It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Quadrivium
They sentenced a guy to prison for more than 10 years for posting a meme.
They sent a guy to prison for 22 years for Jan 6th who wasn't even in DC.
While pedophiles get maybe 6 months.
The justice system is broken.
If that is wrong, please explain why.
Financial statement fraud can take multiple forms, including:
Overstating revenues by recording future expected sales
Inflating an asset's net worth by knowingly failing to apply an appropriate depreciation schedule
Hiding obligations and/or liabilities from a company's balance sheet
Incorrectly disclosing related-party transactions and structured finance deals
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is a federal law that expands reporting requirements for all U.S. public company boards, management, and public accounting firms. The Act, often abbreviated as Sarbanes–Oxley or SOX, was established by Congress to ensure that companies report their financials honestly and to protect investors.
www.investopedia.com...#:~:text=Financial%20statement%20fraud%20can%20take,from%2 0a%20company's%20balance%20sheet
originally posted by: PurpleFox
originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: network dude
Nice try ND but these fools will never understand what’s going in here.
They understand. They know exactly what they’re doing. And it’s disgusting.
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Quadrivium
I think you're mistaken. These aren't classic liberals, these are hard corps communists.
originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: matafuchs
My house is worth almost 10 times as much as I paid in 8os, and its just a lousy 1800 sq ft tract home.
originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: Quadrivium
How are these civil proceedings meant to jail Trump?
originally posted by: Quadrivium
originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: CanadianLoudMouth
I don't disagree that it would be on the loan agency/bank to do their due diligence, but regardless of that it's still fraud to lie about the value of your holdings in legal documents.
So, it's a lie if an owner believes his property is valued at X and others see it valued at Y?
I personally see my property at quite a bit higher than the taxed value. It's worth whatever I believe it to be, and up to others to determine whether they would want to pay what I value it as. Same with requesting a loan; they can either accept my evaluation or come up with a counter proposal.
Have you ever taken a loan??
They don't just "accept my evaluation or come up with a counter proposal"....
What an absurd notion.
They do their due diligence because they are out to MAKE a profit. That is why you have appraisals and insurance value.
Your personal evaluation means little to nothing. They will loan you what THEY think it is worth and you have to come up with the excess.