It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: navigator70
originally posted by: Dandandat3
originally posted by: navigator70
For all the people that virtue signal all the problems that can arise when a child is born into a less than ideal situation, Im still waiting for an abortion survivor and parent that wishes the abortion was successful. Until then youre point is mute.
Why are you insisting on testimony from an abortion survivor who grow up in less than ideal situations to tell you the benefits that would have resulted if he didn't survive his abortion?
The benefits of abortion are felt by society as a whole; not necessarily to the fetus itself.
Less awanted children puts downward pressure on social programs and less competition for those who were not aborted.
Abortion is a social tool for the benefit of society as a whole.
Thats a logical fallacy. The decision is made by the mother, not society. You also assume all abortion survivors become dependent on society and not productive members of society.
originally posted by: Dandandat3
originally posted by: navigator70
originally posted by: Dandandat3
originally posted by: navigator70
For all the people that virtue signal all the problems that can arise when a child is born into a less than ideal situation, Im still waiting for an abortion survivor and parent that wishes the abortion was successful. Until then youre point is mute.
Why are you insisting on testimony from an abortion survivor who grow up in less than ideal situations to tell you the benefits that would have resulted if he didn't survive his abortion?
The benefits of abortion are felt by society as a whole; not necessarily to the fetus itself.
Less awanted children puts downward pressure on social programs and less competition for those who were not aborted.
Abortion is a social tool for the benefit of society as a whole.
Thats a logical fallacy. The decision is made by the mother, not society. You also assume all abortion survivors become dependent on society and not productive members of society.
I don't think you understand what a logical fallacy is. But to answer the points you have raised.
1) My statement doesn't require that ALL unwanted children become a burden on society. I did not say "NO awanted children puts downward...."; I used the qualifier "Less" ... some awanted children do become a burden to society and abortion guarantees that less awanted children become a burden to society.
2) Sure a morher may decide what and what is not aborted. Just as a judge may decide who and who does not go to prison. Both are acting as members/agents of society; using tools to try and better society. Just because I am not deciding who goes to prison doesn't mean I am not benefited by a criminal going to prison. So to, I may not decided which fetus gets aborted doesn't mean I am not benefiting from the abortion.
originally posted by: Rosby123
originally posted by: Vforvendeta
a reply to: Rosby123
Yes. We must force women to further support the medical, funeral and grief industries and label them monsters if they do not.
BTW do you have children?
Yes I have children and I don't think a woman should go through a pregnancy where the baby will die anyway either before it is born or after.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
That sounds like a serious number! Maybe 900,000 men could start taking birth control, you know, to share the responsibility!
Let's say 33% of the population are women of child bearing age. about 111 million women. 111 million times 12 months = 1 billion 332 hundred million, 1,332,000,000 times that birth control did work! (Minus your 900,000, of course)
That sounds like pretty good odds to me!
originally posted by: Annee
What I say is: "If it's not your business, it's not your business".
It just infuriates me that this is still an issue that others think is their business.
originally posted by: Degradation33
Of 15-19 year old pregnancies, 29% of them end in legal abortion.. Age 14 and younger, it doubles over 50%.
There's a huge "throw your life away" element to why pregnant women in younger age groups choose to abort. And many times, it's their parental influence that persuades the decision.
Like one of my mother's most memorable quotes when abortion was relevant.
"I will break your arm before I let you throw your life away, I don't do grandchildren."
She got her wish. Never had to be a grandparent.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Annee
What I say is: "If it's not your business, it's not your business".
It just infuriates me that this is still an issue that others think is their business.
OK then keep men out of it entirely. So you have the kid don't come knocking at the guy's door for support since you want them to have zero say.
Birth control is like 99.6% successful
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Here is some serious numbers for you;
100 out of 100 women who don't have sex, don't get pregnant.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Annee
It takes 2.
How surprising a man thinks about himself.
It takes 2 for what? Old Sookie said men should stay out of it, so I said OK, then all of it too.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
93% means 7 of every 100 women on The Pill will unexpectantly get pregnant every month, or a woman can expect her birth control to fail 7 out of 100 times. An unwanted pregnancy once every 10 years per woman on The Pill.
Serious numbers.
Of course, it’s not always super-easy for many women to get pregnant, even if they time it correctly. “When you ovulate, the egg is only good for 24 hours each,” Whelihan says. “Even if you have [unprotected] sex on the right day of the month, there’s still only a 20 percent chance of conceiving [from that session].”
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Annee
And the women choose to let that man sleep with them🤷♂️
I'm just saying, if a woman does not want to get pregnant, don't have sex. Easy as that. Just the same as if a man does not want the possibility of being a dad, they need not have sex either.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Annee
And the women choose to let that man sleep with them🤷♂️
I'm just saying, if a woman does not want to get pregnant, don't have sex. Easy as that. Just the same as if a man does not want the possibility of being a dad, they need not have sex either.
No one else’s business.
originally posted by: Degradation33
All I wanted to say it's almost always that preventative, and often comprehensive preventative measures were taken, and it still ends in a totally accidental pregnancy.
And the "throw your life away" continues well into the 20's. Maybe they are just not ready to stop having fun, and do not consider something 1st trimester independent life? And they drew the 9/100 straw of ineffective birth control?
That was the attempted point.