Why did law enforcement ignore videos and reports of a shooter on the roof 7/13/2024

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Impossible, you've only been on here a couple years

Nope, wrong again.

a reply to: quintessentone

Mhm, sure.

Whatever you say bud

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Mhm, sure.

Whatever you say bud

Whatever the FBI says is my point and stop your nonsense here.

The plot thickens, it seems the FBI knew of an Iranian plot to assassinate Trump before the lone shooter in the roof

And still Trump did not get more security.

www.msn.com...< br />
Really, this becoming ridiculous,

a reply to: TheSingleBillie

The roof where the sniper/shooter/murderer was positioned, was in a "safe zone" set up by the Secret Service.

The security bubble around the venue had that rooftop excluded from scrutiny.

See the Diagram down the page a bit, here: theconservativetreehouse.com... raphed-by-law-enforcement-with-picture-forwarded/

Some things are so obvious and simple, people have a hard time accepting them. They want to make it complicated. That's what keeps many crimes from being solved quickly.
😒

a reply to: quintessentone

Except the FBI said, from your link, there were "possible bomb making materials". You are the one that refuses to show where they actually said there were 2 bombs.

So that is not your point.

There you go again, thinking your a mod when they wouldn't be stupid enough to make you a mod around here.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Except the FBI said, from your link, there were "possible bomb making materials". You are the one that refuses to show where they actually said there were 2 bombs.

So that is not your point.

There you go again, thinking your a mod when they wouldn't be stupid enough to make you a mod around here.

It was said on the news from the TV, I also sourced another FBI statement where they mention 'explosives' were found. Maybe the news anchor added their own slant to the story, would not be the first time misinformation and disinformation is on the news, right?

You are off the rails now.

a reply to: PorkChop96

That one has a way of confusing obstinance for intelligence.

a reply to: PorkChop96

you don't understand. You are just wrong. Sure it was an idiotic lie, but you are still just wrong. The sooner you can accept that, the faster someone else's posts can be derailed. Get with it .

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: PorkChop96

That one has a way of confusing obstinance for intelligence.

The intelligence is to be found in the truth, read my source from the FBI. Explosives found, not bomb making materials. Simple enough to understand, right? Oh wait.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: PorkChop96

you don't understand. You are just wrong. Sure it was an idiotic lie, but you are still just wrong. The sooner you can accept that, the faster someone else's posts can be derailed. Get with it .

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: PorkChop96

you don't understand. You are just wrong. Sure it was an idiotic lie, but you are still just wrong. The sooner you can accept that, the faster someone else's posts can be derailed. Get with it .

What is wrong when the FBI says explosives, not bomb making materials, were found in Crooks car?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: PorkChop96

That one has a way of confusing obstinance for intelligence.

The intelligence is to be found in the truth, read my source from the FBI. Explosives found, not bomb making materials. Simple enough to understand, right? Oh wait.

The same FBI that said Hunter's laptop was Russian disinfo?

OK genius

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: PorkChop96

That one has a way of confusing obstinance for intelligence.

The intelligence is to be found in the truth, read my source from the FBI. Explosives found, not bomb making materials. Simple enough to understand, right? Oh wait.

What are bomb making materials for 800 Alex?

Triggers, accelerants, timers and...explosives

a reply to: quintessentone

Your most recent link stated "Suspicious devices", again how is that a bomb? It's not.

Not the first from the news and not your first time spreading a plethora of misinformation/disinformation either.

Sorry that pointing out your inaccuracies is "off the rails", maybe you should be more diligent in finding and sourcing your own sources.

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: PorkChop96

That one has a way of confusing obstinance for intelligence.

The intelligence is to be found in the truth, read my source from the FBI. Explosives found, not bomb making materials. Simple enough to understand, right? Oh wait.

What are bomb making materials for 800 Alex?

Triggers, accelerants, timers and...explosives

Crooks was not a hired sniper. That ridiculous conspiracy theory is out the window.

a reply to: quintessentone

Says one lunatic on the internet........case closed ladies and gents

Quit spinning it. Facts are clues, and not total conclusions. Sherlock Holmes taught us that ALL the facts have to be examined. We don't have that here.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Justoneman
Facts DONT explain the situation.

FACTS are CLUES!

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Wookiep

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: TheSingleBillie
a reply to: quintessentone

Perhaps, except he was wearing a gray sweatsuit, not a uniform.

Well Biden ordered a full investigation as to the SS failures, so we will find out soon enough.

Oh I'm sure that will help. 😂

Lol, you're a riot. 😂 😂 😂 😂

Conspiracy theories don't cut the mustard.

TRUE, but we are talking facts. Theories come after you have some facts. Theories help connect the dot and do not have to be true, yet they help get to the truth faster than laughing at people with facts.

Facts should explain the situation and if there are further questions, then more investigations are needed to gain more facts and answers. Conspiracy theories don't fit in there, IMO.

Facts explain a lot, to answer further questions requires investigation to get more facts...conspiracy theories don't provide answers.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: PorkChop96

That one has a way of confusing obstinance for intelligence.

The intelligence is to be found in the truth, read my source from the FBI. Explosives found, not bomb making materials. Simple enough to understand, right? Oh wait.

What are bomb making materials for 800 Alex?

Triggers, accelerants, timers and...explosives

Crooks was not a hired sniper. That ridiculous conspiracy theory is out the window.

I never said he was.

Or is this you putting words in other peoples mouths?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SomeStupidName
a reply to: quintessentone

That's not a lot, the typical magazine hold 30 rounds.

How many rounds would an alleged sniper need?

Yep, ONE BOX would be how many boxes he needed. Not two.

Get it?

That isn't to much even if he only needed one. They won't sell you one or two bullets unless it is black market.