It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mace: Okay, so and you may or may not be able to answer my last question and maybe we get into a SCIF at the next hearing that we have, but who in the government either, what agency, sub-agency, what contractors, who should be called into the next hearing about UAPs either in a public setting or even in a private setting and you probably can't name names, but what agencies, organizations, contractors, etc. do we need to call in to get these questions answered? What about funding, what programs are happening and what's out there?
Grusch: I can give you a specific cooperative and hostile witness list of specific individuals that were in those.
Mace: And how soon can we get that list?
Grusch: I'm happy to provide that to you after the hearing.
Mace: Super, thank you and I yield back.
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
I found this verbatim dialogue to be somewhat revealing…..
Mace: Okay, so and you may or may not be able to answer my last question and maybe we get into a SCIF at the next hearing that we have, but who in the government either, what agency, sub-agency, what contractors, who should be called into the next hearing about UAPs either in a public setting or even in a private setting and you probably can't name names, but what agencies, organizations, contractors, etc. do we need to call in to get these questions answered? What about funding, what programs are happening and what's out there?
Grusch: I can give you a specific cooperative and hostile witness list of specific individuals that were in those.
Mace: And how soon can we get that list?
Grusch: I'm happy to provide that to you after the hearing.
Mace: Super, thank you and I yield back.
….notice there were no strings attached to this request. Grusch didn’t say that he could only provide what she requested…..in a SCIF, closed environment.
That says to me….that that list would become part of the congressional record….BUT….also for public viewing…..imo.
If that’s the case….it would be nice to see the list of cooperative and hostile witnesses.
👽
originally posted by: quintessentone
Except we need to find an Earth II because this one is cooked.
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
Hi Ophi, so at 1:00:42 on the vid the Head of AARO (Kirkpatrick) put out a statement that they have not found any credible evidence to support the allegations of any reverse technology program for non-human technology. Back to square one?
U.S. Rep. Glenn Grothman, R-Glenbeulah, chaired last week's House hearing on "unidentified anomalous phenomena," or UAPs, at which a former intelligence official claimed the U.S. government was concealing evidence of alien life. David Grusch, a former Air Force intelligence officer, told Congress he had learned of "a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse-engineering program." Grusch, who has been characterized as a whistleblower, did not offer evidence for his claims and declined to answer some questions from committee members, saying it would involve classified material.
The hearing was fodder for wild speculation online, though officials with NASA and the Pentagon have said they do not have evidence of extraterrestrial materials, let alone beings.
Appearing Friday on Wisconsin Public Radio's "Central Time," Grothman acknowledged that the hearing had by far the most public interest of any he's seen recently. And he said there is a legitimate public interest in understanding what the government knows about UAPs that have been spotted. "Is it something that other nations have developed that we are nowhere near developing? We ought to know that," Grothman said. "And if it is something from outer space, and there are other people monitoring us, well, we ought to know that." Grothman said he wants to see "a little more transparency from the military" on the matter.