Guilty-NOT Guilty-Hung Jury---Last Chance to Make Your NY v. Trump Verdict Prediction

originally posted by: tanstaafl
What is it called again when you keep doing the same thing over and over expecting different results?

I think the word you're looking for is "insanity."

a reply to: Threadbarer

Hmmm, I read the prosecutor spoke for 5 hours today in continuing closing arguments from yesterday.

I'll try to find it.

Food 4 Thought: The Supreme Court has ruled ONLY CONGRESS (the House) can remove a Presidential candidate from the ballot.

Jury has sent another note to re-hear jury instructions.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
Jury has sent another note to re-hear jury instructions.

This crazy spaghetti is not meant for average people: www.cnn.com...

George Soros sure got his money's worth out of Alvin Bragg.

Question did they ever actually articulate what the crime was that elevated this to a felony?

Honestly haven't followed that closely, spring time in Alaska is a busy time of year.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
Question did they ever actually articulate what the crime was that elevated this to a felony?

No. They told them to pick among several options.

Which is probably a violation of the 6th Amendment.

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: Threadbarer
Jury has sent another note to re-hear jury instructions.

This crazy spaghetti is not meant for average people: www.cnn.com...

The instructions match the case: house of cards.

a reply to: Mahogani

Steinglass' marathon summation concluded last night around 8 pm. The jury were given the option to split it up between days but they wanted to get it done.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: budzprime69
a reply to: pianopraze

I see a man that wants complete control and demands yes men.

Yes men are always a Red Flag for me.

You need to punctuate so that tour misandrist tendencies ate more clearly defined.

originally posted by: YourFaceAgain

originally posted by: Irishhaf
Question did they ever actually articulate what the crime was that elevated this to a felony?

No. They told them to pick among several options.

...and the Judge says they don't have to all agree on which option.

Jury deliberations to be continued tomorrow.

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

Huh, kinda hard to know how to defend yourself if all the charges aren't outlined.

Banana...

originally posted by: Dalamax

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: budzprime69
a reply to: pianopraze

I see a man that wants complete control and demands yes men.

Yes men are always a Red Flag for me.

You need to punctuate so that tour misandrist tendencies ate more clearly defined.

Stop your mansplaining!

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: YourFaceAgain

originally posted by: Irishhaf
Question did they ever actually articulate what the crime was that elevated this to a felony?

No. They told them to pick among several options.

...and the Judge says they don't have to all agree on which option.

And the prosecution wasn't required to separately prove those charges.

The case sounds unconstitutional to me.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: YourFaceAgain

Huh, kinda hard to know how to defend yourself if all the charges aren't outlined.

Banana...

Yes, which is why the 6th Amendment forbids this type of 3rd world nonsense.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: YourFaceAgain

Huh, kinda hard to know how to defend yourself if all the charges aren't outlined.

Banana...

It's much like giving the guy in front of the firing squad a blindfold to defend himself.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: frogs453

Don't forget Barr and Durham killing the investigation into Trump after Italy reported to them they had credible evidence of Trump breaking the law.

It's a shame the democrats didn't get power back to control the DOJ and use it to go against Trump. That would have enabled them to investigate Kushner and jail Trump for all the crimes he's comitted over the years. Like paying his lawyer.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Mahogani

Steinglass' marathon summation concluded last night around 8 pm. The jury were given the option to split it up between days but they wanted to get it done.

Thanks, I have not been able to find it anyway. Think it was CNN I read it on, 5 hours of continued arguments today starting around Noon.

Either I read it wrong or they reported it wrong and it's been retracted.

TY