The biggest problem with the Hush money trial

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs

COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the IRS, made false statements to a federally-insured financial institution in connection with a $500,000 home equity loan, and, in 2016, caused $280,000 in payments to be made to silence two women who otherwise planned to speak publicly about their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate, thereby intending to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Source

There ya see. Trump wasn't involved in the payoffs (extortions) 😀

How did you even get that from what I posted? There was nothing about whether Trump was involved or not.

It simply just proves that there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. Now it’s up to the jury to decide if Trump was involved.

no, Cohen pled guilty. Big difference.

So what? He was still convicted of a crime for his part in the hush money payments, which puts a big hole in your claim that there is no crime.

Trump is on trial. And "evidence" presented by the prosecutors is weaker by 100x than evidence presented by The Defense.

Do you really believe that?

They’ve proven there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. So all the prosecution really has to do is convince the jury that Trump knew about it.

Trump not guilty of crimes committed by others. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crimes committed on behalf of Trump, which Trump reimbursed Cohen for… his personal signature is on the checks.

Not proven Trump did anything illegal.

That is up to the jury.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs

COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the IRS, made false statements to a federally-insured financial institution in connection with a $500,000 home equity loan, and, in 2016, caused $280,000 in payments to be made to silence two women who otherwise planned to speak publicly about their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate, thereby intending to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Source

There ya see. Trump wasn't involved in the payoffs (extortions) 😀

How did you even get that from what I posted? There was nothing about whether Trump was involved or not.

It simply just proves that there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. Now it’s up to the jury to decide if Trump was involved.

no, Cohen pled guilty. Big difference.

So what? He was still convicted of a crime for his part in the hush money payments, which puts a big hole in your claim that there is no crime.

Trump is on trial. And "evidence" presented by the prosecutors is weaker by 100x than evidence presented by The Defense.

Do you really believe that?

They’ve proven there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. So all the prosecution really has to do is convince the jury that Trump knew about it.

Trump not guilty of crimes committed by others. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crimes committed on behalf of Trump, which Trump reimbursed Cohen for… his personal signature is on the checks.

Not proven Trump did anything illegal.
And no tie to prove Trump ordered the alleged "illegal" accounting entries.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crime committed for the purpose of influencing the 2016 election has been proven, Trump reimbursing Cohen for said crime has been proven.

Then you have Cohens testimony, which (if the jury believe him) proves that Trump knew of the crime and was directly involved.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs

COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the IRS, made false statements to a federally-insured financial institution in connection with a $500,000 home equity loan, and, in 2016, caused $280,000 in payments to be made to silence two women who otherwise planned to speak publicly about their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate, thereby intending to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Source

There ya see. Trump wasn't involved in the payoffs (extortions) 😀

How did you even get that from what I posted? There was nothing about whether Trump was involved or not.

It simply just proves that there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. Now it’s up to the jury to decide if Trump was involved.

no, Cohen pled guilty. Big difference.

So what? He was still convicted of a crime for his part in the hush money payments, which puts a big hole in your claim that there is no crime.

Trump is on trial. And "evidence" presented by the prosecutors is weaker by 100x than evidence presented by The Defense.

Do you really believe that?

They’ve proven there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. So all the prosecution really has to do is convince the jury that Trump knew about it.

Trump not guilty of crimes committed by others. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crimes committed on behalf of Trump, which Trump reimbursed Cohen for… his personal signature is on the checks.

Not proven Trump did anything illegal.

That is up to the jury.

Who said it wasn't? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs

COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the IRS, made false statements to a federally-insured financial institution in connection with a $500,000 home equity loan, and, in 2016, caused $280,000 in payments to be made to silence two women who otherwise planned to speak publicly about their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate, thereby intending to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Source

There ya see. Trump wasn't involved in the payoffs (extortions) 😀

How did you even get that from what I posted? There was nothing about whether Trump was involved or not.

It simply just proves that there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. Now it’s up to the jury to decide if Trump was involved.

no, Cohen pled guilty. Big difference.

So what? He was still convicted of a crime for his part in the hush money payments, which puts a big hole in your claim that there is no crime.

Trump is on trial. And "evidence" presented by the prosecutors is weaker by 100x than evidence presented by The Defense.

