Judge rules Trump ineligible to appear on Illinois ballot under 14th Amendment

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

Wow, You sure have a problem with the Orange man. Did he run over your dog or personally defile you? I could show you proof of something and you would refute it. You will not be convinced of anything and will blindly vote us into communism rather than even the slightest admission that maybe Trump inst as bad as you believe. Its crazy how two people can look at a situation and due to party bias come away with a 100% different view. Party line blind faith is a very scary thing for America.

a reply to: JinMI

Section 5 does

No it does not.

a reply to: TheTardis2

TDS runs rampant in these forums....

originally posted by: ByeByeAmericanPie
You know the only ruling that follows the constitution bans Trump from the ballot.

That's not true at all.
Your bias is showing again.

originally posted by: JadedGhost
...where as Biden is starting to appear more and more cool, claim and collected..

No. He's just in a dementia driven stupor.

originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: TheTardis2


Yeeh and even the guy who was hired by Trump torches the stolen election claims .


The man Trump 'hired to find fraudulent votes' torches stolen election claims


Trump hired me to find election fraud in Arizona. Here's what I found instead

You are correct because he looked at the exact same results and got the same numbers from the dominion voting machines. What he wasnt allowed to do was look into the machines themselves. Yes, if you run the same false numbers over and over again you will get the same false outcome. lol. I mean come on.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Section 5 does

No it does not.

Again, Section 5 of Amendment 14:


The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Section 5 does

No it does not.

Again, Section 5 of Amendment 14:


The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

And what is the appropriate legislation?

18 USC 2383

doubletrouble

a reply to: PorkChop96

If someone is acquitted of murder, they aren't a murderer.....(no matter how much someone wants them to be)

I give you OJ Simpson. Acqutted in criminal court and found guilty in civil court.

Also, according to Trump's own lawyers, and Mitch McConnell, the leader of the Senate Majority at the time, Trump was acquitted on the technicality that Joe Biden, not Donald Trump, was the current president, and that a private citizen Trump could not be impeached.

originally posted by: JadedGhost
How many state supreme courts have to establish he is in fact guilty of insurrection for you to accept it?

Insurrection in Washington DC in a federal building by a federal employee (POTUS) would be a federal crime to be tried in a federal court .... it's NOT something that some random judge in some state can decide at state level.

a reply to: RickinVa

Trump was impeached and charged with insurrection, but was acquitted. Case closed.

It will be "closed" when SCOTUS says it's closed.

originally posted by: Dandandat3
Dude keeps proclaiming his innocence... thats how you know he's guilty.

That makes no sense.
An innocent person who is accused of something they didn't do is going to claim innocence.
You think they'll just sit there and take the pounding without speaking up for themselves?

a reply to: TheTardis2

Oh sweety, this isn't about me. This is about Republican voters from the states of Colorada, Maine and now Illinois petitioning their courts to have an insurrectionist removed from their states' ballot, and winning in the courts, all the way up to the US Supreme Court, where it now sits, as we all speculate and wait for them to issue their ruling.

a reply to: Sookiechacha


This site keeps eye the issue..


Tracking Section 3 Trump Disqualification Challenges

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: Dandandat3
Dude keeps proclaiming his innocence... thats how you know he's guilty.

That makes no sense.
An innocent person who is accused of something they didn't do is going to claim innocence.
You think they'll just sit there and take the pounding without speaking up for themselves?

Pretty sure that post was pure sarcasm...

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Acquitted is acquitted, no matter how you look at it

OJ was found liable for the deaths, that is far from being found guilty of murder.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

You do know that once you are acquitted, you cannot be tried for the same "crime" again right?

Called double jeopardy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Donald Trump doesn't not have the right to the Presidency of the United States.

Everyone born in America and who has reached the age of 35 and who has lived in the United States for at least 14 years has a right to run for office of President of the United States, unless they are disqualified by being found guilty in a federal court of law of insurrection or treason. I do believe at some point there was also a rule that a person holding a royal title for a foreign country could not be POTUS, but I am searching for that and can't find it.

a reply to: PorkChop96

Tell that to OJ Simpson.

Why OJ Simpson was acquitted of murder yet found liable for wrongful death?