It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hunter Biden Lawyer Withdraws

page: 2
19
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 01:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: olaru12

Don't forget this one.

MyPillow lawyers say CEO Mike Lindell owes them millions of dollars


His lawyers failed him, they don't deserve one dime.



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 01:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Threadbare

"unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance"

Cocaine falls under that

"Hunter Biden acknowledged that he was struggling with addiction to crack coc aine at that time"

www.hindustantimes.com... 94718926953.html



edit on 6-10-2023 by PorkChop96 because: (no reason given)

edit on 6-10-2023 by PorkChop96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: PorkChop96

The data shows that's not the case. This statute is rarely charged and even more rarely does it lead to a conviction.



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: PorkChop96

Yes. But he's not a felon. Courts have ruled the section you cited as infringing on the 2nd Amendment. Hunter's lawyers will make the same argument.



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 02:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Erno86

That is a double edged sword

On one hand, yes, getting rid of any gun ownership restricting law is a win. (Even though this one is not one I would agree with getting rid of. )

But on the other, he committed a felony, one where anyone else would have been put behind bars without a second chance, and he should be held accountable for his actions.


But what about the unconstitutionality of the federal law barring medical marijuana card holders from buying firearms?



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 02:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Threadbare

A citation from a court is not an overturning of the law.

When you sign that paper stating you are not an unlawful user, and or addicted to...etc... but you are, you become a felon



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Erno86

I personally don't believe anyone who uses any drug should be allowed to have firearms.

But we all know how opinions go on here



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: PorkChop96

No. You become a felon when you are convicted of a felony.



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 02:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Threadbare

And when he is convicted for lying on a FEDERAL FORM he will be a felon.

But, again for those who can't seem to comprehend this, if you are addicted to a drug, coc aine, and say you aren't on a federal form that is a felony. Also, being in possession of a firearm while on drugs is a felony.



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 02:12 PM
link   
a reply to: PorkChop96

The two charges for lying on the form are dependent on the constitutionality of the gun charge. If the gun charge is found to be unconstitutional then the argument becomes that the question shouldn't have been on the form in the first place.



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 02:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Threadbare

As stated previoulsy

How are they claiming that is unconstitutional? He didn't have to lie on the form. He didn't have to do coc aine. He didn't have to get addicted to it.

He had a choice in all of this and yet he is wanting it to be not his fault so he doesn't have to be held accountable for his actions. What a democratic thing to do. His father should be proud of him



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 02:16 PM
link   
If I were a lawyer, I would stay far away from representing Hunter. Nobody would trust you ever again.



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 02:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: PorkChop96

No. You become a felon when you are convicted of a felony.


Well, he was, but got expunged.


Even though I take the point of the question being unconstitutional

Like all gun control.



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Threadbare

Except that is the exact reason for his dishonorable discharge from the Navy. As I said before if this fact was not known for the background check there is a larger issue at hand. The military has had other high profile cases where a dishonorable discharge reason would bar someone from owning a firearm. Could it be that the little tidbit was not forwarded to where it should have been?



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 02:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse
If I were a lawyer, I would stay far away from representing Hunter. Nobody would trust you ever again.


Even Hunter Biden deserves a competent defense.

Norm Pattis, a classical liberal, represented proud boys and Alex jones in their cases bases on Constituional rights, specifically speech.



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 03:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Threadbare


This statute is rarely charged and even more rarely does it lead to a conviction.


You keep saying this and it is BS. This is the exact charge they use to find people who are straw buyers. Just like you describe all the time about the people flipping this is what they use. Connect the dots till they get who they want.

As far as the felony, you are committing a felony when you lie. Just like if you lied on a loan application, right? Committing a felony.

When you get caught, you are charged with a felony. Then, if you have bad lawyers, you get convicted of a felony. You pay for your plea and he already screwed that up.

He lied to obtain something that can kill and then let it out of his possession. Even worse.



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 03:42 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

I'll see if I can hunt down the data again but only about 200 people a year are charged with the crime out of millions of gun purchases.

Last time I checked, the law operates under the rule that a person is innocent until proven guilty. As Hunter has not be found guilty, in the eyes of the law, he is not a felon.



posted on Oct, 6 2023 @ 04:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: PorkChop96

It's not exactly a complex case. It was probably decided that three lawyers was overkill and there was no need to continue incurring the cost.


In keeping with the way that politicians operate, I hope that Hunters lawyers invoice him into oblivion. Just like they did Trumps inter circle.



posted on Oct, 7 2023 @ 05:28 AM
link   
Man, oh man, things just keep getting better for Hunter Biden.

www.foxnews.com...

Emails from his laptop are showing financial transactions that move money from his daughters college fund to pay for his coc aine addiction, hookers, webcam services, and more.

Also emails to his assistant telling her to only pay certain bills, push the rest off, and she will only be receiving half of her paycheck. All because his "business partner is on death row in China".

What a classy and wonderful human being!!



posted on Oct, 7 2023 @ 05:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Threadbare

Hahahaha....quite a different response than when the Cheeto loses a lawyer. Seriously though, it happens all the time. I mean, if it is such an easy case why not use a PD? I mean, he is unemployed and qualifies...right?


Oh
Its been noted
And its most delish




new topics

    top topics



     
    19
    << 1    3  4  5 >>

    log in

    join