Donald Trump Announced He Received A Target Letter From Smith For Jan 6th Investigation

a reply to: Threadbare

No one is saying that. However, if you use some basic critical thinking you see it plain as day. For gods sake the DNC does it to their own. Bernie had the nomination in 2016. They stole it from him. Sure, his wife got some charges dropped and he bought another home but HRC was not the chosen nominee. If a person will do it to their own you really think they have any regard for those they hate?

Legislative, Executive and Judicial. Checks and balances. However, when you have a DOJ that overlooks crimes of their own party and then goes after ANY of their opposition it is weaponization.

THIS is how ludicrous the MSM is.

Link< br />

CNN anchors John King and Dana Bash agreed that footage of Special Counsel Jack Smith going to Subway for lunch was some sort of “message” to ex-President Donald Trump.

When Trump announced Tuesday that he’s about to be indicted in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Trump’s conduct surrounding the 2020 election and the January 6 attack on the Capitol, CNN went into wall-to-wall coverage mode.

On Tuesday afternoon’s edition of CNN News Central, that coverage included footage of Smith scoring a $5 Foot-Long or some such at a Florida Subway restaurant.

Reporting on location from Florida, CNN correspondent Katelyn Polantz rolled the video and reported “Jack Smith is tight-lipped. He was spotted today by CNN going to Subway for lunch, picking up a sandwich, leaving and not saying a word.”


Jack Smith going to Subway today is a message to Donald Trump. Donald Trump tries to intimidate people. He tries to bully people. He tries to scare you away. That was Jack Smith, with no words and a simple $5 sub in his hand, saying I’m here. I’m not going anywhere. DANA BASH: Yeah, the imagery was, was intentional and spoke volumes.

Subway. Going to Subway is now sending a message. CLOWN WORLD!

a reply to: matafuchs

Kind of like launching a multi-year investigation into the son of your political opponent in an attempt to hurt your political opponent?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

So you're saying I should be able to commit a crime and be let go if I tell law enforcement that I'm running for President because I'm now a political opponent of the current administration?

the left is STILL trying to find SOMETHING!

Also, does this cut both ways. Biden is a political opponent of Trump. Why aren't you decrying Trump's allies in Congress running multiple investigations into Biden? How is what the DOJ is doing election interference but what members of Congress are doing not?

Biden is president.

His DoJ is indicting Biden's political opponent.

If Trump gets knocked out, when is Biden going to indict DeSantis?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: matafuchs

Kind of like launching a multi-year investigation into the son of your political opponent in an attempt to hurt your political opponent?

10% for the Big Guy.

a reply to: Threadbare

Trump did no such thing while in office. Out of office he is not investigating anything either. Pointing out he is a crackhead is not a crime. TMZ says worse.

Again, it is not the person it is what is being done I do not like. I honestly do not want to see Obama indicted or arrested even though he droned the teen age son of a terrorist who as a US citizen. I would think that would garner an impeachment hearing for killing someone. Even Bush or Cheney. They did shady #. So did Bill...they all did. The difference is they are part of the group and Mr Trump is not. They HAD to allow him in office because they could not take him out of office. They messed up in 2016. They made sure he would not win in 2020. They are pulling him in so many directions anyone else would have folder but he is not. THAT is why people will vote for him.

Bill Clinton was a sitting president who had sex in the oval office, perjured himself and it all...went away. They had tales too.

If you are establishment you stay and if not, in this New Progressive Order, you are removed and pushed aside.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

I'll point out again that these investigations were opened almost a year before Trump announced his candidacy. Should we stop investigating anyone for committing a crime because they might run for office in the future?

He’s been a target since he left office is the point.

a reply to: matafuchs

So the DOJ didn't launch an investigation into Hunter starting in 2018? Trump isn't still complaining that he would have won in 2020 if Twitter would have allowed the dick pics that were leaked from that investigation to be posted?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: matafuchs

So the DOJ didn't launch an investigation into Hunter starting in 2018? Trump isn't still complaining that he would have won in 2020 if Twitter would have allowed the dick pics that were leaked from that investigation to be posted?

