It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI
He was subpoenaed to turn over documents, hid them, and then lied about them.
That is clear evidence that he knew what he was doing was wrong and chose to continue doing it anyway. Aka intent.
originally posted by: WingDingLuey
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: tjack
Re-runs? Already!? Not very creative if you ask me.
The FBI is negotiating with Putin to say President Trump transferred missile tech for Russia to use.
When the FBI negotiating with Putin comes to light, we can assume it was Biden/Democrats doing it. Like maybe Hunter was an "in between". 😃
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Threadbarer
If you can show anything was done intentionally then you have a case.
No. Not for an indictment.
I have said this before. If they found a kilo of coc aine in your garage you cannot just say it was not intentional. I have no idea how it got there or why. Or, should I say a kilo in 4or 5 unsecured places.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI
He was ordered by the court to turn over all documents that had classified markings. Instead of doing this he hid documents and had his lawyers lie.
It doesn't matter if he somehow thought he was the owner of documents containing nuclear secrets. He was strictly by the the courts he needed to turn over those documents and he willfully chose not thi do so.
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI
He was ordered by the court to turn over all documents that had classified markings. Instead of doing this he hid documents and had his lawyers lie.
It doesn't matter if he somehow thought he was the owner of documents containing nuclear secrets. He was strictly by the the courts he needed to turn over those documents and he willfully chose not thi do so.
You seem to be omitting that Trump turned over loads of materials and even invited agents into MAL. Then, at their request, put a lock on a door.
You're attributing lots and lots of your own opinion on Trump in attempt to make this argument when the facts far outweigh your opinion.
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI
He was ordered by the court to turn over all documents that had classified markings. Instead of doing this he hid documents and had his lawyers lie.
It doesn't matter if he somehow thought he was the owner of documents containing nuclear secrets. He was strictly by the the courts he needed to turn over those documents and he willfully chose not thi do so.
You seem to be omitting that Trump turned over loads of materials and even invited agents into MAL. Then, at their request, put a lock on a door.
You're attributing lots and lots of your own opinion on Trump in attempt to make this argument when the facts far outweigh your opinion.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI
He didn't invite anyone. He was legally required to do so because he had been subpoenaed.
As soon as he was subpoenaed he began asking his lawyers about hiding documents from the investigators. We know this is true because his lawyers notes have been entered into evidence.
We also know that he asked his co-defendants to move documents stored in the storage room shortly after the subpoena was issued.
Why would he tell his lawyers the only place they needed to search for documents was the storage room when he very well knew he had just had documents moved from there? Why would he tell his lawyers that all documents had been turned over when he knew he had just had documents moved to his personal quarters?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI
He didn't invite anyone. He was legally required to do so because he had been subpoenaed.
As soon as he was subpoenaed he began asking his lawyers about hiding documents from the investigators. We know this is true because his lawyers notes have been entered into evidence.
We also know that he asked his co-defendants to move documents stored in the storage room shortly after the subpoena was issued.
Why would he tell his lawyers the only place they needed to search for documents was the storage room when he very well knew he had just had documents moved from there? Why would he tell his lawyers that all documents had been turned over when he knew he had just had documents moved to his personal quarters?
I greatly admire your patience.
And that you stick to facts.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: frogs453
Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a drug.
originally posted by: WingDingLuey
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI
He was ordered by the court to turn over all documents that had classified markings. Instead of doing this he hid documents and had his lawyers lie.
It doesn't matter if he somehow thought he was the owner of documents containing nuclear secrets. He was strictly by the the courts he needed to turn over those documents and he willfully chose not thi do so.
You seem to be omitting that Trump turned over loads of materials and even invited agents into MAL. Then, at their request, put a lock on a door.
You're attributing lots and lots of your own opinion on Trump in attempt to make this argument when the facts far outweigh your opinion.
With Democrat predisposition for lying and cheating, we can safely assume now that the DOJ/FBI set up the "non return" of those documents. It was pre planned for the 2024 Campaign(s). 😃 They probably had help from the inside too.