LIVE: Congress holds UFO hearing.

So, what did they do with the grifters? I took a Knapp then somebody rung my Corbell...I mean the doorbell.

Did they speak? Or just called out the names.

originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: putnam6

Put it this way, there are likely past and present ATS members that never thought what we just saw would occur.

And that can be underlined, for pushing the subject if mainstream can't touch this it means they're funded by those who reject this hearings...

Not gonna lie, that kind of pisses me off after all the other must events all the networks have covered non-stop

I watched it on News Nation which I semi-despise, but it wasn't on anywhere else was it?

Somebody somewhere made a decision and told them not to cover it.

The hearing was on the same day the three media giants were obsessing over the Hunter Biden story where he went to plead.

And Grusch came out the day Steven Greer had his ufo shindig...
Coincidence?

Or a media curtain to veil this subject.

The next big UAP event may again have a media distraction.

Of course, the ufo buffs won't be distracted but the general public will be distracted, and that is a hidden power we can’t fight, easily.

Amazing how this is not on BBC news front page now. The guy in congress said the biological matter found at the crash site was not human. I doubt he means a dead racoon. He could say no more. The rest was confidential. And discussed in private with congress, that says a lot.... Non-human from a crash site... this is big news.

The details were telling.

The test site for the navy was big and made empty. Yet here is this flying tictac with no heat exhaust signature.

The media are annoyingly ignorant of it.

I keep reading that Congress and the guy working for the DoD were blocked from investigating the UFOs.
I thought the DoD and Congress were as high up as you could get in the US? Who has the power to stop these departments from investigating? I am intrigued.

a reply to: jonnyc55

Amazing how this is not on BBC news front page now.

It was earlier.

www.bbc.com...

a reply to: putnam6

Yep, I like the way he nitpicks and tries to stay planted in reality.

I watched the whole hearing, so It will be interesting to see when he does an in-depth analysis.

Point being, how is it not headlines anymore. Instead it ain't front page now... wtf.. kevin spacey who gives a **** , how about these credible men with this information. It hints strongly to ETs. The details matter here, like i said non-human biological matter at a crash site, the rest of the info is credential and for a private hearing with congress... have people lost the ability to connect the dots. reply to: alldaylong

People are left not knowing a very thought provoking hearing. Sad. Media failed badly here. And/or people are too brain dead to process in-between the lines.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
This would be my opening statement...

You will never get the truth from the, any, government. Why? Because enemy (Alien) operatives run the governments. So of course they are not going to allow the truth to be revealed.
You are born with no memories as to where you, your soul comes from for a reason. You can be told any crap what so ever and you have no reasons to doubt it. You are born into a lie. You actually live, on a "Alien" planet and they manage it via secret societies and cloaked operatives. You are nothing but cattle to them, to be managed, used in any way they wish. Great wars and floods destroyed our history and the enemy took full advantage of this.
Good luck.

I agree ...

A lot of "I tell you, I saw this and that" without any real evidence.... again again again....

originally posted by: dothedew
Tid bit to point out - It's not always what they say, but what they DON'T say.

I agree, I said exactly that on another forum a couple of days ago.

When you're asked if you know whether or not the government has made contact with Aliens and your response is:

*"That's something I can't discuss in a public setting"*

.......... That's a Yes. You said Yes without saying Yes.

In that case something was said, and it was that something that made you think it's a "Yes".

It could have been said on purpose so people thought it meant a "Yes".

The other telling thing that was said was that he wanted to keep an open mind and not refer to them as alien or extra-terrestrial in nature because there may be more to their origin than that. The only clear statement was that they are not human. Is it just me, or is their more to read between the lines here? Admiral Byrd? Multi-dimensional beings?

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Interesting comment about Christians and Muslims getting over it.

Always got to get in a dig, right?

originally posted by: Silcone Synapse
When asked if these things could be doing reconn and could be looking for vunerabilities in defence-all three witnesses agreed-Yes they were.

Did they say "yes they were" or "yes they could"?

a reply to: putnam6

I really understand that most don't trust that this is going nowhere, because of the sheer power that lies behind thise secrets.

But pushing the envelope by social media ,and because mainstream is losing that battle because there are Podcasters out there that do coverage way better than msn does frightens them.

I think good Podcasters breaking this story and multiply that by copy and paste casters will eventually be more powerful as all msn together

On the questions of clearance’s….

Mr. Gaetz: Mr. Burchett if you'll yield so just to be put a fine point on that. There's nothing that you're aware of that's above special access program classification.

Grusch: It's a misnomer that there's anything actually above top secret. Executive Order 13526 delineates classification levels.

Mr. Gaetz: Right. But I draw a point on that because we can have access to those programs. And so the notion that we're not being given that access sort of defies our typical muscle memory here in Congress.

The President Executive Order 13526

Mr. Burchett: You may not know this or not but Title 10 and Title 50 authorization they seem to say they're inefficient. So who gets to decide this in your opinion in the past?

Grusch: It's a group of career senior executive officials.

Mr. Burchett: Okay. Are they government officials?

Grusch: Both in and out.

Mr. Burchett: Do what?

Grusch: Both in and out of government and that's about as far as I can go there.

Mr Burchett: I got you. All right.

Majestic 12

Is Majestic 12 ….alive and well???

👽

Interesting press conference, I was hoping for the outcome. We did not get knees deep in the matter but I think we dipped our toes and there was a willingness to share and learn more from everyone, the future will bring more insight in this matter. Interesting times to be alive.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1
That's dubious, could also mean in out planetary boundaries?

The time this is going to take to get to the bottom , will also give them time enough to transport their whole inventory of secrets to the Moon or Mars eventually finding oil stains in hangars

If someone gains access to something as extraordinary as intelligent non-human life, he/she should take a photo of the evidences...body(s)...documents...whatever.

Something isn't right here: www.foxnews.com...

Particularly when you consider a part-time National Guard guy accessed and posted online Super Top Secret information a few months ago.

This "Whistleblower" should have obtained something concrete before becoming a whistleblower over something so spectacular.

a reply to: jonnyc55

It might be a good thing that, for the moment at least, the general media. The "MSM", are taking a "below the fold" (old newspaper idiom) approach.

Save the media circus act for later, once the the especially skittish whistle-blowers have had a chance to be drawn out and deposed, and at least some of the lower-to-middle level "gatekeepers" have been exposed for what they are and who they might be working for.


Too much MSM attention this early in this phase of the "game" could easily see the effort bog down in spurious "wannabe's" with stories to tell (and sell!)....


...some of them sent forth by those who would rather the effort be discredited.