The verdict is in.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Conspiracy Alert!

How many jurors were threatened with death to them and their families while "deliberating"?

I imagine many will receive some from MAGA nation if their identities will get out.

Sorry, we aren't democrats.

You don’t think there will be any? Seriously? Pretty sure the judge and his family received them during the trial.

a reply to: EndTime

Officer Fanone's 78-year old mother was swatted shortly after his appearance with de Niro the other day.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Lazy88

He was found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business documents in the first degree. It is a Class A felony that carries a maximum sentence of four years.

Where does it say that in the New York code of law.

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

34 felony counts of falsifying business records, my bad.

LoL

Its late.

But Trump will still be guilty come morning.

Night'night.

And if his conviction is overturned?

Then all those people who threatened to take up arms to "defend their country" will be demonstrated to be 'full of it', and the alleged unfairness and corruption of the system will be totally disproven.

a reply to: Threadbarer

First, a refresher on how the misdemeanor case becomes a felony. The misdemeanor charge of falsifying business records in the second degree says that a person is guilty when, with intent to defraud, he “makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an enterprise.” The first-degree felony charge says that the state must prove that the intent to defraud “includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.”

www.msnbc.com...

Listing for paying a lawyer to obtain a NDA as a legal fee with the amounts accurate has no intent to defraud.

Trump wasn’t convicted of any other crimes.

And “the commission” was to obtain a NDA which is legal to do.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: rigel4

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Lumenari


Stupid people don't learn from history, so here we are.

I disagree Little Sister.

Very evil people HAVE learned from history and are deliberately repeating it.

That would be Trump and his MAGA following sir

Surely you have your tenses confused?

"Make Ameristan Gulag Again" is referring to some vague ill-defined (and unhistorical) past greatness.

"MAGA is coming" would then be 'Make Ameristan Gulag Again is coming' which makes no sense in English or even in Ameristani.

a reply to: EndTime

I don’t think that was his point.

a reply to: Lazy88

Sorry. Had my classifications backwards. It's a Class E felony.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

SECTION 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree
Types of Criminal Cases

a reply to: Threadbarer

Is the summation false.

First, a refresher on how the misdemeanor case becomes a felony. The misdemeanor charge of falsifying business records in the second degree says that a person is guilty when, with intent to defraud, he “makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an enterprise.” The first-degree felony charge says that the state must prove that the intent to defraud “includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.”

www.msnbc.com...

Listing for paying a lawyer to obtain a NDA as a legal fee with the amounts accurate has no intent to defraud.

Trump wasn’t convicted of any other crimes.

And “the commission” was to obtain a NDA which is legal to do.

they just gave trump the white house

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Lazy88

Expedited appeal incoming

Obviously an appeal is coming and it would probably end up being successful but how long it will take I don't know.

I do know the Supreme Court can hear certain cases before they go through the process but I don't know the rules regarding that.

a reply to: Lazy88

Cohen's payment to Stormy was ruled an illegal campaign contribution in his own case. However, that statute in this case does not require the predicate crime to be tried and convicted.

It only requires the jury to believe the predicate crime was mens rea for the falsification of documents.

a reply to: Threadbarer

Wasn’t there a statute of limitations somewhere?

a reply to: Threadbarer

Out of all of the insane cultists, I figured you would be the only one to have the balls to tell us you knew it was a scam trial.

Seeing as you have the balls to pretend you know something about law.

a reply to: Topcraft

Only if Trump was being charged with falsification of business records in the second degree, which is a misdemeanor.

a reply to: Threadbarer

Which has what to do with Trump presumed innocent until proven guilty with no evidence that Trump conspired with Cohen to commit a crime. With no evidence the Trump Organization tried to commit fraud when they paid legal fees to a lawyer for obtaining a NDA. NDAs used by numerous other politicians.

a reply to: Lazy88

The prosecution presented over 200 exhibits of evidence and called 20 witnesses to support their case. In the end, it was enough to convince 12 jurors that Trump was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Good luck with the first Appeals Court...... 😃


Appellate Division, First Department

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
How is a convicted felon going to be able to stand on the World stage and be able to address other World leaders without being laughed at? Assuming he is elected.

The US would be a pariah state and would be an international laughing stock.

We've had a dementia riden POTUS that can't speak coherently and craps his pants for 31/2 years, so it seems we're already the laughing stock of the world.

Trump won't be POTUS. If they can't keep him off the ballot and they can't Dominion/Mule a win Trump will be offed befor January 2025.

The uniparty is in charge now, and has been since 2016.

a reply to: RazorV66

How can it be a scam trial, when it’s so blatantly obvious he did what he was accused of?