Do you really believe that?

They’ve proven there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. So all the prosecution really has to do is convince the jury that Trump knew about it.

Trump not guilty of crimes committed by others. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crimes committed on behalf of Trump, which Trump reimbursed Cohen for… his personal signature is on the checks.

Not proven Trump did anything illegal.
And no tie to prove Trump ordered the alleged "illegal" accounting entries.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crime committed for the purpose of influencing the 2016 election has been proven, Trump reimbursing Cohen for said crime has been proven.

Then you have Cohens testimony, which (if the jury believe him) proves that Trump knew of the crime and was directly involved.

It's really not that difficult.

Comes down to what the jury believes and decides.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs

COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the IRS, made false statements to a federally-insured financial institution in connection with a $500,000 home equity loan, and, in 2016, caused $280,000 in payments to be made to silence two women who otherwise planned to speak publicly about their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate, thereby intending to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Source

There ya see. Trump wasn't involved in the payoffs (extortions) 😀

How did you even get that from what I posted? There was nothing about whether Trump was involved or not.

It simply just proves that there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. Now it’s up to the jury to decide if Trump was involved.

no, Cohen pled guilty. Big difference.

So what? He was still convicted of a crime for his part in the hush money payments, which puts a big hole in your claim that there is no crime.

Trump is on trial. And "evidence" presented by the prosecutors is weaker by 100x than evidence presented by The Defense.

Do you really believe that?

They’ve proven there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. So all the prosecution really has to do is convince the jury that Trump knew about it.

Trump not guilty of crimes committed by others. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crimes committed on behalf of Trump, which Trump reimbursed Cohen for… his personal signature is on the checks.

Not proven Trump did anything illegal.

That is up to the jury.

Who said it wasn't? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You're not on the jury.

So, your claims are just speculation from your perspective.

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs

COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the IRS, made false statements to a federally-insured financial institution in connection with a $500,000 home equity loan, and, in 2016, caused $280,000 in payments to be made to silence two women who otherwise planned to speak publicly about their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate, thereby intending to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Source

There ya see. Trump wasn't involved in the payoffs (extortions) 😀

How did you even get that from what I posted? There was nothing about whether Trump was involved or not.

It simply just proves that there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. Now it’s up to the jury to decide if Trump was involved.

no, Cohen pled guilty. Big difference.

So what? He was still convicted of a crime for his part in the hush money payments, which puts a big hole in your claim that there is no crime.

Trump is on trial. And "evidence" presented by the prosecutors is weaker by 100x than evidence presented by The Defense.

Do you really believe that?

They’ve proven there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. So all the prosecution really has to do is convince the jury that Trump knew about it.

Trump not guilty of crimes committed by others. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crimes committed on behalf of Trump, which Trump reimbursed Cohen for… his personal signature is on the checks.

Not proven Trump did anything illegal.
And no tie to prove Trump ordered the alleged "illegal" accounting entries.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crime committed for the purpose of influencing the 2016 election has been proven, Trump reimbursing Cohen for said crime has been proven.

Then you have Cohens testimony, which (if the jury believe him) proves that Trump knew of the crime and was directly involved.

The invoices were generated by Cohen, not Trump. No proof Trump knew Cohens "intentions" (other than the extorsion attempt(s)) 😃

And The Fed Election Commission ruled different. 🤣🤣

Reasonable Doubt is manifest

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs

COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the IRS, made false statements to a federally-insured financial institution in connection with a $500,000 home equity loan, and, in 2016, caused $280,000 in payments to be made to silence two women who otherwise planned to speak publicly about their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate, thereby intending to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Source

There ya see. Trump wasn't involved in the payoffs (extortions) 😀

How did you even get that from what I posted? There was nothing about whether Trump was involved or not.

It simply just proves that there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. Now it’s up to the jury to decide if Trump was involved.

no, Cohen pled guilty. Big difference.

So what? He was still convicted of a crime for his part in the hush money payments, which puts a big hole in your claim that there is no crime.

Trump is on trial. And "evidence" presented by the prosecutors is weaker by 100x than evidence presented by The Defense.

Do you really believe that?

They’ve proven there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. So all the prosecution really has to do is convince the jury that Trump knew about it.

