LGBTQ Pride Storybooks in Maryland Public Schools - the battle of national interest

a reply to: ABlackCat

Interesting.

You've made notes a few times now about mods deleting posts.

I've noticed that one could make an argument that you are intentionally trolling to get posts remove that prove your worldview wrong.

How curious.

a reply to: ABlackCat

I've exhausted way too much time in trying to discuss things with you. I have also made my position clear. Yesterday you got close it seemed to having some common ground. Even posted some examples you asked for. You're back today with no comment, and back to being obtuse.

Whatever.

a reply to: JinMI

Yeah, that's why if it's not conducive to thread content, it's basically ignore.

They talk about wanting freedoms, but won't define what freedoms are being denied, other than introducing sexual content to children.

*shrugs*

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: ABlackCat

I've exhausted way too much time in trying to discuss things with you. I have also made my position clear. Yesterday you got close it seemed to having some common ground. Even posted some examples you asked for. You're back today with no comment, and back to being obtuse.

Whatever.

I am not sure if you wanted me to forget but didn't you say you'd give me some evidence/examples of those types of books being taught in Pre-K-6?

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: ABlackCat

I've exhausted way too much time in trying to discuss things with you. I have also made my position clear. Yesterday you got close it seemed to having some common ground. Even posted some examples you asked for. You're back today with no comment, and back to being obtuse.

Whatever.

I am not sure if you wanted me to forget but didn't you say you'd give me some evidence/examples of those types of books being taught in Pre-K-6?

Yeah. They're back x amount of pages. I posted last night when I came back.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Youd think we would get used to it.

Youd think it would be universally accepted to leave the kids alone.



Yet, here we both are

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: ABlackCat

I've exhausted way too much time in trying to discuss things with you. I have also made my position clear. Yesterday you got close it seemed to having some common ground. Even posted some examples you asked for. You're back today with no comment, and back to being obtuse.

Whatever.

I am not sure if you wanted me to forget but didn't you say you'd give me some evidence/examples of those types of books being taught in Pre-K-6?

Yeah. They're back x amount of pages. I posted last night when I came back.

I looked through. I started at, I think, the 35th page.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DBCowboy

Youd think we would get used to it.

Youd think it would be universally accepted to leave the kids alone.



Yet, here we both are

It's more about dissolving the rights of parents than it is being touted as being "inclusive".

When were they not inclusive?

originally posted by: ABlackCat
I looked through. I started at, I think, the 35th page.

.....

Yeah I guess if you're too lazy to find it yourself that's a good reason.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I'm not sure, but what I can say is the line was probably crossed when someone deemed what another parent should be doing with their child.

Just a hunch.

I mean, there's no shortage of authoritarians here.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DBCowboy

Youd think we would get used to it.

Youd think it would be universally accepted to leave the kids alone.



Yet, here we both are

It's more about dissolving the rights of parents than it is being touted as being "inclusive".

When were they not inclusive?

Not about the parents.

It’s about the kids.

a reply to: Annee

It’s about the kids.

We know.


That's the problem.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DBCowboy

Youd think we would get used to it.

Youd think it would be universally accepted to leave the kids alone.



Yet, here we both are

It's more about dissolving the rights of parents than it is being touted as being "inclusive".

When were they not inclusive?

Not about the parents.

It’s about the kids.

It's about parents having the right to determine their childrens education.

So it definitely IS about the parents, might want to read the OP.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DBCowboy

I'm not sure, but what I can say is the line was probably crossed when someone deemed what another parent should be doing with their child.

Just a hunch.

I mean, there's no shortage of authoritarians here.

I use Collective or Marxist, but authoritarian works well also.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DBCowboy

Youd think we would get used to it.

Youd think it would be universally accepted to leave the kids alone.



Yet, here we both are

It's more about dissolving the rights of parents than it is being touted as being "inclusive".

When were they not inclusive?

Not about the parents.

It’s about the kids.

It's about parents having the right to determine their childrens education.

So it definitely IS about the parents, might want to read the OP.

We know the topic. It's about parents wanting to opt out of certain books being used in classrooms.

They, like you, think it's sexual in natural.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Compromise?

Authoritarians under a Marxist ideology.