Donald Trump Announced He Received A Target Letter From Smith For Jan 6th Investigation

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: knoxie

Whats amusing is that you laugh at a politician that does the same as all politicians: fund raise.

It's a necessary evil, unless you want all elections to be govt funded?

I guess you feel its preferrable to just not campaign, not fund raise, just rig the machines instead, with a compliant media running cover?

Stop twisting the facts. The person you responded to is saying that Trump is fund raising off the charges against him, and the news that he is targeted for more indictments. How many other politicians do that? Not too many. Moreover, Trump is using this campaign money he gets to pay his legal fees, not to campaign, by funneling into a particular PAC of his, so he is misrepresenting what campaign donations to him go to as well.

originally posted by: PurpleFox

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: nugget1

I see it more as anybody who tries to subvert the transfer of power and remain in office even though they lost, will face the consequences.

You would see it that way but in reality, that’s not what happened.

BTW, Trump is absolutely correct saying that he is completely within his rights to protest the outcome.
Remember when Al Gore held up the election for 36 days in 2000 because he didn’t like outcome in Florida?

As if the left didn’t spend 4+ years freaking out about the 2016 elections, saying basically the exact same thing we are saying now.

Can’t trust these ppl with anything.

I don't recall Democrats storming the capitol in Jan 2017 to stop the certification of Trump's election. Also don't recall HRC complaining about the election being stolen from her for over two and a half years after the fact. Nor were Democrats claiming the elections were rigged. They have said that HRC won the popular vote over Trump, which is true, not that it makes a difference, and they allege that there was election interference by Russia, which the Mueller investigation found to be the case.

You're claiming false equivalents as Trump cultists are wont to do, because they have no other way to defend their cult leader.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: Threadbare

Small CC donations. It's how Obama laundered foreign campaign cash too.

How about provide some evidence of this, if you are going to make this claim.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: WeDemBoyz

"given the venue"

So you admit he wont get a fair trial?

And this is ok with you?

I think the person is just assuming there won't be any MAGA cultists on the jury in DC, who could hang it, unlike the case in South Florida.

a reply to: MrInquisitive
Your ppl burned down cities. Mueller did not say that.

My TV told me Russia literally hacked our elections and added votes for trump. Were you living under a rock then?

My cult is America and freedom. You should try it.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: RazorV66

Protesting is his right. A recount, his right. Bringing court cases, his right. We can't say at this point what charges even will potentially be. Have to wait for the indictment if it comes and the evidence from all of those around him and working with him and testified in court to see the full scope of the crime. I mean you're free to object to evidence from his own people if you so choose.

I know it’s been asked a million times without a coherent answer but………

What crime?

Well, we'll have to wait to see the indictments, but I'd hazard to guess that attempted election fraud and sedition will be amongst the charges. Here's an article on the subject and the possible crimes he and others might be charged with.

Insurrection

Obstruction of an official proceeding

Conspiracy to defraud the United States

Conspiracy to make a false statement

What criminal charges might Trump face if indicted in January 6 investigation?

Evidently you never bothered spending 10 seconds to google "potential crimes by trump related to january 6" and skim through even one article on the subject.

originally posted by: watchitburn

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

The vast majority of the donations are from small donors that are donating less than $200.

They've already been exposed on that fraud.

Soros donates 10s of millions to some group or PA. Then it gets laundered through thousands of unknowing, incapacitated, or dead people in amounts of $200 or less.

They've already been caught, but no DA or federal prosecuter will ever go after their own.

How about backing up those claims with some evidence? All you Trump cultists ever do is make specious allegations.

As for your claim that there will be no election in 2024, I wouldn't bet the farm on that.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: WeDemBoyz
Please go and view a video called "Everything wrong with the capitol shooting in 21 minutes or less". It's only the earlier part, there will be a part 2, it's an accurate timeline of that day. With actual video evidence you can see with your own eyes. The "actors" of this "insurrection" were getting all the "weapons" and scenes set up even before Trump had even taken the stage. And if you come back with your same view then there is no answer to your dilemma.

There’s no use trying to flip these guy’s mindsets.
None of them can really come up with any legitimate answers why they don’t like Trump except for character issues.
Policy wise, they are stumped because Biden’s policies are sh!t compared to Trump’s.

These are the same people that have a meltdown because Trump said “Grab em by the pussy” but they love a man with a penis that pretends he is a woman and they love drag shows where they are flopping everything out in front of kids.

