BREAKING: TRUMP WINS! Supreme Court Rules 6-3 on Presidential Immunity

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: namehere

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: namehere

originally posted by: DBCowboy
So when Biden becomes King, the left will be good with that.

no you just miss the point, that you Republicans just destroyed our nations foundation, our country is #ed now.

Jesus.
Take a deep F’ing breath.

This Liberal hyperventilating is damn ridiculous.

bitch both parties practice liberalism, im pissed because you fools betrayed America for the sake of power, sold your soul for devils to consume, just handed America's future over to forces of chaos and tyranny, you all lost sight of what America is, a nation of the rule of law, not personal self interests and faction.

i don't think you get how a line was crossed, a line that never should've been crossed. i don't think you understand how empire's fall, im not mad for myself or for any progressive ideology, im mad because this sealed our fate as a nation, good luck on America lasting another century after this especially with the foolishness you conservatives have planned after this.

Am I to assume that you think this is some new law that was just announced today about presidential immunity?

Wise up.

wise up huh, there was never such a law and this ruling twists the actual law into the opposite of what it actually says, making presidents above the law and unaccountable to the courts or Congress forevermore.

a reply to: namehere

making presidents above the law and unaccountable to the courts or Congress forevermore.

Good thing this isn't true then.

Which you'd know if you bothered to read the opinion instead of listening to talking points from your source de jour.

regardless of anything else this ruling doesn't just give the president the power of a dictator, it also implies that the law no longer applies to anyone, so anarchy is about to consume America.

a reply to: namehere

a reply to: JinMI


Attorney Robert Barnes Explains in Dept this SCOTUS Ruling concerning Mr. Trump .



www.infowars.com...

a reply to: namehere

But I thought anarchy was going to destroy America after Roe was reversed.
Make up your minds already.

originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: namehere

But I thought anarchy was going to destroy America after Roe was reversed.
Make up your minds already.

So tired of these hysterical clowns.

originally posted by: namehere

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: namehere

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: namehere

originally posted by: DBCowboy
So when Biden becomes King, the left will be good with that.

no you just miss the point, that you Republicans just destroyed our nations foundation, our country is #ed now.

liar.

Who's in charge now?

Biden Regime.

He could kill all of us because.

[snip]

Quoted for a rather Godlike level of projection, considering that the party who has been systematically dismantling the actual fabric of America since the Civil War started has been the Democratic party.

The funny part is, there are leaders in your own party who openly call people such as yourself "useless eaters."

The ones what will be first in the lye pits once they have cemented their own power in the New American Democracy.

And you are worried about Republicans and the SCOTUS pointing out what the Constitutional duties of a President are and what protections an American President has.

Turn off CNN and pick up a book.

/golf clap

yeah we're not stupid, many of us know Democrats used to be the conservative party before 1965, while the Republicans were the progressives, that the current Republican party is a completely different party that just masquerades as the lincoln Republicans to decieve free minded people into accepting tyranny and oppression and slavery.

LMAO!

Yea, Biden voters are stupid.

Democrats have been the Progressive party beginning in the late 1890's. The Democrat party was taken over by Progressives in 1913. They pushed laws like Prohibition and Eugenics and Purifying the Electorate by disenfranchising black voters in the south. Progressives gave us the Federal Reserve, fought Republicans for over 60 years to deny a woman the right to vote or hold office and hated the idea of the Civil Rights Act.

Democrats were never EVER Conservatives. In fact, they responded to the first Conservative Republican President being elected by starting a Civil War.

Progressives seek to control the means of production by fiat... by Federal law.

Communists seek to control the means of production by owning it on a Federal level.

There is no difference between Progressive ideology and Communist ideology except the mechanism of control.

All major candidates in the Democratic party fight in debates over who is a bigger Progressive.

Care to link for me where Republicans do that?

Thank you in advance for teaching me something new...

originally posted by: namehere
regardless of anything else this ruling doesn't just give the president the power of a dictator, it also implies that the law no longer applies to anyone, so anarchy is about to consume America.

The SCOTUS just reaffirmed existing Constitutional law.

Any anarchy coming is going to be from the mostly peaceful left.

As usual.

originally posted by: namehere
regardless of anything else this ruling doesn't just give the president the power of a dictator, it also implies that the law no longer applies to anyone, so anarchy is about to consume America.

You clearly don't understand this subject.
The SC ruled years ago that the President has immunity for official acts for civil lawsuits and the only reason they have had to make this decision officially wrt to criminal acts also is because the Democrats engaged in outrageous lawfare, criminalising official Presidential acts.
After the election of 2020 it was totally within the Presidents duties to fully investigate potential election fraud - the executive branch is supposed to enforce the laws of the land. So, trying to get hold of voting machines or asking the Vice President to stall any ratification of the election is legitimate and official business of the President.

Nothing the SC ruled this week provides immunity for a President outside official acts and it is 100% right that a President should be immune to punishment for carrying out official acts.

If he/she were not, then even foreign countries could indict and have ex-Presidents extradited to stand trial for whatever they consider crimes.
Are you willing to have Obama extradited to stand trial in the middle east for murdering civilians, for example?

It should have never been required, but the Democrats - in an effort to rig an election - went after their political opponent using lawfare on made up crimes. That door needed to be slammed shut.

originally posted by: namehere
regardless of anything else this ruling doesn't just give the president the power of a dictator, it also implies that the law no longer applies to anyone, so anarchy is about to consume America.

Then Obama should go to jail. He sorta acted less me a global dictator?


Remember Obama’s frequent and uncontrollable use of drone strikes.

