It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Tolkien
So, you'd have NATO turn its back on Ukraine and abandon it to its fate under Putin?
He'd eradicate Ukrainian culture, relocate most Ukrainians to the Russian hinterlands and then forcibly relocate Russian people to those lands.
Once he's done with that he'd turn his attention onto his next victims.
Latvia? Lithuania? Estonia?
Then Poland?
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Tolkien
Who said anything about the west doing a draft or construction?
Everyone jumps to the worst hyperbolic outcome like draft and nukes.
I don’t see why the world needs to capitulate to the band of dictators just because nukes. Screw that. North Korea, Iran, Russia and China can kick rocks. We’re not going to keep them in check if we don’t have the fortitude to make good on a promise to a nation who destroyed their nukes with the promise we’d at least help them protect their sovereignty.
Russia is in no position to do anything in the immediate future primarily because this “special military operation” didn’t go as planned.
They lost more than they did in Afghanistan which helped lead to the fall of the USSR. They’re on track to lose more than the US has in all of our post WWII wars.
And you could say “Russia is just protecting their interests”, but I’d like to ask when’s the last time a world power has taken massive amounts of land from another country? That’s not a defensive war.