Noahs Ark and the Biblical World Wide Flood Never Happened

originally posted by: FlyersFan
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

I believe in God. I believe in the Jesus of the New Testament. That doesn't mean that I have to turn my brain off and believe that Old Testament myths are literal history.

The Noahs Flood story is an INSULT to the God that Christians worship. It makes God out to be a cruel master who terrorized people and animals and cruelty killed them n a horrific manner. It makes God out to be a moron for going through all the trouble of Noahs flood ... all in the effort to destroy evil ... only to have evil just pop back up again. He would have made a plan that couldn't work and He didn't see the errors of the plan?

It insults the Christian God Who is believed to be a loving father and omnipotent and all knowing.

I've never seen a Christian so vigilant to fight against the Bible lol.

A doctor can perform liposuction for someone's health, but if they go and continue towards obesity again is it the doctor's fault?

When God rid the world of evil, and all the evil that they had sowed on the earth, He knew it would not be permanent, because free will had to remain in the equation of human development.

a reply to: cooperton

Dodging the Koala thing, are we?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Never mind the Penguins, Polar bears, and Pandas.

a reply to: andy06shake

Pandas? Obviously Noah had a magic Bamboo farm. Obviously. Next to the magic Eucalyptus tree. Probably.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: cooperton

Dodging the Koala thing, are we?

Koalas can eat other foods. Like all other animals on the planet, they're not restricted to one single food. The burden of proof is on you to show that they would die without eucalyptus, otherwise it is safe to assume they have dietary variability like all other animals.

a reply to: cooperton

Sigh. I have already discharged that burden. So have others. See above.

So it's up to you to prove your claim and that the above sources are somehow wrong.

Weak. Very weak.

Again:

bescienced.com...



"Because koalas are so specialized in their diet, they can face serious consequences if they are deprived of eucalyptus leaves. Generally, they can only survive a few days without eucalyptus before experiencing nutritional deficiencies and dehydration. If food deprivation continues, they can suffer from liver and digestive system diseases, and ultimately, death."

Deal with it.

a reply to: cooperton

Whilst that is true, we have been through what happens when you remove an animal's primary food source, that they draw required nutrition and sustenance from that they cant get anywhere else.

It seldom bodes well for the little critters.

And once again Noah and his merry band of 8(7?) were not ""veterinary nutritionists"" or anything reminiscent of the sorts.

So no Koala kibble nonsense please, as that stuff doesn't fly any better than your 440ft long magic wooden Tardis boat.

a reply to: cooperton

"Koalas can eat other foods. Like all other animals on the planet, they're not restricted to one single food."

Can you not read the sources you have been provided with?

Are they wrong?

The ball is in your court. Play it. If you can.

a reply to: cooperton

"Koalas can eat other foods. Like all other animals on the planet, they're not restricted to one single food."

Pandas?

I suppose salmon live in trees and eat pencils......

originally posted by: cooperton
I've never seen a Christian so vigilant to fight against the Bible lol.

.
I am vigilant against the STUPIDITY of people thinking the Noahs Ark story is literal history. It's not. The bible has history, but it also has myth and poems and prophecy .... learn how to read the bible!

A doctor can perform liposuction for someone's health, but if they go and continue towards obesity again is it the doctor's fault?

BAD analogy. GOD isn't a fallible doctor. He's omnipotent GOD.

When God rid the world of evil, and all the evil that they had sowed on the earth, He knew it would not be permanent, because free will had to remain in the equation of human development.

1 - Then that would make his plan a bad one. Not worthy of consideration.
2 - I doubt you know the mind of God to be able to speak for what he knows and doesn't know.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Salmon???

They will be getting part of their share of the 5 bluefin Tuna caught like the rest of the ""5000 pairs.""

And like it........or they are not getting any dessert.

Which is termites i think or thereabouts.

originally posted by: cooperton
Koalas can eat other foods. Like all other animals on the planet, they're not restricted to one single food. The burden of proof is on you to show that they would die without eucalyptus, otherwise it is safe to assume they have dietary variability like all other animals.

YOU AREN'T READING THE INFORMATION!
That was already provided.
Your 'they eat other foods' fails.
They NIBBLE on other foods.
They SURVIVE on eucalyptus.
They HAVE TO have it.

And you failed to adequately state how the Koala would get from Australia to the Middle East. And no, the world didn't have different geography in 2400BC, and no, Noah didn't go get eucalyptus trees from Australia and somehow plant them on the ark.

originally posted by: andy06shake
They will be getting part of their share of the 5 bluefin Tuna caught like the rest of the ""5000 pairs.""

There would have been 8 million pairs of animals.
And there would have been no fishing off the boat.
The seas would have been DEAD.
And Noah and his family would have been spending all day every day removing tons and tons of animal poop and pee ... all day long. No time for anything else.

a reply to: FlyersFan

Well s@it FlyersFan, i certainly would not be wanting to go on that magic boat sex cruise year-long tour.

Sounds more like a working holiday, to be honest.

Wonder what the pay is, unicorns dinosaurs or dragons?

originally posted by: FlyersFan

There would have been 8 million pairs of animals.
And there would have been no fishing off the boat.
The seas would have been DEAD.
And Noah and his family would have been spending all day every day removing tons and tons of animal poop and pee ... all day long. No time for anything else.

Sheesh dude you keep saying the same things when it's been answered over and over again. Biblical "kind" does not mean 'species'.

a reply to: cooperton

So what does "biblical kind" mean?

And answer the Koala thing. If you can.

And Pandas. They only eat bamboo shoots. Not fish or carob seeds.

Dude.

a reply to: andy06shake

Those poor unicorns must have missed the boat.

originally posted by: cooperton
Sheesh dude

I'm a girl. Not a dude.

you keep saying the same things

Because you aren't listening.

Biblical "kind" does not mean 'species'.

TRY to let this sink in ... 'kind' doesn't work. It HAS TO BE SPECIES.

Having two housecats on the boat ... they don't magically turn into tigers, lions, cheetah, puma, jaguar, leopard, lynx and the rest of the 37 species of feline in the world. IT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY.

Your 'kinds' fails. It HAS to be SPECIES.

And no ... saying that dog breeders manipulating dog breeds within 100 years doesn't cut it. Thats human manipulation and it's BREEDS .. not SPECIES.

16 million animals ... that's 2 of 8 million different species.

They couldn't fit and the poop and pee would have overwhelmed the crew.

MORE PROOF there was NO NOAHS FLOOD.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

That "Love Boat" does sound rather brutal.

Maybe for the best really.

After all by all accounts, they were somewhat horny creatures.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
And answer the Koala thing. If you can.

He can't. So he runs from the truth of it.

Koalas can't get from Australia to the Middle East.
And no .. the continents were not different in 2400BC.
The Koalas couldn't have walked it even if they were.
They are very slow and sleep 20 hours a day.
And Koalas need eucalyptus to survive.

Koalas (and Kangaroos!) are more proof of no Noahs Ark.