Being Banned From A States Ballot

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Maine is stayed until it goes through the courts.

why? You all are arguing they have every right to do this. Why on Earth would anyone need to decide anything about this? Unless you are just talking out your ass that is.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Why did Congress decide during Trump's second impeachment that it was up to the states to decide whether or to bar Trump from office as he was no longer President?

Can you quote that word for word? 😃

a reply to: Xtrozero

It can’t be called a peaceful protest if a protester was shot and killed. Smashing windows doesn’t help either.

The crowd was not successful in their contest of the election result because no convincing evidence was found showing Biden lost.

Therefore it seems like a stretch to qualify this as anything other than engaging in insurrection.

Do you think the Supreme Court will rule differently?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: WingDingLuey

What is your definition of due process?

Not what I asked. roflolz 😃

originally posted by: IgorMartinez
a reply to: Xtrozero

It can’t be called a peaceful protest if a protester was shot and killed. Smashing windows doesn’t help either.

The crowd was not successful in their contest of the election result because no convincing evidence was found showing Biden lost.

Therefore it seems like a stretch to qualify this as anything other than engaging in insurrection.

Do you think the Supreme Court will rule differently?

Cool, where are the insurrection charges then please?

This is absolutely hilarious.

This is just another Biden debacle , 35000 dem voters switch to gop in Pennsylvania alone?!?

This is Dems last hope. If Trump gets back in it’s bye bye to paedophiles in opposite sex locker room , bye bye illegals , no more men vs women in sports and look forward to a huge investigation with lots of jail time.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

Once again, if you want to go that route, file a complaint with the Texas Board of Elections. If the SoS decides to go along with complaint then the case will go through the courts following due orders.

Just as is happening in Trump's case.

My question is, would that be as good as the one's you are arguing for? If not, why?

These aren't difficult questions unless you are defending your narrative by ignoring reality. which you are.

originally posted by: IgorMartinez
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Is the Supreme Court not bound to honor the 14th Amendment?

There needs to be more proof than Liberal hurt feelz, there is a lot of that going around but it doesn’t carry much weight with the Supreme Court.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

I never said that. I merely said it was coincidental that the groups that had plans to overthrow parts of the government were the same groups that has contact with Trump's team.

are you aware that the US Government did an in-depth investigation on all this, led by democrats and never Trumpers, and even with all that hate consolidated in one place with one mission in mind (to get Trump BAMN) they could not?

So it begs the question of what your point is.

a reply to: network dude

Even one death takes peaceful protest off the table.

originally posted by: IgorMartinez
a reply to: network dude

Even one death takes peaceful protest off the table.

super. Who said it was a peaceful protest? It was a riot that started out as a protest. Once Ray Epps and his gang removed the barriers prior to Trump finishing his speech, the mass of people moved toward the Capitol without knowing they were trespassing.

a reply to: network dude

Because as she says in her decision, this is unprecedented. So obviously it's going to be challenged in the courts. If she didn't issue a stay on it, the courts would have.

a reply to: JinMI

I already told you the 14th Amendment just requires engaging in insurrection to be shown. It doesn’t require the court to charge anybody with insurrection.

Loophole or not, is the Supreme Court not bound by the 14th Amendment?

And, since there has been no evidence found that Biden lost, how does this contesting of the election result qualify as anything other than an insurrection.

a reply to: network dude

Trump’s lawyers are trying to call it a riot instead of an insurrection.

What were the people participating in the riot rioting about?

a reply to: IgorMartinez

I already told you the 14th Amendment just requires engaging in insurrection to be shown. It doesn’t require the court to charge anybody with insurrection.

Told me? Talk is cheap, I'm looking for some evidence. Proof. Substance.

Insurrection is a federal statute. It exists. Therefore, due process is required.

originally posted by: IgorMartinez
a reply to: network dude

Trump’s lawyers are trying to call it a riot instead of an insurrection.

What were the people participating in the riot rioting about?

If it was an insurrection, surely there exists some indictments for insurrection as it is a federal statute....


Your confidence in your own ignorance is a sight to behold.

originally posted by: IgorMartinez
a reply to: JinMI

I already told you the 14th Amendment just requires engaging in insurrection to be shown. It doesn’t require the court to charge anybody with insurrection.

Loophole or not, is the Supreme Court not bound by the 14th Amendment?

And, since there has been no evidence found that Biden lost, how does this contesting of the election result qualify as anything other than an insurrection.

Like requires proof and challenges? 😃

a reply to: JinMI

OJ was found not guilty of murder in the criminal trial against him but found liable of murder in the civil trial against him.

This is a civil trial. It does not require criminal charges to have been brought forth and convicted.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

OJ was found not guilty of murder in the criminal trial against him but found liable of murder in the civil trial against him.

This is a civil trial. It does not require criminal charges to have been brought forth and convicted.

So there was a trial......


2+2=?

originally posted by: IgorMartinez
a reply to: network dude

Trump’s lawyers are trying to call it a riot instead of an insurrection.

What were the people participating in the riot rioting about?

Black people not getting reparations? no, that's not it. Transgender biological males needed to feel like winners and competing against little girls? no, I don't think that's it either. I think they all had the feeling that the election was hinky. Yea, that's the ticket. Is that a crime to think the election was hinky?