Don't you read the news?
The FBI ran interference for the Bidens.

a reply to: DBCowboy

A claim that Weiss completely refutes.

Regardless, how would that change the fact that Trump had the DOJ go after the son of his political rival?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

A claim that Weiss completely refutes.

Regardless, how would that change the fact that Trump had the DOJ go after the son of his political rival?

Because his "son" was collecting money for his "father".

Duh

a reply to: DBCowboy

So if somebody may have broken the law then there's no issue with the DOJ investigating even if it may hurt the current President's political opponent?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: matafuchs

So the DOJ didn't launch an investigation into Hunter starting in 2018? Trump isn't still complaining that he would have won in 2020 if Twitter would have allowed the dick pics that were leaked from that investigation to be posted?

Don't you read the news?
The FBI ran interference for the Bidens.

Either the level of simple mindedness is off the charts around here or they really don’t care how their masters are targeting Trump, just as long as they eliminate him.
Both are equally scary.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

So if somebody may have broken the law then there's no issue with the DOJ investigating even if it may hurt the current President's political opponent?

JESUS!

WHAT HAVEN'T YOU FOUND?

What's next? A FBI colonoscope up Trump's pooper?

a reply to: DBCowboy

It seems like they've found 1154 pages of classified material at MAL that Trump wasn't legally allowed to have in his possession based off today's hearing in Florida.

a reply to: Threadbare

*Alleged


Twas also alleged that he worked with Russia
Twas also alledged that he was somhow improper with Zelensky.


In which the DoJ was complicit in fabricated evidence.

Meanwhile, the current admin has similar allegations.

Notice the difference?

Even more relevent, notice the pattern?

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: matafuchs

So the DOJ didn't launch an investigation into Hunter starting in 2018? Trump isn't still complaining that he would have won in 2020 if Twitter would have allowed the dick pics that were leaked from that investigation to be posted?

Don't you read the news?
The FBI ran interference for the Bidens.

Either the level of simple mindedness is off the charts around here or they really don’t care how their masters are targeting Trump, just as long as they eliminate him.
Both are equally scary.

I honestly feel the American people are being played and pulled to the point of exhaustion.
Some turn the other way because they don't have the energy or power to fight the MSM or social media mobs any more.
Others have honestly been compelled to believe that the MAGA-republicans are worst than Hitler, Stalin, and Mao all rolled into one. And for that reason, they can do ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to bring MAGA to an end.

Wouldn't you break the law to save the world?

I find the rhetoric from both sides to be polarizing and divisive. As long as we continue to grow this hate we will never find the middle ground to meet on again.

You wanna see the end of America? Put an end to a functional government, the end of the country will be close behind. 😒

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: nugget1

I see it more as anybody who tries to subvert the transfer of power and remain in office even though they lost, will face the consequences.

You would see it that way but in reality, that’s not what happened.

BTW, Trump is absolutely correct saying that he is completely within his rights to protest the outcome.
Remember when Al Gore held up the election for 36 days in 2000 because he didn’t like outcome in Florida?

No, Gore did not hold up the election. The election occurred right on time. What he did was challenge the results of the election on account of how close the vote tally was, which was totally within his rights to. Unlike Trump, he didn't litigate the election in multiple states, claiming that the election results were rigged. He also didn't call his supporters to the Capitol on the day the elector votes were to counted to disrupt that process, and he most certainly as VP did not do what Trump wanted Pence to do, i.e. turn over the election. He also didn't continue claiming for years afterwards that the election was stolen from him.

Sure. Trumps is within his rights to protest the election outcome, but is not within his rights to foment violence or sedition over it.

You Trump supporters love to subvert the truth of the matter and make false claims -- just like your cult leader.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

So if somebody may have broken the law then there's no issue with the DOJ investigating even if it may hurt the current President's political opponent?

You’re intentionally being obtuse.

Deeply unserious people. Pathetic.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

It seems like they've found 1154 pages of classified material at MAL that Trump wasn't legally allowed to have in his possession based off today's hearing in Florida.

The president can declassify any document they want.

You know who can’t?

Senators and vice presidents.

HONK HONK