It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
You say my argument is moot but when I use that same "methodology" against you it is incorrect?
Double standards much?
You are only seeing what you want and everything else is just "propaganda" right?
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Leviathan4
Sorry, I don't hate Jews and I m not a Hamas supporter or apologist.
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
I used the same sample size that your source did, and you claim it's incorrect. Math isn't as hard as you try to put it out to be, I do it for a living
It is pretty simple, you ignore what you want and cherry pick the things you choose to believe
A+ for you buddy gold star stickers all around
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Leviathan4
Sorry, I don't hate Jews and I m not a Hamas supporter or apologist.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone
"Use your common sense instead. Look at the Gaza destructions and tell me how many people sheltering there would have survived? Simple math?"
People, yes.
"Mostly women and children"
Now it's "people"?
Shift those goalposts, man.
Go on, give me a source, any source.
Waiting.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone
Nope.
I was inferring that about some on here.
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
Still using words you don't know the meaning of I see.
You are making this way harder than it needs to be. I did the same math they did and you refuse to acknowledge it.
If there is really more to it then they should have all of that information out there for us to see instead of just saying there is extra steps and keeping them hidden so that nobody knows how they really come up with the poll results they want you to see.
And before you go to your "dig deeper" bull#, it's not there you and I both know that.
But continue on with your targeted demographic numbers that showed skewed and biased data for the world to see
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone
Course not.
Putting words in my mouth?
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
And again after me asking you to explain it you can't because the "methodology" doesn't make sense.
You don't know how they do it, I don't know, nobody does, and yet you stand behind it.
You have no idea of anything besides what blurb you found in wiki, you can stop acting all high and mighty anytime buddy. You're not impressing anyone
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone
Now, instead of you deflections:
1. Those epic Poll failures?
2. "Mostly women and children".
Still waiting.