Infowars fighting attempted shutdown

a reply to: UKTruth

They start with what will make them feel good and then shape all logic into a pretzel in order to justify their feel good state of mind.

Also...

People claim free speech and that they can say anything but then call for the death of people like Abu Hamza who was trying to inspire Muslim terrorism with his words.
Can't have it both ways.

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: UKTruth

Somehow it will be different.
These people are all the same.

And idiots will be idiots.....

Speaking for myself, you and I are in perfect 100% alignment on that statement!!!

Cheers!

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: UKTruth

Somehow it will be different.
These people are all the same.

And idiots will be idiots.....

Demonstrably.....

You sure did show that!!

originally posted by: Kurokage

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: UKTruth

Somehow it will be different.
These people are all the same.

And idiots will be idiots.....

Demonstrably.....

You sure did!!

That's certainly one perspective.

Another is where one is put into a position to fully explain exactly how they are wrong on not only the law but its applicability.....

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: UKTruth

Somehow it will be different.
These people are all the same.

And idiots will be idiots.....

Demonstrably.....

Indeed.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

So who's business got destroyed from Alex Jones words? How were people 'harmed'?

Wow! I'm done here. This is pointless.

Do you believe that the people of Sandy Hook were crisis actors and that their children never died?

Imagine being in their shoes.
You've just lost a child in a school massacre and someone has now named and 'shamed' you of trying to fool the American public of being part of a false flag event to the world? Now hundreds and possbly thousands of people are sending you hate mail to your home and business, urinating on you childs grave and threatening to dig it up to prove you're lying? constantly attacking any sign of you online, and this was over years. Would you not care that your family are having people confront them? Would that not cause you anguish?
All because Alex Jones has made libel and slanderous statements. The age of the internet has changed the 'power' of the rumour.
I don't see this has a freedom of speech problem, I see it as someone being held responsable for what they publish.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Kurokage

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: UKTruth

Somehow it will be different.
These people are all the same.

And idiots will be idiots.....

Demonstrably.....

You sure did!!

That's certainly one perspective.

Another is where one is put into a position to fully explain exactly how they are wrong on not only the law but its applicability.....

Yeah, I get that you're iggnorant of what libel and slander means. Are you going to keep proving me right?

originally posted by: Kurokage

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Kurokage

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: UKTruth

Somehow it will be different.
These people are all the same.

And idiots will be idiots.....

Demonstrably.....

You sure did!!

That's certainly one perspective.

Another is where one is put into a position to fully explain exactly how they are wrong on not only the law but its applicability.....

Yeah, I get that you're iggnorant of what libel and slander means. Are you going to keep proving me right?

Your words:

Alex Jones inspired his listeners throught the use of slander and libel to threaten the people of SandyHook. Jones claims his site is a 'Free' news site not controlled by the goverment. He used that as a weapon on gulible people to impact the lives of those impacted by the SandyHook massacre.

This sure is fun!

a reply to: JinMI

I asked you a simple question and all you've done is try to appear intelligent by insulting me, which has had the opposite effect.

Alex Jones claimed on Infowars, that Sandy Hook was a false flag operation created by the US government so they could take away Ameica's guns.

And still after many replies you haven't answered a simple question.

a reply to: JinMI

This sure is fun!

Yes, it sure is fun as you clearly dont understand what defermation is!!

Alex Jones was sued for defamation. His articles were slanderous and libel. I'm sorry you're having difficulty understanding.....

Defamation is a legal term that refers to any false statement that causes harm to another person’s reputation or character. Defamation can be written (libel) or spoken (slander)

a reply to: Kurokage

I asked you a simple question and all you've done is try to appear intelligent by insulting me, which has had the opposite effect.

You've been here longer than me. If I was intelligent, you'd know it. Yet I'm happy to hear you infer my demeaning of your arguments as a personal insult

And still after many replies you haven't answered a simple question.

Except I have.

For the third time, are you familiar with the Maddow defense?

a reply to: JinMI

So after mutiple post of me asking you a question with no answer, you expect me to answer you. My reply would get me banned from here, but you get the idea....

a reply to: Kurokage

So you've again run out of road in your logic.

Perfect because that's the result you were destined for and I wanted to highlight.

If you knew what the Maddow defense was, you'd at least understand my side, the current legal side, of this conversation.

You'd also know that the actions of a third party doesn't constitute slander or libel.....

a reply to: JinMI

I know what the Madodow Defence was/is. My question was simple so idiots would understand.....

Alex Jones claimed on Infowars, that Sandy Hook was a false flag operation created by the US government so they could take away Ameica's guns.

Did you believe this?

a reply to: Kurokage

I know what the Madodow Defence was/is. My question was simple so idiots would understand.....

Ah, I see. I am a moron. Not to be confused with the high status of the idiots here.

No, I don't believe Jones. I'll say it again because while you're speaking to idiots, I only understand moron.....

I'm not a fan of Jones. I don't listen to his stuff. It does however you hold him high in both status and regard as to give him such credence as to justify a 1.5 billion dollar defamation liability.

a reply to: JinMI

You seem to want to defend Jones because of your misunderstanding of the case and the fact he was found gulity of defamation....

The Infowars host has already been found liable in lawsuits filed by the families of the Sandy Hook school shooting victims. A trial this week will determine how much he owes them.


The parents say Mr. Jones’s lies have added to their devastation and his followers have continued to harass them, threatening their safety nearly a decade since the shooting.

Veronique De La Rosa, the mother of Noah Pozner, the youngest victim, said in an interview in 2018 that she had moved nearly 10 times since the shooting and lived in hiding. Each time the family moved, conspiracists would rapidly publish the new home address, she said.

“I would love to go see my son’s grave, and I don’t get to do that,” Ms. De La Rosa said.

a reply to: JinMI

No, I don't believe Jones. I'll say it again because while you're speaking to idiots, I only understand moron.....

Thank you, after 3 pages of you ranting about another case and some insults you finally answered what I asked.

a reply to: Kurokage

So you did believe him then?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Kurokage

So you did believe him then?

No I didn't believe Jones and I also believed he was being Slanderous and libel.

originally posted by: Kurokage

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Kurokage

So you did believe him then?

No I didn't believe Jones and I also believed he was being Slanderous and libel.

Your ignorance perfectly demonstrated yet again.

I thank you