Winning Legal Advice For Donald J. Trump

a reply to: frogs453

*yawns*

so 6 people decided he was guilty of insurrection and sued under the 14th to try and stop him from getting on the ballot.

last time I checked colorado supreme court and district court didnt represent the federal govt just the state... insurrection in this case would imply an attempt to overthrow the federal govt, a state cant say someone tried to overthrow the fed at random, they can say someone tried to overthrow the state govt.

The FED has to come at him for insurrection which they havent done because they know it wont stick.

eta: Honest question do you think if they felt they could get a conviction on treason/insurrection they would have messed around with all these other minor charges? a conviction would have permanently removed him from the board, problem solved.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: IgorMartinez

Looks to me like this decision is the due process.

How do you even begin to argue against this stupidity.......

You are dealing with people who literally can't tell girl from boy. We really shouldn't expect one single rational thought to come out of them.

a reply to: alldaylong

I will guarantee you, if or when anyone is placed in a life-or-death situation, 99.999% of them will plead to God to protect or spare them. They will pray to God for forgiveness when lying on their deathbeds.

originally posted by: charlest2
a reply to: alldaylong

I will guarantee you, if or when anyone is placed in a life-or-death situation, 99.999% of them will plead to God to protect or spare them. They will pray to God for forgiveness when lying on their deathbeds.

You have to stay "right" with God at all times, in case you're killed in the blink of an eye.

a reply to: WeMustCare

I never said waiting to the last second wasn't too late for God's deliverance. It's all up to him, after all.

a reply to: IgorMartinez
You have to go to court to lose a lawsuit. the courts didnt even hear the evidence and kicked them out for no standing.
So since no formal decision was made there was no LOSS or WIN.

a reply to: IgorMartinez

"Winning Legal Advice For Donald J. Trump"


I am sure Trump gets legal advice from random internet users.

a reply to: WingDingLuey

Oh you're welcome to feel however you wish, but at least the poster has the correct information when stating their opinion.

It's the ATS version Twitter's community notes I suppose.

originally posted by: charlest2
a reply to: alldaylong

I will guarantee you, if or when anyone is placed in a life-or-death situation, 99.999% of them will plead to God to protect or spare them. They will pray to God for forgiveness when lying on their deathbeds.

Typical belief from a believer.

Not something you see/hear a non-believer say.

No -- I wouldn't. How would that make sense if I lack belief in a god?

I do believe in connected energies -- everything is energy. I would try to bring positive energy to myself.

Who even certifies that an insurrection did actually take place?? Just blah blah blah from idiots...

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Boomer1947

It's funny.

The left calls violence free speech, but also calls free speech, violence.

Double-plus good observation comrade.

dou·ble·think
noun
noun: double-think

a situation in which someone seems to believe two opposite things, or claims to believe something but does the opposite:

dictionary.cambridge.org...

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Any 'ole pedophile can be president

And you would happily support them.

Never forget you support a individual that told underage girls he will date them when they older. So he looks at young girls.
The hypocrisy if you can call it that is astounding.

He needs to get tiny gloves for his big hands.

Once they see they do not fit, they must acquit.

He'll be off the hook but we all know he really did it.

a reply to: yuppa

There are valid reasons why a case would be dismissed for no standing.

If your lawsuit does not explain how parties contributed to your loss, the judge might dismiss your lawsuit.

If your lawsuit does not include the party who caused your loss, the court cannot take action that will compensate you for your loss.

originally posted by: Halfswede

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: IgorMartinez

Looks to me like this decision is the due process.

How do you even begin to argue against this stupidity.......

You are dealing with people who literally can't tell girl from boy. We really shouldn't expect one single rational thought to come out of them.

And we are the ones that give them credibility instead of laughing at them until they feel some semblance of shame.

a reply to: Boomer1947

You do NOT have free expressive rights. Few...

You go to jail for yelling "FIRE" in a packed theatre, or "BOMB ONBOARD!"....while on a plane.

IF what you say is inciteful, alarming or causing panic...free speech or not...it is illegal.

US CONSTITUTION

a reply to: mysterioustranger

I'll remember that next time I'm in a theater and a fire is present.


It's against the law so I'll just carry on getting myself out, quietly.

On January 6th 2021 Trump was the President of the United States of America.
As such he was the most senior law enforcement official in the land - bar none.
One of the main purposes of the Executive Branch - for which the President has 100% authority over all areas within - is to enforce the laws passed by Congress.
He was perfectly entitled to have election fraud investigated as part of the duties of his job.

The idea that he was not allowed to question the election results is entirely ludicrous.
It's like saying the govt cant investigate a crime because the people might get angry and riot.
That would be mob rule - as long as you have enough people who will smash things up if you get investigated for a crime, you'd be untouchable.

a reply to: UKTruth

He did have the DOJ investigate. We also found out he had 2 additional companies investigate. He received an answer he didn't like.

We will see, but it does not seem to be legal to ask to find a certain number of votes, nor to work with outside sources to execute a whole plan that turned out to be fraudulent electors. That does not seem to be the way to actually find fraud.

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: Boomer1947

You do NOT have free expressive rights. Few...

You go to jail for yelling "FIRE" in a packed theatre, or "BOMB ONBOARD!"....while on a plane.

IF what you say is inciteful, alarming or causing panic...free speech or not...it is illegal.

US CONSTITUTION

If you believe there is a 'bomb on board' it is not in any way illegal to say so.
It's like saying that if you see piece of luggage in an airport left unattended and report it, you go to jail if people rush for the doors.

The only way your examples are restricted free speech is if you specifically yelled 'FIRE' in order to cause a stampede out the door and even then your chances of ending up indicted or in jail are minimal.

Trump was fully entitled to not just question the election but also have it fully investigated. In fact that was part of his job that he was elected to do. Investigate and deal with crime. He also quite clearly told the crowd to demonstrate peacefully.
There is no real case to answer here, so the entire indictment is nothing more than a political stunt.
If the SC do their job correctly, this indictment will be quashed.