It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
a reply to: watchitburn
Our good friend Thoughtful3 posted this in another thread.
it's a doosey
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: SomeStupidName
a reply to: quintessentone
That's not a lot, the typical magazine hold 30 rounds.
How many rounds would an alleged sniper need?
Yep, ONE BOX would be how many boxes he needed. Not two.
Get it?
That isn't to much even if he only needed one. They won't sell you one or two bullets unless it is black market.
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
Says one lunatic on the internet........case closed ladies and gents
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
What's disappointing is that you believe every little thing you read on MSM to be gospel.
The FBI put out that statement.
originally posted by: Justoneman
Quit spinning it. Facts are clues, and not total conclusions. Sherlock Holmes taught us that ALL the facts have to be examined. We don't have that here.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Justoneman
Facts DONT explain the situation.
FACTS are CLUES!
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Wookiep
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: TheSingleBillie
a reply to: quintessentone
Perhaps, except he was wearing a gray sweatsuit, not a uniform.
Well Biden ordered a full investigation as to the SS failures, so we will find out soon enough.
Oh I'm sure that will help. 😂
Lol, you're a riot. 😂 😂 😂 😂
Conspiracy theories don't cut the mustard.
TRUE, but we are talking facts. Theories come after you have some facts. Theories help connect the dot and do not have to be true, yet they help get to the truth faster than laughing at people with facts.
Facts should explain the situation and if there are further questions, then more investigations are needed to gain more facts and answers. Conspiracy theories don't fit in there, IMO.
Facts explain a lot, to answer further questions requires investigation to get more facts...conspiracy theories don't provide answers.
originally posted by: underpass61
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: PorkChop96
That one has a way of confusing obstinance for intelligence.
The intelligence is to be found in the truth, read my source from the FBI. Explosives found, not bomb making materials. Simple enough to understand, right? Oh wait.
The same FBI that said Hunter's laptop was Russian disinfo?
OK genius
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: SomeStupidName
a reply to: quintessentone
That's not a lot, the typical magazine hold 30 rounds.
How many rounds would an alleged sniper need?
Yep, ONE BOX would be how many boxes he needed. Not two.
Get it?
That isn't to much even if he only needed one. They won't sell you one or two bullets unless it is black market.
one box of 20 or one box of 50, let's go for the 50 when I need only 5 rounds in my AR-15.
Get it?
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: underpass61
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: PorkChop96
That one has a way of confusing obstinance for intelligence.
The intelligence is to be found in the truth, read my source from the FBI. Explosives found, not bomb making materials. Simple enough to understand, right? Oh wait.
The same FBI that said Hunter's laptop was Russian disinfo?
OK genius
OK you genius can believe in the alleged sniper conspiracy theory...it makes good entertainment for me.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: SomeStupidName
a reply to: quintessentone
That's not a lot, the typical magazine hold 30 rounds.
How many rounds would an alleged sniper need?
Yep, ONE BOX would be how many boxes he needed. Not two.
Get it?
That isn't to much even if he only needed one. They won't sell you one or two bullets unless it is black market.
one box of 20 or one box of 50, let's go for the 50 when I need only 5 rounds in my AR-15.
Get it?
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: quintessentone
for a diversion? That's what I thought as well.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: underpass61
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: PorkChop96
That one has a way of confusing obstinance for intelligence.
The intelligence is to be found in the truth, read my source from the FBI. Explosives found, not bomb making materials. Simple enough to understand, right? Oh wait.
The same FBI that said Hunter's laptop was Russian disinfo?
OK genius
OK you genius can believe in the alleged sniper conspiracy theory...it makes good entertainment for me.
originally posted by: underpass61
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: underpass61
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: PorkChop96
That one has a way of confusing obstinance for intelligence.
The intelligence is to be found in the truth, read my source from the FBI. Explosives found, not bomb making materials. Simple enough to understand, right? Oh wait.
The same FBI that said Hunter's laptop was Russian disinfo?
OK genius
OK you genius can believe in the alleged sniper conspiracy theory...it makes good entertainment for me.
And you can believe the FBI - I'm sure their info is accurate and truthful THIS TIME -
Clown
The Department of Homeland Security and the FBI have issued a bulletin to law enforcement across the country warning them that, in the wake of Saturday's attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, violent extremists could try to conduct "follow-on or retaliatory" attacks at events over the next few months related to the 2024 presidential election.
The bulletin urged local, state and federal law enforcement -- and their partners -- to remain vigilant and report any suspicious behavior.
"The FBI and DHS remain concerned ... particularly given that individuals in some online communities have threatened, encouraged, or referenced acts of violence in response to the attempted assassination," said the bulletin, issued Monday night as the Republican National Convention got underway in Milwaukee to officially nominate Trump as the Republican Party's candidate for the White House in November.
originally posted by: quintessentone
I can only surmise that since they had their own snipers on some roofs they may have been confused as to whether the shooter was one of their own or not?
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: TheSingleBillie
There are phone camera videos of people reporting to the police and sheriffs, a man on the roof.
A policeman went up to the roof, saw the shooter who turned toward him and got off the roof.
There are multiple phone cameras that caught people trying to tell the law enforcement that there was a man on the roof with a rifle, over a minute before the shooting occurred.
There is evidence Crooks was reported to law enforcement as behaving suspiciously and they did nothing.
youtu.be...
What was the response?
Nothing, NADA
The Secret Service head said in an interview, the roof was too "steep" to put an officer on that roof and so they decided not to.
youtu.be...
Sadly, law enforcement, it appears, allowed the shooter to remain on the roof.
Do you think I'm wrong, please do post as to why you think I'm wrong.
I put this under conspiracy theories, because this will clearly become one.
Stay civil please, don't incite more violence, please respond calmly without pointing at any particular person. We can not ignore this evidence, but neither should we incite more violence.
Please discuss this as if you were discussing the weirdness around the JFK assassination.
Thanks.
I believe the story of the cop going up and having the gun pointed at him is an AP (associated press) or LEO fabrication. A cop would back off and then come back up, gun in hand and ready, then shoot the gunman. Any other scenario is simply silly. Unless of course the cops are all DEI hires that have never seen a "Murder-Death-Kill" scenario in their utopian world.
Cheers - Dave
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: quintessentone
I can only surmise that since they had their own snipers on some roofs they may have been confused as to whether the shooter was one of their own or not?
No. They would have been informed from a director. They all had ear radios. Your "surmise" is all BS. You seem to be wild ass hyena banshee today covering for the "implied" ideas this was planned by NWO-Democrats and Trump hate mongers. 🤣🤣 Wild screaming yellow