The biggest problem with the Hush money trial

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: CarlLaFong

That is bad. Your Justice system is broken.

Yes it is.
Intentionally broken.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

I have to agree.

a reply to: Annee

Yeahbut it's against the law to do what he did. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Cohen on his way back to court. Get the sandwiches ready 😃🤣🤣

Direct conflict by Merchan. He gave money to Biden who is running for President against the Defendant Trump. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Annee

Yeahbut it's against the law to do what he did. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

But he went to the ethics committee, and it was cleared before the trial.

Go after the committee.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Direct conflict by Merchan. He gave money to Biden who is running for President against the Defendant Trump. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

In NYC that'll just get you a 'CAUTION' from the Ethics Board.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Annee

Yeahbut it's against the law to do what he did. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

But he went to the ethics committee, and it was cleared before the trial.

Go after the committee.

WHY did they give him a 'CAUTION' if what he did was just fine?

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Annee

Yeahbut it's against the law to do what he did. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

But he went to the ethics committee, and it was cleared before the trial.

Go after the committee.

WHY did they give him a 'CAUTION' if what he did was just fine?

And then he was cleared by the committee.

Ask the committee.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Annee

Yeahbut it's against the law to do what he did. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

But he went to the ethics committee, and it was cleared before the trial.

Go after the committee.

The Judge has no ethics. He is a conflicted phony 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You need to go after the committee, not me.

JUST NOW...
Merchan refuses to allow a new piece of defense evidence in.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Annee

Yeahbut it's against the law to do what he did. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

But he went to the ethics committee, and it was cleared before the trial.

Go after the committee.

The Judge has no ethics. He is a conflicted phony 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You need to go after the committee, not me.

Says the pro-Trump supporter.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Annee

Yeahbut it's against the law to do what he did. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

But he went to the ethics committee, and it was cleared before the trial.

Go after the committee.

WHY did they give him a 'CAUTION' if what he did was just fine?

And then he was cleared by the committee.

Ask the committee.

The committee slapped him with a 'CAUTION'...because what Merchan did indicated a conflict.

originally posted by: Annee

Says the pro-Trump supporter.

I"m not a Pro-Trump supporter and I say the same thing.
This judge broke rules and donated to Joe Bidens election fund.
He absolutely is conflicted and shouldn't be in charge of this trial.

JUST NOW:
Merchan refuses to allow a new Defense witness, Brad Smith.
He says it would confuse the jurors.

Edt...Merchan will NOW only allow Smith to testify under very strict guidelines.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Annee

Yeahbut it's against the law to do what he did. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

But he went to the ethics committee, and it was cleared before the trial.

Go after the committee.

Here you are still defending Democrat corruption.

It’s a common theme with you, not sure if you just don’t know what the hell you are talking about or you just don’t care that they are corrupt, lying criminals because Orange Man Bad hurt you so much.

I’ll ask again but I don’t expect an answer from you or any of the other low info cult members, where are the charges from the Federal Election Commission?
The government entity that is actually tasked with enforcing illegal campaign contributions?

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Annee

Yeahbut it's against the law to do what he did. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

But he went to the ethics committee, and it was cleared before the trial.

Go after the committee.

Here you are still defending Democrat corruption.

It’s a common theme with you, not sure if you just don’t know what the hell you are talking about or you just don’t care that they are corrupt, lying criminals because Orange Man Bad hurt you so much.

I’ll ask again but I don’t expect an answer from you or any of the other low info cult members, where are the charges from the Federal Election Commission?
The government entity that is actually tasked with enforcing illegal campaign contributions?

And here you still are with your insults.

I am not a Democrat -- and I am not defending anyone.

I am stating fact.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

What was that about?

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
JUST NOW:
Merchan refuses to allow a new Defense witness, Brad Smith.
He says it would confuse the jurors.

Edt...Merchan will NOW only allow Smith to testify under very strict guidelines.

Oh, look.

Another pro-Trumper. Poor Trumpy.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: CarlLaFong

What was that about?

Brad Smith is an election law expert.