It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee
Cohen is simply a rat.
And a convicted fraudulent businessman, tax cheat and perjurer.
BEHOLD, the prosecution's STAR witness!
You wanna try him for other misdeeds? Go ahead.
That is not what this trial is about.
I believe him in regards to THIS TRIAL.
The prosecution hinges on Cohen's credibility and veracity...which has already been legally proven to be completely lacking.
So has Trump's.
Trump is not the prosecution's star witness. Cohen is.
So, Trump’s just hanging out in a courtroom, with a jury, cuz it’s a good place to take a nap?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MrGashler
a reply to: Annee
.......and? What does her being Ukranian have anything to do with ties to the Russian mob? Do you think the Russian mob doesn't do business in Ukraine?
Her Ukranian family is more likely to be connected (in some way) to Russia -- than if she was Filipino.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee
Cohen is simply a rat.
And a convicted fraudulent businessman, tax cheat and perjurer.
BEHOLD, the prosecution's STAR witness!
You wanna try him for other misdeeds? Go ahead.
That is not what this trial is about.
I believe him in regards to THIS TRIAL.
The prosecution hinges on Cohen's credibility and veracity...which has already been legally proven to be completely lacking.
So has Trump's.
Trump is not the prosecution's star witness. Cohen is.
So, Trump’s just hanging out in a courtroom, with a jury, cuz it’s a good place to take a nap?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee
Cohen is simply a rat.
And a convicted fraudulent businessman, tax cheat and perjurer.
BEHOLD, the prosecution's STAR witness!
You wanna try him for other misdeeds? Go ahead.
That is not what this trial is about.
I believe him in regards to THIS TRIAL.
The prosecution hinges on Cohen's credibility and veracity...which has already been legally proven to be completely lacking.
So has Trump's.
Trump is not the prosecution's star witness. Cohen is.
So, Trump’s just hanging out in a courtroom, with a jury, cuz it’s a good place to take a nap?
- An April 25, 2023, US Justice Department Memorandum of Understanding with the Federal Election Commission leaves Bragg powerless to prosecute this matter. "The Department has exclusive jurisdiction over criminal enforcement of the federal campaign finance laws," the memorandum states. "The Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over civil enforcement," the memo also says. Nowhere does this federal rule grant local prosecutors authority to enforce federal election laws. Thus, Bragg’s case is a shack built atop a cloud of helium.
- Bragg indicted Trump on April 4, 2023, four months after the statute of limitations expired on the corresponding Class E felonies.
- Bragg skirted the statute of limitations by claiming that Trump falsified business records to commit a second violation. After three weeks of this trial, that second crime remains a mystery.
- Prosecutors described a "catch-and-kill scheme" through which the National Enquirer bought the rights to stories that might embarrass Trump and then buried them. Rather than a plot to influence the 2020 election, the Enquirer routinely caught and killed stories about Trump and other newsmakers, including former Obama Chief of Staff and current Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel, actors Arnold Schwarzenegger and Mark Wahlberg, and golf star Tiger Woods. More important, "catch and kill" might be dodgy, but it is not illegal.
- Former nude thespian Stormy Daniels signed a non-disclosure agreement promising quietude about consensual sex that Trump and, at various times, Daniels deny ever sharing. NDAs are perfectly legal. I have signed at least three (while dressed), and non-disclosure language has appeared in numerous contracts I have endorsed. Confidential out-of-court settlements operate similarly and legally.
- Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen paid Daniels to clam up about her alleged intimacy with Trump. Again, sex or no sex, it is legal to pay people to ignore journalists (although buying silence before law enforcement is obstruction of justice).
- Trump’s checks allegedly reimbursed Cohen for payments to Daniels. It is perfectly legal for a client to repay his attorney funds advanced in a lawful transaction.
- Bragg claims that Trump should have paid for this private matter with campaign cash. That would have been illegal. Instead, Trump legally used his own money. Trump faces 34 counts of alleged falsification of business records because his bookkeepers posted ledger entries for checks to Cohen as "legal expenses." Would Bragg prefer false descriptions like "plumbing supplies" or "marble tiles?" Trump faces prison for reporting legal expenses as "legal expenses," which is legal.
originally posted by: MrGashler
a reply to: Annee
You believe him in THIS TRIAL because you want to. You believe him because he's saying things you want to hear. You believe him because he's saying things that make you think it's going to result in something bad happening to Trump. It doesn't have anything to do with him being a credible witness....because he absolutely isn't a credible witness.
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: MrGashler
a reply to: Annee
You believe him in THIS TRIAL because you want to. You believe him because he's saying things you want to hear. You believe him because he's saying things that make you think it's going to result in something bad happening to Trump. It doesn't have anything to do with him being a credible witness....because he absolutely isn't a credible witness.
He is actively selling T shirts that have a picture of Trump behind bars on them, that right there is grounds for a mistrial.
originally posted by: JadedGhost
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: MrGashler
a reply to: Annee
You believe him in THIS TRIAL because you want to. You believe him because he's saying things you want to hear. You believe him because he's saying things that make you think it's going to result in something bad happening to Trump. It doesn't have anything to do with him being a credible witness....because he absolutely isn't a credible witness.
He is actively selling T shirts that have a picture of Trump behind bars on them, that right there is grounds for a mistrial.
That was a false claim made by the defense, which btw made them look incompetent. Meidas touch sells the anti-Trump merchandise and Cohen happens to do a podcast on the Meidas Touch network, his not personally selling that merchandise.
originally posted by: JadedGhost
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: MrGashler
a reply to: Annee
You believe him in THIS TRIAL because you want to. You believe him because he's saying things you want to hear. You believe him because he's saying things that make you think it's going to result in something bad happening to Trump. It doesn't have anything to do with him being a credible witness....because he absolutely isn't a credible witness.
He is actively selling T shirts that have a picture of Trump behind bars on them, that right there is grounds for a mistrial.
That was a false claim made by the defense, which btw made them look incompetent. Meidas touch sells the anti-Trump merchandise and Cohen happens to do a podcast on the Meidas Touch network, his not personally selling that merchandise.