It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

LIVE: Congress holds UFO hearing.

page: 24
45
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 15 2023 @ 10:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1


Chicken Wings!


Ha ha. Wonder how this next episode will go. You might need a 6 pack to go with them wings Ophi.






posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 03:39 AM
link   
a reply to: introufo

Who knows re Serpo.

Am reminded of this blogg .

badufos.blogspot.com...





edit on 16-8-2023 by Baablacksheep because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 06:04 AM
link   
"i can't disclose my sources...or I can't tell you but maybe next week"

All four, Grusch, Foxx, Corbell, and Coulthart withhold more information than the people they are accusing of withholding information.



posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 07:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: introufo

The event registration…..I don’t know if it’s for live participation or live streaming

The Truth is Out There registration

Chicken Wings!

👽


Really…….When you think about what the registration form is asking……look carefully….imo …it’s a way to overtly collect information about you…for the IC.

It is said that all media has at least 1 CIA person or mole on an editorial review board.

The Hill….is a politically based org…….why create such an event that just about narrows the partipation to a focused group of professional attendees?

Why doesn’t the Hill offer this event like the government streaming hearings for all the world to see free of any data collection about any individual wanting to see it?

This Hill event has public figures speakers (congressional representatives) from the government that should be accessible without personal requirements.

This topic is of a public worldwide interest and transparent importance.

The Hill won’t be getting my personal information……that’s for sure ….besides I’m retired and no company to be employed too for registration purposes.

I don’t trust them…..imo

Btw….I see they’ve added the news anchor from News Nation as a second moderator ……more bait?…. To get one to sign up and register with their personal info? Hmmmm

☕️🍩

👽

edit on 16-8-2023 by Ophiuchus1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 08:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Maybe we will learn more later about this Ophi.




posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: introufo

The event registration…..I don’t know if it’s for live participation or live streaming

The Truth is Out There registration

Chicken Wings!

👽



Why are we registering?

Just one of those bs registrations?

The CIA knows me from way back—they don’t need my new name.



posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 11:25 AM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Yes, I agree Ophi. Why do they want our names?



posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: quintessentone

Name and email I think it's acceptable, to avoid duplicate registrations, but why do they need to know:
JOB TITLE
COMPANY NAME
STATE
WHAT SECTOR DO YOU MOST ASSOCIATE WITH YOUR OCCUPATION?
WHAT IS YOUR ROLE WITHIN YOUR ORGANIZATION?

I don't see any reason for all that information.

PS: and it only accepts US states, so they do not allow non-US registrations.



posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 12:01 PM
link   
a reply to: ArMaP

Nice little honeypot.

I will not be registering.



posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 01:52 PM
link   
a reply to: ArMaP

Let’s do some hypothesizing…..

So there’s a contractor employee from let’s say Boeing….who’s in a UAP SAP and he/she is dumb enough to register. So now they (IC’s etc.) have a person who want’s to stay in the shadows ….but can’t resist wanting to know what the conversation of the event will bring out. The IC’s will suspect the person is possibly and potentially a compromiser, or is a possible sympathizer to Whistleblower’s…..and probably be put on a monitored Watch List… so to speak.

No different then what the KGB, Mossad, SS, etc….would do.

As for being internal to the U.S……sure why not? It’s a National concentrated effort within the U.S.’s borders. The event in my suspicion is controlled. The rest of the world as interested as they are, should be included….but they don’t have a need to know as far as the domestic IC’s are probably concerned.

More than likely…..those that registered might be flagged if they put down that they work at Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and BAE to name a few contractor primes.

And it’s not like The Hill is offering Monthly UAP Newsletter’s either.

Jus thinkin…

👽
edit on 16-8-2023 by Ophiuchus1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 01:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: ArMaP

Let’s do some hypothesizing…..

So there’s a contractor employee from let’s say Boeing….who’s in a UAP SAP and he/she is dumb enough to register. So now they (IC’s etc.) have a person who want’s to stay in the shadows ….but can’t resist wanting to know what the conversation of the event will bring out. The IC’s will suspect the person is possibly and potentially a compromiser, or is a possible sympathizer to Whistleblower’s…..and probably be put on a monitored Watch List… so to speak.

