Sweden dumps climate agenda and scraps green energy targets

originally posted by: JumpTheGun76
a reply to: AlienBorg

That's not an alarming rate.
That's alarmism which has no basis in reality.


So if the temperature keeps on rising, marine life will start to vanish, corol reefs will begin tk disappear, ice will melt meaning sea levels will rise, lack of rain means farms will be devastated



No evidence for this exists

What, because its not in our lifetime, that means it's not an alarming rate? Are you being serious here!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Again! You have absolutley no clue what you are talking about! You do not care about the data! You have not looked at the data obviously!

the data doesn't support your claims of climate change catastrophy and end of life here on earth

a reply to: AlienBorg

You haven't made any valid points.
You're going by the end of the world rhetoric based on the warming up of the planet. There is no evidence for any climate change apocalyptic scenario. If you have any show me.

Already bloody have, which you have completley ignored and just keep on saying the same stuff over and over!

a reply to: JumpTheGun76

You still haven't answered why do you think in Sweden they don't believe in man made climate change. Where is your evidence??

originally posted by: AlienBorg
a reply to: JumpTheGun76

Hoe do you know in Sweden they don't believe in climate change (man made- anthropogenic)

How do yoh know they do when they have not once mentioned it and the reason for their u turn had nothing to do with because they think climate change is not man made!

Yoh are the one who made the claim! So where did Sweden say this?

originally posted by: JumpTheGun76
a reply to: AlienBorg

You haven't made any valid points.
You're going by the end of the world rhetoric based on the warming up of the planet. There is no evidence for any climate change apocalyptic scenario. If you have any show me.

Already bloody have, which you have completley ignored and just keep on saying the same stuff over and over!

Nowhere there is evidence for the end of times you're supporting or believing.

originally posted by: JumpTheGun76

originally posted by: AlienBorg
a reply to: JumpTheGun76

Hoe do you know in Sweden they don't believe in climate change (man made- anthropogenic)

How do yoh know they do when they have not once mentioned it and the reason for their u turn had nothing to do with because they think climate change is not man made!

Yoh are the one who made the claim! So where did Sweden say this?

I am afraid you have a short term memory. This is your post not mine.

Also! The reason for Sweden doing this is because they do not believe climate change is man made! They explained perfectly why they are doing this! They badically have to, does not mean they want too!

Page 6

You can't even remember what you said...hohoho

a reply to: AlienBorg

Nowhere there is evidence for the end of times you're supporting or believing.

My God! Just how dense are you! It's scary! Data which has been collected, and the data as we all know is showing the eorld is warming up If the temperature keeps on rising at the same pace every year, they can see what effects this would have on the environment!

We know the ice caps are slready melting! What happens to all thst ice? You think it vanishes into thin air!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

If you cannot be bothered to even look at the data and counter act what is said, then there is seriously no point here!

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: JumpTheGun76

originally posted by: AlienBorg
a reply to: JumpTheGun76

Hoe do you know in Sweden they don't believe in climate change (man made- anthropogenic)

How do yoh know they do when they have not once mentioned it and the reason for their u turn had nothing to do with because they think climate change is not man made!

Yoh are the one who made the claim! So where did Sweden say this?

I am afraid you have a short term memory. This is your post not mine.

Also! The reason for Sweden doing this is because they do not believe climate change is man made! They explained perfectly why they are doing this! They badically have to, does not mean they want too!

Page 6

You can't even remember what you said...hohoho

u]The reason for Sweden doing this is because they do not believe climate change is man made!

Oh, this is hilarious! J make a sentence mistake, which you should know it is a sentence mistake because how many times on this thread have I said Sweden did not mske this decision because they believe that climate is not man made?🤣🤣🤣

You talk about clutching at straws🤣🤣🤣🤣

a reply to: JumpTheGun76

Already bloody have, which you have completley ignored and just keep on saying the same stuff over and over!

The sun has way more to do with our climate than driving suvs or eating meat. Unfortunately, many have taken the words of the alarmists who are on board with the wef and UN Agenda 21/2030, Club ofRome, Bilderbergs etc who want control and power over the masses and who build their own Mansions on the ocean front because they know it’s be.
The sun has been in a quiescent phase, and these cycles have been documented. They have names like the Maunder Minimum. That’s scientific. We are moving into a Grand Solar Minimum due to the quiescent phase of the sun. That also is scientific. Eating beef causing climate change has no scientific basis.
I know it’s interesting to sign on to the scaremongering of the beefeaters club and the radical environmental groups, but we should really be more concerned with staying warm in the next decades. The summers are cooler and wetter now.

en.m.wikipedia.org...#:~:text=During%20solar%20minimum%2C%20sunspot%20and,from%209%20to%2014%20years.

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus

The summers are cooler and wetter now.

Have you even visited planet Earth lately?

www.bbc.co.uk...

a reply to: AndyMayhew

The bbc monthly forecast says:

Unsettled but possibly drier by early August

During the coming fortnight low pressure systems are likely to remain in the vicinity of the UK. As a result unsettled weather will continue with periods of heavy rain or showers, along with occasional thunderstorm risks and brisk, gusty winds at times.

Temperatures will be near or slightly below average at first, rising slightly above normal after mid-July.