Trump not guilty of crimes committed by others. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crimes committed on behalf of Trump, which Trump reimbursed Cohen for… his personal signature is on the checks.

Not proven Trump did anything illegal.

That is up to the jury.

Who said it wasn't? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You're not on the jury.

So, your claims are just speculation from your perspective.

Getting testy now are we? Just like Cohen and the prosecutors. Cohen turns into a turkey sandwich by Tuesday. 🤣🤣🤣

Reasonable Doubt is manifest.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs

COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the IRS, made false statements to a federally-insured financial institution in connection with a $500,000 home equity loan, and, in 2016, caused $280,000 in payments to be made to silence two women who otherwise planned to speak publicly about their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate, thereby intending to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Source

There ya see. Trump wasn't involved in the payoffs (extortions) 😀

How did you even get that from what I posted? There was nothing about whether Trump was involved or not.

It simply just proves that there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. Now it’s up to the jury to decide if Trump was involved.

no, Cohen pled guilty. Big difference.

So what? He was still convicted of a crime for his part in the hush money payments, which puts a big hole in your claim that there is no crime.

Trump is on trial. And "evidence" presented by the prosecutors is weaker by 100x than evidence presented by The Defense.

Do you really believe that?

They’ve proven there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. So all the prosecution really has to do is convince the jury that Trump knew about it.

Trump not guilty of crimes committed by others. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crimes committed on behalf of Trump, which Trump reimbursed Cohen for… his personal signature is on the checks.

Not proven Trump did anything illegal.

That is up to the jury.

Who said it wasn't? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You're not on the jury.

So, your claims are just speculation from your perspective.

Getting testy now are we? Just like Cohen and the prosecutors. Cohen turns into a turkey sandwich by Tuesday. 🤣🤣🤣

Reasonable Doubt is manifest.

There are no emotions transferred via internet typing. Unless specifically spelled out.

If you are feeling some -- they are your own.

Cohen has a lot of stuff going on. He may be the actual winner in all this.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs

COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the IRS, made false statements to a federally-insured financial institution in connection with a $500,000 home equity loan, and, in 2016, caused $280,000 in payments to be made to silence two women who otherwise planned to speak publicly about their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate, thereby intending to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Source

There ya see. Trump wasn't involved in the payoffs (extortions) 😀

How did you even get that from what I posted? There was nothing about whether Trump was involved or not.

It simply just proves that there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. Now it’s up to the jury to decide if Trump was involved.

no, Cohen pled guilty. Big difference.

So what? He was still convicted of a crime for his part in the hush money payments, which puts a big hole in your claim that there is no crime.

Trump is on trial. And "evidence" presented by the prosecutors is weaker by 100x than evidence presented by The Defense.

Do you really believe that?

They’ve proven there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. So all the prosecution really has to do is convince the jury that Trump knew about it.

Trump not guilty of crimes committed by others. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crimes committed on behalf of Trump, which Trump reimbursed Cohen for… his personal signature is on the checks.

Not proven Trump did anything illegal.

That is up to the jury.

Who said it wasn't? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You're not on the jury.

So, your claims are just speculation from your perspective.

Getting testy now are we? Just like Cohen and the prosecutors. Cohen turns into a turkey sandwich by Tuesday. 🤣🤣🤣

Reasonable Doubt is manifest.

There are no emotions transferred via internet typing. Unless specifically spelled out.

If you are feeling some -- they are your own.

Cohen has a lot of stuff going on. He may be the actual winner in all this.

What stuff would make Cohen a "winner" in all this?? 😀

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: matafuchs

COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the IRS, made false statements to a federally-insured financial institution in connection with a $500,000 home equity loan, and, in 2016, caused $280,000 in payments to be made to silence two women who otherwise planned to speak publicly about their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate, thereby intending to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Source

There ya see. Trump wasn't involved in the payoffs (extortions) 😀

How did you even get that from what I posted? There was nothing about whether Trump was involved or not.

It simply just proves that there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. Now it’s up to the jury to decide if Trump was involved.

no, Cohen pled guilty. Big difference.

So what? He was still convicted of a crime for his part in the hush money payments, which puts a big hole in your claim that there is no crime.

Trump is on trial. And "evidence" presented by the prosecutors is weaker by 100x than evidence presented by The Defense.