No different then what the KGB, Mossad, SS, etc….would do.

As for being internal to the U.S……sure why not? It’s National concentrated effort. The event is controlled. The rest of the world as interested as they are, should be included….but they don’t have a need to know according to the domestic IC’s.

Jus thinkin…

👽


I mean if you read the first page of wearenotalone.splashthat.com... why do we have to push for transparency? Where is full disclosure? (famous last words, not)



posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 03:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

What it might be all about is they’re monitoring this thing because they want to know the interest the country has in UAPs.

That may be one of these ops’ reasons for being--to gauge the interest in ufos...

They likely have psychological profiles of who would be interested... None of my friends or associates outside of the old ufo buffs have been drawn into this web...

So, I basically don’t think the general public is interested. It has a novel tabloid drawing like the old supermarket line Enquirer ufology, with a picture of an ET with a head the size of a washing machine.



posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 03:51 PM
link   
a reply to: introufo



an ET with a head the size of a washing machine.


Sorry that made me chuckle a wee bit.





posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 03:53 PM
link   
a reply to: quintessentone


Where is full disclosure?


In your dreamies if you want something quickly. It will be a slow process by the looks of things and what would you expect full disclosure to be anyway?


edit on 16-8-2023 by Baablacksheep because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2023 @ 10:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: introufo
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

It has a novel tabloid drawing like the old supermarket line Enquirer ufology, with a picture of an ET with a head the size of a washing machine.



Or…you mean like this?

👽



posted on Aug, 17 2023 @ 06:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

originally posted by: introufo
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

It has a novel tabloid drawing like the old supermarket line Enquirer ufology, with a picture of an ET with a head the size of a washing machine.



Or…you mean like this?

👽


Best investigative reporting on the planet. Read the New York Times if you want. They get lucky sometimes.




Maybe NASA are going to fess up about contact with aliens back in 1962?



posted on Aug, 17 2023 @ 06:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: quintessentone


Where is full disclosure?


In your dreamies if you want something quickly. It will be a slow process by the looks of things and what would you expect full disclosure to be anyway?



I expect the whole enchilada, maybe the Enquirer is the way to go.



posted on Aug, 17 2023 @ 06:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
Or…you mean like this?

👽
So there may really be documentation to support Grusch's claims?

Until we see it, it's hard to judge how good it is, but anyway I don't want to hear from Grush saying someone told him they saw something, I want to hear from the original source who actually saw something, and exactly how they determined the "non-human biologic" claim. Why do I feel like Charlie Brown trying to kick the football right before Lucy pulls it away again? I have this feeling of deja vu, that proof never seems to materialize.

edit on 2023817 by Arbitrageur because: clarification



posted on Aug, 17 2023 @ 07:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Arbitrageur



I want to hear from the original source who actually saw something, and exactly how they determined the "non-human biologic" claim.


That would be nice.






posted on Aug, 17 2023 @ 09:40 AM
link   
a reply to: mirageman

I was writing and looking for a pic of this...then saw this---right on time.

Hollywood should do a spoof on this TTSA alien/ufo era they created: have the spooks parodied by Peter Sellors and Cahrlie Chaplin-like actor comedians: spoof the military sinister creeps doing all kinds of bumbling antics, and the crazy UFO buffs foaming at the mouth with tales of aliens in caves eating arms and legs of goats and babies; then have your ROCK GUY---spinning wheels and tales of evil aliens, spectacular antigravity saucers, along with the usual obsessive but serious looking UFOlogist in mainstream science making damn fools of themselves... I mean the whole gamut of crazy, sort of like in the vein of that 1980s spoof comedy Airplane.

Hollywood should do that. The CIA might finance it.

Of course, MIB was just that, but this would be a direct ufo themed spoof.

I wonder if something like that is in the works.


And, of course, don't leave out the groveling politicians who have nothing better to do.
edit on 17-8-2023 by introufo because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
45
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join



viewport: 1280 x 720 | document: 1280 x 11127