It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude
Was it said?
No! Northam never said that he wanted doctors and parents to discuss the murder of newborn babies.
What he did talk about was doctors discussing with parents whether or not resuscitate and/or to apply palliative care to an infant whose prognosis to survive may be excruciating pain and eventual death.
“If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” he continued. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
“If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” he continued. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
What is your problem with the above statement?
this deserves an answer.
The problem I have with this, is the deformed monster that was born, is still a human, alive, outside the womb, and the only thing that separates that child from a 30 year old mentally challenged kid in a wheelchair is 30 years. If you think killing the baby just after birth is OK, then what stops you from killing the 30 year old. Hell, you might want to retire and relax after taking care of a special needs kid for 30 years. Got a glock? BOOM, situation fixed, Beach here you come.
See, that's why it's a problem. It sucks, it's not fair. And I'd hate to be in the position. But I know many who were, and however they justify it, they all claim to love their kids. Even if they are special. Ask around.
so he didn't say this:
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
“If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” he continued. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
What is your problem with the above statement?
this deserves an answer.
The problem I have with this, is the deformed monster that was born, is still a human, alive, outside the womb, and the only thing that separates that child from a 30 year old mentally challenged kid in a wheelchair is 30 years. If you think killing the baby just after birth is OK, then what stops you from killing the 30 year old. Hell, you might want to retire and relax after taking care of a special needs kid for 30 years. Got a glock? BOOM, situation fixed, Beach here you come.
See, that's why it's a problem. It sucks, it's not fair. And I'd hate to be in the position. But I know many who were, and however they justify it, they all claim to love their kids. Even if they are special. Ask around.
Yeah. It sucks!
It sucks whenever a doctors tell you a family member may not survive, whether it be a car accident, a stroke or you find out your fetus is incompatible with life. It sucks when a family member has to decide whether or not to pull the plug on a loved one. But it happens.
Trump is liar, when he claims that Democrats are trying to legalize infanticide. And you gladly keep repeating and defending the lie.
“I know nothing about Project 2025,” Trump posted on his social media website. “I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: Sookiechacha
LOL! And so because of this, you will consciously choose a person who is clinically BRAIN-DEAD for a president to lead the free world!
That's...just...'great'!
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: Sookiechacha
LOL! And so because of this, you will consciously choose a person who is clinically BRAIN-DEAD for a president to lead the free world!
That's...just...'great'!
Not only that.
As I told you before, I will vote for the Democrat machine, regardless of who they put on the ticket. A corpse would be better than Trump.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude
Thank you for posting more of Trump's lies!
originally posted by: boatguy12
a reply to: network dude
Look up Agenda 47. That is all Trump. Project 2025 is from some other source having nothing to do with Trump. Quit your lying and vote for the corpse.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude
You're a riot! LOL
Got a link to prove that Trump ISN'T lying (multiple time) in that statement?
You think because you're citing Trump, it's proof that Trump isn't lying!
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude
Thank you for posting more of Trump's lies!
got a link to prove it's a lie? Or is this more of that mind boggling wisdom you know, but just can't explain how. Like the words Northam said weren't actually the words we heard or the MSM wrote down. Keep digging hun. It's getting pretty enjoyable to watch.