Do you really believe that?

They’ve proven there was a crime committed, which Cohen has already been convicted of. So all the prosecution really has to do is convince the jury that Trump knew about it.

Trump not guilty of crimes committed by others. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Crimes committed on behalf of Trump, which Trump reimbursed Cohen for… his personal signature is on the checks.

Not proven Trump did anything illegal.

That is up to the jury.

Who said it wasn't? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You're not on the jury.

So, your claims are just speculation from your perspective.

Getting testy now are we? Just like Cohen and the prosecutors. Cohen turns into a turkey sandwich by Tuesday. 🤣🤣🤣

Reasonable Doubt is manifest.

There are no emotions transferred via internet typing. Unless specifically spelled out.

If you are feeling some -- they are your own.

Cohen has a lot of stuff going on. He may be the actual winner in all this.

What stuff would make Cohen a "winner" in all this?? 😀

Cohen has already lost -- and is now re-building his life. He has a lot going on.

Trump still has this trial and several more. I don't think Trump is going to recover.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee

" Not really.

It's about illegal campaign contributions. "


Oh , and so the Evidence for that is Very Damning for Mr. Trump then ?

What is the trial for?

That's just It . What Is the Trial For ?

To clear up all your “know-it-all” responses — I suppose.

I cannot Unknow what I Know Annee , and Neither can you it Seems..........

a reply to: Annee

This Trial is Nothing more than a Feeble attempt of Election Interference and Smearing Mr. Trump's Name . CONFIRMED.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee

This Trial is Nothing more than a Feeble attempt of Election Interference and Smearing Mr. Trump's Name . CONFIRMED.

Thank you for your opinion.

I think Trump has done a great job smirching himself.

dp

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee

" Not really.

It's about illegal campaign contributions. "


Oh , and so the Evidence for that is Very Damning for Mr. Trump then ?

What is the trial for?

That's just It . What Is the Trial For ?

To clear up all your “know-it-all” responses — I suppose.

I cannot Unknow what I Know Annee , and Neither can you it Seems..........

You have an opinion.

"Know" is questionable.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee

This Trial is Nothing more than a Feeble attempt of Election Interference and Smearing Mr. Trump's Name . CONFIRMED.

Thank you for your opinion.

I think Trump has done a great job smirching himself.

It's Not my Opinion , but the Majority of the " Publics " . Did you even watch the Video ? Hmm......

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee

This Trial is Nothing more than a Feeble attempt of Election Interference and Smearing Mr. Trump's Name . CONFIRMED.

Thank you for your opinion.

I think Trump has done a great job smirching himself.

It's Not my Opinion , but the Majority of the " Publics " . Did you even watch the Video ? Hmm......

You can say "some" or "many".

You have no ability or reference to declare a majority.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee

This Trial is Nothing more than a Feeble attempt of Election Interference and Smearing Mr. Trump's Name . CONFIRMED.

That whole video is just blatant mud slinging against Cohen and his credibility hoping something sticks. Problem is, he’s been cross examined for over 14 hours now and hasn’t been caught lying once.

End of the day it all comes down to how the jury perceives Cohens testimony and the defense haven’t been able to rip apart Cohens claims as of yet.

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee

This Trial is Nothing more than a Feeble attempt of Election Interference and Smearing Mr. Trump's Name . CONFIRMED.

That whole video is just blatant mud slinging against Cohen and his credibility hoping something sticks. Problem is, he’s been cross examined for over 14 hours now and hasn’t been caught lying once.

End of the day it all comes down to how the jury perceives Cohens testimony and the defense haven’t been able to rip apart Cohens claims as of yet.

How much they paying you to post this drivel?

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee

This Trial is Nothing more than a Feeble attempt of Election Interference and Smearing Mr. Trump's Name . CONFIRMED.

That whole video is just blatant mud slinging against Cohen and his credibility hoping something sticks. Problem is, he’s been cross examined for over 14 hours now and hasn’t been caught lying once.

End of the day it all comes down to how the jury perceives Cohens testimony and the defense haven’t been able to rip apart Cohens claims as of yet.

How much they paying you to post this drivel?

Someone will pay me for doing something I enjoy? Where do I sign up?