Later in the month and into early August there could be a drier trend, although potentially more so in the north of the UK than the south.

originally posted by: JumpTheGun76

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: JumpTheGun76

originally posted by: AlienBorg
a reply to: JumpTheGun76

Hoe do you know in Sweden they don't believe in climate change (man made- anthropogenic)

How do yoh know they do when they have not once mentioned it and the reason for their u turn had nothing to do with because they think climate change is not man made!

Yoh are the one who made the claim! So where did Sweden say this?

I am afraid you have a short term memory. This is your post not mine.

Also! The reason for Sweden doing this is because they do not believe climate change is man made! They explained perfectly why they are doing this! They badically have to, does not mean they want too!

Page 6

You can't even remember what you said...hohoho

u]The reason for Sweden doing this is because they do not believe climate change is man made!

Oh, this is hilarious! J make a sentence mistake, which you should know it is a sentence mistake because how many times on this thread have I said Sweden did not mske this decision because they believe that climate is not man made?🤣🤣🤣

You talk about clutching at straws🤣🤣🤣🤣

Unfortunately for you the posting history proves you wrong

Also! The reason for Sweden doing this is because they do not believe climate change is man made! They explained perfectly why they are doing this! They badically have to, does not mean they want too

Do you now claim you made a sentence mistake?! Really??!! That's s new claim neither great nor convincing.

But what you say above is clear, Sweden doing this because they don't believe in anthropogenic climate change. Your own words.

You are all over the place.

a reply to: AndyMayhew

Are we sure it's co2 that is making the oceans warmer?

Plastic pollution in the oceans is highly doubling, and it's causing more ocean warming by changing the climate as the plastics break down into methane and ethylene. The plastics on the surface trap sunlight and make the ocean's surface get hot, blocking the light and heat from getting into the in-depth ocean.

originally posted by: JumpTheGun76
a reply to: AlienBorg

Nowhere there is evidence for the end of times you're supporting or believing.

My God! Just how dense are you! It's scary! Data which has been collected, and the data as we all know is showing the eorld is warming up If the temperature keeps on rising at the same pace every year, they can see what effects this would have on the environment!

We know the ice caps are slready melting! What happens to all thst ice? You think it vanishes into thin air!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

If you cannot be bothered to even look at the data and counter act what is said, then there is seriously no point here!

I ve explained to you already that warming up doesn't mean the catastrophy you have been claiming will happen in the future. Nowhere near.

No evidence exists the temperature will keep rising in the future because it has risen over the last 200 years on average. It seems your understanding of physics and chemistry are rather poor.

There is no point because no point is made other than the doomsday scenario the woke is making without anything to back it up.

To be fair, woke doesn't understand physics or chemistry or biology either. From carbon dioxide and doomsday scenarios for earth to men who can become women and convert back to men. In case the doomsday comes then you can identify as an octopus and live in the sea where you will probably survive.

i wouldn't say they dumped their climate agenda, nuclear is just a better cleaner option since it can be deployed right away without any gaps in power generation, plus the whole process of making solar panels and wind turbines is pretty dirty, not to mention they both need oil to some extent but nuclear doesn't need it at all.

originally posted by: namehere
i wouldn't say they dumped their climate agenda, nuclear is just a better option since it can be deployed right away without any gaps in power generation, plus the whole process of making solar panels and wind turbines is pretty dirty, not to mention they both need oil to some extent but nuclear doesn't need it at all.

Who is gonna use wind and solar as main sources of power? These are unrealistic ideas with no basis in reality. Fossil fuels and nuclear energy is what covers our energy needs anything else is just propaganda and ideology by the usual suspects.

Yes globle heating is Bad!!
to much SNOW?

"South Africans marvel at snow "
www.bbc.com...

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: namehere
i wouldn't say they dumped their climate agenda, nuclear is just a better option since it can be deployed right away without any gaps in power generation, plus the whole process of making solar panels and wind turbines is pretty dirty, not to mention they both need oil to some extent but nuclear doesn't need it at all.

Who is gonna use wing and solar as main sources of power? These are unrealistic ideas with no basis in reality. Fossil fuels and nuclear energy is what covers our energy needs. The rest is just propaganda by the usual suspects.

if battery storage was better that whole issue wouldn't matter and we would be able to use only solar just fine, such technology is still a few years away though.

originally posted by: namehere

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: namehere
i wouldn't say they dumped their climate agenda, nuclear is just a better option since it can be deployed right away without any gaps in power generation, plus the whole process of making solar panels and wind turbines is pretty dirty, not to mention they both need oil to some extent but nuclear doesn't need it at all.

Who is gonna use wing and solar as main sources of power? These are unrealistic ideas with no basis in reality. Fossil fuels and nuclear energy is what covers our energy needs. The rest is just propaganda by the usual suspects.

if battery storage was better that whole issue wouldn't matter and we would be able to use only solar just fine, such technology is still a few years away though.

Hoe battery storage can become better? What technology is this?

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: TheToastmanCometh

I flunked chemisty. Twice. Can you fill me in like I'm 5?

Don't worry about chemistry.
At least you admit it.

Others pretend they will save the world by advancing their ideologies and convince everyone else the world is coming to an end unless we all abandon the best sources of energy. Pretty much what is responsible for the way we evolved as a technological civilization.