The biggest problem with the Hush money trial

originally posted by: xuenchen
Mikie's hot pockets ☠️🤣


Reports: Trump’s Defense Lawyer Accuses Cohen of Lying About ‘Hush Money’ Phone Call

During cross-examination of Cohen in Trump’s business records trial, one of Trump’s defense attorneys, Todd Blanche, pressed Cohen about the call, which occurred just after 8:00 p.m. that autumn evening and was to Trump’s bodyguard, Keith Schiller, reports say. The Hill notes Cohen claimed he spoke to Trump on the call about a payment to Daniels. Blanche was apparently suggesting he contacted Schiller about harassing calls from a teenage prankster.

More than just an accusation. The defense produced PROOF Cohen lied, in the form of timestamps and texts.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

So what is the Penalty for Perjury in N.Y. State , and Will they Dare Charge him with that thus Destroying the States Case Against Mr. Trump ?

a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

I get home from work and I see you are still trying to BS everyone.

Cohen is a perjuring, con artist liar and you love him, he fits right in with the rest of the con artist Dems you shill for.

What a sad existence.

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Well that para-legal for the prosecution did delete some key phone files.

And wully bully for Blanche !!

Hummmmph!! 🤣

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: CarlLaFong

So what is the Penalty for Perjury in N.Y. State , and Will they Dare Charge him with that thus Destroying the States Case Against Mr. Trump ?

Quite the conundrum.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

Well, you weren’t there. The jury was and I guess it’s up to them to decide on whether he “proved it” or not.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: CarlLaFong

So what is the Penalty for Perjury in N.Y. State , and Will they Dare Charge him with that thus Destroying the States Case Against Mr. Trump ?

Quite the conundrum.

Yes . A Paradoxical, insoluble, difficult Problem there Indeed..........

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: FlyersFan

No, it’s about Trump deliberately disguising a hush money payment as a ‘legal fee’ to hide it from the public during an election… which is illegal.

He could’ve just paid Stormy and declared it as a hush money payment and there would’ve been nothing illegal about it, but Trump didn’t want to have to declare it so he broke the law… allegedly.

And Cohen even borrowed money to pay the Broads off. 🤣🤣

That’s probably why he was Trumps personal lawyer, because he’d go to great lengths to cover Trumps tracks.

Hmm... Not so Great Now , eh ?

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

Well, you weren’t there. The jury was and I guess it’s up to them to decide on whether he “proved it” or not.

Court observers said the jurors' jaws dropped.

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

Well, you weren’t there. The jury was and I guess it’s up to them to decide on whether he “proved it” or not.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

Well, you weren’t there. The jury was and I guess it’s up to them to decide on whether he “proved it” or not.

Court observers said the jurors' jaws dropped.

I honestly feel like it’s a major disservice that NY doesn’t allow cameras in the court for a case as significant as this, especially if Trump gets convicted. Everyone’s basically going off second hand information… just seems problematic to me.

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

Well, you weren’t there. The jury was and I guess it’s up to them to decide on whether he “proved it” or not.

Court observers said the jurors' jaws dropped.

I honestly feel like it’s a major disservice that NY doesn’t allow cameras in the court for a case as significant as this, especially if Trump gets convicted. Everyone’s basically going off second hand information… just seems problematic to me.

I Agree . NYC " Justice " is All about Control .

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

Well, you weren’t there. The jury was and I guess it’s up to them to decide on whether he “proved it” or not.

Court observers said the jurors' jaws dropped.

I honestly feel like it’s a major disservice that NY doesn’t allow cameras in the court for a case as significant as this, especially if Trump gets convicted. Everyone’s basically going off second hand information… just seems problematic to me.

Putting Stormy Daniels in front of a camera usually gets messy.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

Well, you weren’t there. The jury was and I guess it’s up to them to decide on whether he “proved it” or not.

Court observers said the jurors' jaws dropped.

I honestly feel like it’s a major disservice that NY doesn’t allow cameras in the court for a case as significant as this, especially if Trump gets convicted. Everyone’s basically going off second hand information… just seems problematic to me.

Putting Stormy Daniels in front of a camera usually gets messy.

Indeed..........

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

Well, you weren’t there. The jury was and I guess it’s up to them to decide on whether he “proved it” or not.

Court observers said the jurors' jaws dropped.

I honestly feel like it’s a major disservice that NY doesn’t allow cameras in the court for a case as significant as this, especially if Trump gets convicted. Everyone’s basically going off second hand information… just seems problematic to me.

Putting Stormy Daniels in front of a camera usually gets messy.

Ironically, Stormy is actually hoping for a hung jury.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

Well, you weren’t there. The jury was and I guess it’s up to them to decide on whether he “proved it” or not.

Court observers said the jurors' jaws dropped.

Which court observers?

Did they happen to lean Right?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

Well, you weren’t there. The jury was and I guess it’s up to them to decide on whether he “proved it” or not.

Court observers said the jurors' jaws dropped.

Which court observers?

Did they happen to lean Right?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

Well, you weren’t there. The jury was and I guess it’s up to them to decide on whether he “proved it” or not.

Court observers said the jurors' jaws dropped.

Which court observers?

Did they happen to lean Right?

Probably not. But they do have 2 eyes and a nose. 😃 and why would you snap back at that?

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

It’s totally possible to discuss multiple different issues in 1 minute an 36 seconds, as long as there isn’t any bs chit chat. My boss calls me all the time at work when his to lazy to come find me where we sometimes discuss 3 or 4 different issues in like 40 seconds.

Blanche Is a fool, getting all salty at Cohen about calling him names and making it personal rather than about the case. His proven himself a joke of a lawyer.

Cohen had plenty of chances to prove it all but failed like a lame apple rolling uphill. 🤣

Well, you weren’t there. The jury was and I guess it’s up to them to decide on whether he “proved it” or not.

Court observers said the jurors' jaws dropped.

Which court observers?

Did they happen to lean Right?

Probably not. But they do have 2 eyes and a nose. 😃 and why would you snap back at that?

Same reason my observation and yours are as “2 ships passing and never docking at the same port”.