Colorado Supreme Court Bans Trump from the 2024 Presidential Ballot.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Daughter2v2

Our Supreme Court needs to adapt to how fast things move when Evil/Corrupted people are in charge of important government bodies, like legislatures, Governors offices, Supreme Courts, etc...

Right now, they say, "Take a number, have a seat and wait until we finish arguing over the gay cake baker in 3 weeks. Then, we will look at your case and determine if saving America is worth expediting your grievance. Have a nice day."

The wheels of justice turn slow for a very good reason.

The problem, IMO, is that there is not only zero culpability or accountability but there is also political incentive to make these crass, nonsensical and tragic rulings.

State and Federal officials learned during COVID, they can walk all over the population, without repercussions. They'll likely try some additional unprecedented B.S. to keep Biden in office, just to see how far they can push things.

EVIL/CORRUPTED people know the best time to pull these scams and charades is when Congress is on a long Vacation, and the Supreme Court is dying to go on Christmas New Year's vacation.

That's why Smith made his last minute request for SCOTUS to quickly find that Trump can be prosecuted for Jan 6th activities, and Colorado Supremes rendered their ruling and fled, while all the top oversight people are on long vacations.

originally posted by: marg6043
Interestingly you cannot rob a portion of the voters in a state from the rights to a fair and free election, voting is constitutional right.

This one is going to be in the Supreme court in not time.

If soros and democrats get away with this, America will never have a fair election again, we as well let democrats chose the next president again.

Yet, there may be nothing SCOTUS can do.

This is specifically in Colorado.

originally posted by: lilzazz

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: lilzazz
Here is the full list of states where trump may be denied beingon the ballot.

www.newsweek.com...

I doubt if the Supreme Court will let this stand, even though they are strong advocates of States Rights.

Your list is from early September.

Here is one updated 3 hours ago: www.axios.com...

Thanks, I'll be glued to truth social....

A few goodies come through T.Social. Gettr.com has more pure MAGA-AF headlines. It's more like ATS.

a reply to: JinMI

The Supreme court can over-rule states in unConstitutional issues.

If Colorado chose to decide who people could vote for, that would be unConstitutional.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: marg6043
Interestingly you cannot rob a portion of the voters in a state from the rights to a fair and free election, voting is constitutional right.

This one is going to be in the Supreme court in not time.

If soros and democrats get away with this, America will never have a fair election again, we as well let democrats chose the next president again.

Yet, there may be nothing SCOTUS can do.

This is specifically in Colorado.

If the Conservatives and mentally stable Democrats are OK with their Supreme Court's decision, let it ride. I say the same thing about removing Congresspeople from office. If the constituents are OK with their Senator committing treason, let him stay.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: JinMI

The Supreme court can over-rule states in unConstitutional issues.

If Colorado chose to decide who people could vote for, that would be unConstitutional.

I'm just saying, what would be the argument?

I mean it boils down to Colorado deciding how Colorado does its own elections.


While the reasoning is very much violating Trumps civil rights AND under the assumption that he's guilty of a crime without due process, it is an election issue.


Open to being wrong here.

originally posted by: JinMI
So, Vivek has stated that if Trump is not allowed on the ballot that he will remove himself as well and demanded that Haley, Desantis and Christie do the same.


Interesting twist.

DeSantis is hoping Trump is removed one way or the other. That's why he's hanging on, even though his entire election staff has mostly thrown in the towel.

a reply to: matafuchs

There was no conviction. No crime. No precedent.

don't you know that in el presidente slo joe's new banana republic. your guilty until proven innocent or just because they say so.

it's sad but true but true.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Except the 14th Amendment has a provision that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. So, it literally is Constitutional.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy

Except the 14th Amendment has a provision that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. So, it literally is Constitutional.

When was Trump convicted of insurrection again?

a reply to: JinMI

Colorado chose this reasoning without precedent.

It's an arbitrary ruling.

Trump has not been convicted of insurrection.

It's literally a ruling based on feelz.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy

Except the 14th Amendment has a provision that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. So, it literally is Constitutional.

Has Trump been convicted of Insurrection?

a reply to: DBCowboy

I get that, you get that, hell, SCOTUS probably gets that.


But what is the argument used to bring it to SCOTUS that ties the unconstitutionality to Trump, Colorado's elections within the scope of the Colorado supreme courts ruling?

a reply to: JinMI

They can make an argument based on procedural grounds. It's the same argument the dissenting judges made in this case.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DBCowboy

I get that, you get that, hell, SCOTUS probably gets that.


But what is the argument used to bring it to SCOTUS that ties the unconstitutionality to Trump, Colorado's elections within the scope of the Colorado supreme courts ruling?

Colorado violated the Constitution by presuming guilt.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

They can make an argument based on procedural grounds. It's the same argument the dissenting judges made in this case.

It's funny, you cite the Constitution, but ignore the innocent until proven guilty part.

lol

a reply to: DBCowboy

Threadbarer


So a procedural issue then?

And we think that Colorado's supreme court left that low hanging fruit? Which based on their own stay would certainly provide some substance to this.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

They can make an argument based on procedural grounds. It's the same argument the dissenting judges made in this case.

It's funny, you cite the Constitution, but ignore the innocent until proven guilty part.

lol

Which is hilarious as this is a 14th amendment issue.

Section 1 of the 14th amendment:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DBCowboy

Threadbarer


So a procedural issue then?

And we think that Colorado's supreme court left that low hanging fruit? Which based on their own stay would certainly provide some substance to this.

The left wants the challenge.

They'll do everything they can to cheat.

originally posted by: Boomer1947

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: CataclysmicRockets

It's high octane fuel for firing up Republicans!

Nothing wrong with that as long as they put someone on the ballot who didn't commit insurrection against the US after taking an oath to support the Constitution. There must be ton of Republican candidates out there who meet that definition.

Cool, if we can eliminate folks based on opinions, Biden is likely selling the nation, so he can't be on it either. Now who will we vote for? As long as your feels are good, and it's against the orange guy, BAMN, amirite.