You can’t reason with these people.

What a load of crap. Trump's problematic administration has been discussed any number of times. You're just willfully ignoring what has been brought up many times before.

As for preferring a transgender person who only does things consensually with other adults over a self-professed serial sexual assaulter, yes guilty as charged.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: WeDemBoyz

So are all judges that Trump appointed being disqualified? Of course! That's how the left rolls.

The venue would be DC, and you slightly move the goalpost to judge because I called you on it.

You readily admit you don't care if he has a fair trial. As long as he is GONE.

So now you are out and out LYING. Judge Aileen Cannon, who is overseeing the Mar-a-Lago documents case, is a Trump appointee. So no, all Trump-appointed judges aren't be disqualified. Liar, liar, pants on fire, oh great Mendacious One.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: Ravenwatcher

As I've pointed out a number of times, the investigations into Trump predate his candidacy by almost a year. Should we just stop investigating anyone for anything due to the chance they may choose to run for office in the future?

And as we have all pointed out a number of times, 8 years of investigations have proven nothing at all.

Either Trump is the world’s greatest criminal mastermind and your guys are completely inept for not getting him on anything or Trump is clean.
Those are the only 2 answers, which one is it?

The walking crime spree of am ex-president currently has 71 indictments against in state and federal courts, so your claim that 8 years of investigations have not proven anything is a bit weak. Sure, we have to wait until the court cases are decided for proof per se, but that is how the criminal justice system works.

Last time I checked the Trump supporters here have been wanting to know why Biden isn't already hung for treason. Seems your fellow travelers have a two-sided justice system in their heads.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: RazorV66

Protesting is his right. A recount, his right. Bringing court cases, his right. We can't say at this point what charges even will potentially be. Have to wait for the indictment if it comes and the evidence from all of those around him and working with him and testified in court to see the full scope of the crime. I mean you're free to object to evidence from his own people if you so choose.

I know it’s been asked a million times without a coherent answer but………

What crime?

I'm not a lawyer, but the crimes I've seen discussed by people who are lawyers are:

18 U.S.C. § 371—CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES:

www.justice.gov...#:~:text=The%20general%20conspiracy%20statute%2C%2018 ,manner%20or%20for%20any%20purpose.

and

18 U.S.C. 595 - Interference by administrative employees of Federal, State, or Territorial Governments

www.govinfo.gov...

Sure.
I am pretty sure Biden and his goons could be charged with those as well.

You're pretty sure of that, huh? That's what you Trump cultists do. You claim the same crimes against your cult leader's rival as are charged against your cult leader, but provide no evidence.

a reply to: wdkirk

He’s been a target since he left office is the point.

he's been a target since 2015, the dem ones, two face conservatives and rino's have been hounding him ever since. he wasn't one of them and that scared the sh@@ out of the swamp.

a reply to: MrInquisitive


Name 5 things the Democrats have done to help American citizens since Biden took office.

Name 5 things Trump has done policy wise to make you hate him.

a reply to: MrInquisitive

Which case did the SCOTUS hear?

a reply to: MrInquisitive

Mom! He's not supposed to DO that! Fund raise on his indictments! How dare he? He needs to stop fighting and say uncle.... but he wont!

a reply to: MrInquisitive

Where did I say she isn''t a Trump nominated judge?

Quote me before you call me a liar. And if you can't, then GFY

a reply to: MrInquisitive

There are videos, multiple, of HRC saying he is an illegitimate president. Tons of others so stop with that BS.
There was more damage and injuries in the days following 45's election than 1/6. A fact. HRC had a womans group all lined up because she was going to win and she didn't and pink pussy hats appeared.

It is like no one want to remember the violence that happened in the US for 4 F'N years!!!!! It was not Republicans. They were all busy starting businesses and hiring people and building the country.

There is no cult. It is an ideology if anything that 10 million more in 2020 wanted. 10 million and still lost? Stop...

There is only one way to stop Donald Trump and it scares me to think our own government would do it but then I think about JFK and RFK...

a reply to: MrInquisitive

He held up the transition. Im sure it was a mistype.

geez

a reply to: Ravenwatcher

Ive learned over life that if you listen, people will TELL you who they are and what they are doing.

The problem is, we don't listen, or we don't take them seriously.

a reply to: Threadbare

Be honest, the investigations of Mr. Trump started in 2015 (or even earlier) and have not ended since. They are ongoing.