U.S. Drone Strikes Violate International Law, Reports Allege

www.npr.org...

a reply to: namehere

Are you under the impression that presidential immunity is a new thing? Do you have it in your head that prior to this ruling presidential immunity didn't exist?
Newsflash! It isn't new.
And considering the crickets when democrat presidents did things like murdering american citizens via drone strike with absolutely no due process I find it very hard to take reactions like yours seriously. You're not concerned for the country. You don't give a single fuxx about the country. You're concerned for power not being solely in the hands of democrats. It's terrifying to you that democrats may have to face the same treatment they've been giving out. Isn't so easy to chuckle at how people are treated when you're getting a taste of your own medicine is it?

a reply to: MrGashler

Are you under the impression that presidential immunity is a new thing? Do you have it in your head that prior to this ruling presidential immunity didn't exist?

Richard Nixon would like to have a word with you.

And considering the crickets when democrat presidents did things like murdering american citizens via drone strike I find it very hard to take reactions like yours seriously.

Thanks George Patriot Act Bush! By the way, do you know how many American have been incarcerated at GITMO with absolutely no due process? 780, that's the reported number.

a reply to: UKTruth

The SC ruled years ago that the President has immunity for official acts for civil lawsuits and the only reason they have had to make this decision officially wrt to criminal acts also is because the Democrats engaged in outrageous lawfare, criminalising official Presidential acts.

Right. This opinion and its new "absolute immunity" and evidentiary new rules were created by this court to protect Donald Trump from the indictments brought down by the Biden Administration.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: UKTruth

The SC ruled years ago that the President has immunity for official acts for civil lawsuits and the only reason they have had to make this decision officially wrt to criminal acts also is because the Democrats engaged in outrageous lawfare, criminalising official Presidential acts.

Right. This opinion and its new "absolute immunity" and evidentiary new rules were created by this court to protect Donald Trump from the indictments brought down by the Biden Administration.

There’s nothing new about the decision.
It’s only a rebuke to the lower courts to start acting right and fly straight because they haven’t been doing their jobs.

The majority said the 45th POTUS is entitled to the same immunity as all the presidents before him, the one in office now, and all future presidents.

You guys its all so exhausting at this point trying to debunk the alarmist bs going on in the world today can anybody explain because people are making it seem like now if Trump gets re-elected he can do all this crazy stuff like Reichstag 2.0 and have immunity from it but I don't think that's what this ruling means but can anybody explain to me like it doesn't mean that right?

a reply to: Shoshanna

In 2016 Democrats made half the country believe that if Donald Trump won the presidency he would drop nuclear weapons on his enemies. You can't put much stock in the scare mongering that Democrats like to engage in.

Where does the idea that the president is immune from criminal prosecution come from?
The Supreme Court has never held that a president is immune from criminal prosecution. It’s the Department of Justice that says that. And because the Department of Justice controls all the federal prosecutors, it means that no federal prosecutor, including the new special counsel [investigating Biden’s offsite storage of classified documents], can prosecute a sitting president. The Office of Legal Counsel in the Department of Justice thinks there’s such a rule in the Constitution because it believes a criminal indictment and prosecution — and of course, punishment — would effectively incapacitate the presidency. And they further believe it’s unconstitutional to incapacitate the sitting president, and that the only means by which you can [legally] incapacitate the president are impeachment, which removes the president from office, or the 25th Amendment, which sidelines an incapacitated president. The OLC does not believe that a state prosecutor or even a federal prosecutor should be able to prosecute the president and eventually put him or her in jail, because they don’t think the Constitution would allow a local or federal prosecutor to incapacitate the chief executive.

www.law.virginia.edu...

this was written before the current SCOTUS ruling. And it's important to grasp what really happened, once you get past the teeth gnashing and sandy vajayjays of the left.

The president is immune from prosecution while in office for official duities. Seems it was always that way, but the DOJ controlled it, rather than an official law. Now it's official, but in reality, nothing has changed, except that the left now have to play by the rules that have existed over the years.

If a president does something wrong, something he could be arrested for, he isn't some King, or omnipotent ruler, he's just the president. He can be impeached, and if found guilty by the Senate, removed from office. Once removed, he can be arrested, tried, and jailed if the crime warrants. This is always been the case, and all the hyperbole from the idiots won't change the facts.

But, this does stop the election interfereance the left has been doing against Trump, since they don't have a viable candidate, nor a way to win the next election.

Manhattan Prosecutors Agree to Delay Trump’s Sentencing

Manhattan prosecutors on Tuesday agreed with Donald J. Trump’s request to postpone his criminal sentencing so that the judge overseeing the case could weigh whether a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling might imperil his conviction, new court filings show.

It is up to the judge to determine whether to postpone the sentencing, though with both sides in agreement, a delay seemed likely. The judge, Juan M. Merchan, could rule as soon as Tuesday.

A delay would represent a surprising setback for the case, which led to the first conviction of an American president. The sentencing was likely to be the only moment of criminal accountability for the twice-impeached and four-time indicted former president whose other cases are mired in delay.

NYT

Why is the DA suddenly being so accommodating to the Trump legal defense?

Would the DA be this accommodating if Biden was a stronger candidate for President? Are they now worried they are carrying the water for a person who has a good chance of lossing and won't be around to protect them from accusations and investigation? Did they do the math and decided that it would be best for this case to just go away?

Especially given the fact that this case seems to have bolster Trump's chances of winning and not decease his chances of winning. Democrats like to eat their own, the DA and judge might be worried they will be blamed for Trump’s victory .

originally posted by: Dandandat3
the DA and judge might be worried they will be blamed for Trump’s victory .

they should be. they had a big part in the current surge of cash and voters. The only thing they could do now to help out, would be to give him a jail sentence. It looks like that won't be happening.