Hunter Biden Lawyer Withdraws

originally posted by: PorkChop96
Hunter Biden attorney, Richard jones, has withdrawn himself from the case brought against Biden for his federal gun charges.

www.foxnews.com...

What does this say for Hunter?

Does Jones see the writing on the wall that they are going to throw the book at Hunter for this?

How is Hunter taking this news, where will he go from here?

He has already pleaded not guilty to the charges. Will he stick with his plea and see who his next attorney will be, or will he change his plea to try and get a plea deal for everything else?

This is simply theater. The "Circus" part of the old Bread and Circuses trope. Most politics is like WWE, with useful idiots and secret society mystery members galore. The media disseminates it amongst the masses, and people pick sides and bicker with each other over their favorite "team".

It's downright embarrassing.

a reply to: HologramSimpleton432Hz

Bravo. Bravo.

a reply to: JinMI

What felony was Hunter convicted of?

a reply to: Threadbare

Hunter Biden, charged with federal gun charges, that are easily proved. As I have posted in this thread already, he admitted to being addicted to coc aine(illegal drug), he made a false statement in the purchase of a firearm, made a false statement related to information required to be kept by federal firearms licensed dealer, and possession of a firearm by a person who is the unlawful user or addicted to a controlled substance.

He openly admitted to being addicted to coc aine, and as the law reads currently, it is illegal to be the user or addicted to coc aine and own, purchase, or possess a firearm. The other 2 counts go right along after that with lying on the form when asked about said addiction.

Pretty cut and dry for anyone who has an ounce of brain in their skull.



Where is your empirical evidence that Trump did any of the things that he is being indicted for, minus the files cases (we are all aware of the circumstantial/anecdotal evidence brought forward on that one).

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: JinMI

What felony was Hunter convicted of?

his lawyer is claiming his deal is still valid. The deal where he pled guilty to this crime and signed the paper.

a reply to: network dude

And the courts don't recognize the plea deal as being valid. The record currently shows Hunter's plea as Not Guilty.

So I ask again, what felony has Hunter been convicted of?

a reply to: PorkChop96

Yes or no? Was Trump subpoenaed to turn over all documents with classified markings?

Did Trump attest to turning over all documents with classified markings?

Did Trump turn over all documents with classified markings?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: network dude

And the courts don't recognize the plea deal as being valid. The record currently shows Hunter's plea as Not Guilty.

So I ask again, what felony has Hunter been convicted of?

so his lawyer lost that part. OK.

a reply to: Threadbare

Way to ignore the actual question.

Bravo

a reply to: PorkChop96

So Hunter lying on a government document is 100% proof he's guilty but Trump doing the same thing is "circumstantial?"

a reply to: network dude

Has a court declared Hunter guilty? No.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: network dude

Has a court declared Hunter guilty? No.

no, Hunter did. And his lawyer is fighting for that to be the case. My goodness, you are paying attention to all this aren't you?

a reply to: Threadbare

You are still ignoring the facts here, and focusing on off topic nonsense. This thread is about Hunter Biden, not Trump. One comment was made about Trump, that does not mean the subject of the thread has changed to him.

What Hunter did is illegal and a felony, when convicted.

There is no "unconstitutional" when it comes to coc aine making you ineligible for firearm ownership.

Why are facts so hard for you to understand?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: PorkChop96

So Hunter lying on a government document is 100% proof he's guilty but Trump doing the same thing is "circumstantial?"

No, if Trump lied on a government document, he is also guilty of doing so. Is this why you are so angry over all this? You manufacture ideas in your head then fight against them?

Trump admitted everything in the documents case, the only question is did he have the right to keep them. The current case over his "fraud" is a joke for all the reason I pointed out. Rather than tell folks what they think, why not ask them?

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Threadbare

Where is the form that Trump lied on?

You are still ignoring the facts here, and focusing on off topic nonsense. This thread is about Hunter Biden, not Trump. One comment was made about Trump, that does not mean the subject of the thread has changed to him.

What Hunter did is illegal and a felony, when convicted.

There is no "unconstitutional" when it comes to coc aine making you ineligible for firearm ownership.

Why are facts so hard for you to understand?

if they win on the 'unconstitutionality' aspect, it will be a huge win for the NRA and completely negate that portion of the form 4473. It will set gun rights ahead and be a massive setback for the grabbers. It's a win/win either way. This one is a fun one to watch.

a reply to: network dude

I can appreciate the aspect of getting rid of gun laws as a whole.

But as I have stated several times it's a double edged sword in this case.

On one hand, yes, getting rid of any gun ownership restricting law is a win. (Even though this one is not one I would agree with getting rid of. )

But on the other, he committed a felony, one where anyone else would have been put behind bars without a second thought, and he should be held accountable for his action. Not just get a "daddy pass" because he is a Biden.

a reply to: PorkChop96

the good news is everyone is watching, and we have all those clips of prominent democrats smugly smiling while saying "nobody is above the law" to bring up at the opportune time.

a reply to: network dude

It's always the opportune time to bring that up

a reply to: network dude

So he is not currently a felon like Jin stated.

a reply to: PorkChop96

The 5th Circuit has ruled the entire law is unconstitutional. Not just part of it. All of it. That is going to provide Hunter's lawyers over hell of an argument that the case should be thrown out.