden's campaign there bud. You know the one trying their hardest to imprison his political opponent, calling him "Hitler", a "threat to democracy", "will put all of us into concentration camps", etc.

Would have been a more accurate picture, if Joe was tripping off the edge of the cover.

Just saying.

originally posted by: chr0naut

He was shot because of easy access to firearms (something that Trump had done nothing to restrict), and because his whole campaign is divisive and promotes outrage, of the type that riles up the kooks and those who believe all the online invective and propaganda.

Stop with this bs. You and I both know that ALL of the cities with strict gun control polices have the worst crime. Access to guns has nothing to do with it. Criminals do not obey the laws. You can make gun laws all day long and it wont matter. Are you also going to restrict knives, then cars, and then rocks? If someone wants to kill someone they will find a way. It has nothing to do with guns. Have you personally tried to go buy an AR15? And trumps campaign being divisive? I dare you to spend 5 minutes searching the internet for quotes from democrat leaders about Trump. You will find more lies than you can stomach. They have lied about everything he does, they call him a dictator, they keep spouting off about project 2025, they have you dems literally believing there will never be another election. I mean if all that was true then why not stop him... But is it? IS IT TRUE??? Hell no its not true. Its DIVISIVE lies from the left. That is the reason this happened.