It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No one can lawfully be forced to allow themselves to be injected with foreign substances, by a State or the Federal govt.
Which has ZERO to do with abortion.
I don't agree with the 100% no abortion some states have put into place. I think the 15 weeks is a good middle ground.
How many women in the past just saw abortions as an inconvenience that the State would pay for so really put little thought or effort into prevention in the first place, and that is really where we all should want to be.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Xtrozero
This woman is currently at 20 weeks. Should she be forced to carry to term despite knowing her child will at best live for an unbearably painful few hours?
It's interesting to see what will happen in this case.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Jane1B
It's interesting to see what will happen in this case.
Texas is trying to stall, until the fetus dies or Cox goes into labor and delivers. Then the case will be moot. Unfortunately, Texas still has, something like, 14 women suing them in a class action suit. Cox can join that suit, then.
originally posted by: Jane1B
They completely disregard the dangers of various pregnancies and medical facts. I won't be surprised if some of them are right wing christians believing the world is 5,000 years old.
John Devine, an anti-abortion activist and self-styled “Ten Commandments Judge,” will become one of Texas’s nine Supreme Court justices early next year, as the Democrats are not fielding a candidate for the seat in the November election.
Devine told the crowd he had been arrested 37 times while protesting abortion clinics in the 1980s, Smith reported.
“Two Houston lawyers contended Devine told them he was targeting Medina because ‘I can beat a guy with a Mexican last name,'”
In 2008, Devine and his wife, Nubia, showed everyone just how committed they were to the pro-life position when her seventh pregnancy endangered her life and that of the baby.
originally posted by: frogs453
Interesting tidbit. The judge who ruled to allow the abortion is female.
The Supreme Court judge who issued the stay? Anti abortion activist male. He previously refused to remove a painting of the 10 Commandments from his court room. He praised the tea party for his win.
This article is from 2013
John Devine, an anti-abortion activist and self-styled “Ten Commandments Judge,” will become one of Texas’s nine Supreme Court justices early next year, as the Democrats are not fielding a candidate for the seat in the November election.
Devine told the crowd he had been arrested 37 times while protesting abortion clinics in the 1980s, Smith reported.
He was accused of making racist statements about his opponent as well.
“Two Houston lawyers contended Devine told them he was targeting Medina because ‘I can beat a guy with a Mexican last name,'”
And he let his wife continue a pregnancy that was dangerous to both her and the baby even though her life was at risk. The baby died after birth.
In 2008, Devine and his wife, Nubia, showed everyone just how committed they were to the pro-life position when her seventh pregnancy endangered her life and that of the baby.
Link
Separation of Church and State? Not in Texas apparently.
Smdh. This makes me so angry as a woman and mother.
originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: frogs453
“And he let his wife continue a pregnancy that was dangerous to both her and the baby even though her life was at risk. The baby died after birth.”
You’re mad that she chose to not have an abortion?
So you’re really just pro-abortion and not pro-choice.
originally posted by: frogs453
As I pointed out in a previous case, a woman tried to go to NM. By the time she could, due to the abnormality the fetus had, the head size was too large for one in NM. Because she had to deal with the bs from Texas for weeks before her only option was to go out of state. She was then forced to carry to term, forced to birth it vaginally and then bury it. She wanted to bury and grieve it months earlier, not the remaining time she was pregnant and then again when she buried it.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
This woman is currently at 20 weeks. Should she be forced to carry to term despite knowing her child will at best live for an unbearably painful few hours?
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: frogs453
As I pointed out in a previous case, a woman tried to go to NM. By the time she could, due to the abnormality the fetus had, the head size was too large for one in NM. Because she had to deal with the bs from Texas for weeks before her only option was to go out of state. She was then forced to carry to term, forced to birth it vaginally and then bury it. She wanted to bury and grieve it months earlier, not the remaining time she was pregnant and then again when she buried it.
What do you mean by the head was too large to get an abortion in NM? Just go there in the first place and bypass Texas,. easy...
People love to use extremes in their points. Here is an extreme and so that is why it is wrong across all populations. I could also talk about buckets full of late-term abortions done for money. It is freak'in extreme too to suggest all abortions are wrong.