Trump judge issues limited gag order after disparaging post about court clerk

a reply to: andy06shake

Coco the Clown?

Good thing the trial is not in that wreck of a country. Fix your own mess before chiming in on your high horse buddy. a reply to: Oldcarpy2

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Right, it's just your double standard.

a reply to: TacoLoco75

Way to go! Buddy.

a reply to: matafuchs

Oh, because he said 'witch-hunt' and girlfriend and all those other vile accusations.

a reply to: andy06shake

Because y'all dont have the same civil rights we have. Im sorry you don't.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

It's a big Mini.

www.nytimes.com...

a reply to: Threadbare

Wow.... hopefully they throw the book at that crazy freak.

a reply to: Mahogany

What was the 'threat' he made, and what did he say that 'intimidated' her?

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

If he violates his gag order he could be looking at 30 days behind bars.

a reply to: andy06shake

The judge made no effort to hide that he has already decided to blow up Trumps businesses in NY.

Why bother with any of this circus act.

Get it moved on up to the appellate court.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

I don't really think it's considered to be a good idea to attempt to personally attack, or dox members of the court, no matter where you are, or in which court one happens to find oneself, around the world.

Not really much to do with civil rights and more to do with common sense CoyoteAngels.

As I'm sure Trump's lawyers have endeavored to make that clear, not that he will listen.

a reply to: Threadbare

Yep, that will be interesting. SS and all.

You and I both know that judge is just itching to do it, too!

a reply to: andy06shake

I would pay $100 bucks to watch them nominate TRUMP.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Please don't lecture us Brits about civil rights.

You've only had them since the 60s?

www.history.com...

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Why bother with any of this circus act.

Stab in the dark, because justice has to be seen to be done.

Get it moved on up to the appellate court.

Do you imagine the "appellate court" will look favorably on Trump personally attacking and doxing members of the court?

Again that doesn't look good or bode well in the appeals court nether, i don't imagine thats much different your side of the pond.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Double. my bad.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Based on the judge's comments, it sounds like first up would be severe sanctions for violating the gag order.

a reply to: Threadbare

You really rip the rights from people you disagree with don't you?

To the point of making a person legally responsible for the acts of strangers.

Because saying 'witchhunt' and 'girlfriend' are so threatening and intimidating and so inspires others to do EVIL.

Dont kid yourself. It's not the law you respect.

a reply to: andy06shake

I don't consider what he said a 'personal attack' nor a 'dox'.