The moment the trans agenda goes off the rails thread

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu
a reply to: quintessentone

If so, that makes them worse than sociopaths. A sociopath doesn't care how other people feel. If they enjoy seeing other people's discomfort then it could be a pathological narcissistic personality disorder.

The last laugh comment context was in maintaining their constitutional rights with Medicaid benefits. You are grasping at straws now and the demonizing of trans people is a sociopathic trait.

There is no constitutional right for a man to parade naked in front of women and girls. Precedent has been established over the course of the country's history that localities have the right to make laws preventing such behavior.

There are no laws preventing transwomen from using women's locker rooms even though in your mind these laws exist.

Women have established civil rights and expectations of privacy and safety. Encroachment upon those civil rights leans into perversion and indecency, of which there are laws and probations on top of general social norms.

But then we have established that these anatomical MEN don't care about women's feelings. This is what makes them sociopaths, best case scenario.

Why are you so excited at the idea of forcing women and girls to shower and strip with adult men?

Why are you so excited to demonize trans people?

I''m not. I feel pity for them. It must be terrible to feel as if you do not belong in your own body. But their feelings are no reason to overturn millenia of decency norms recognized globally by all manners of cultures.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

originally posted by: zosimov
Get back to me when women compete in the NBA MLB NFL etc etc etc.

First they have to defeat 15 year old varsity boy's teams and/or men 10 years retired out of the sport.

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

'Actual scientist?' Your arrogance is astounding.

Any biological scientist (myself included) has the schooling and knowledge to know the differences between the male and female body, the embryonic development, the structural difference in the bones, the hormone levels in the blood, etc.

Seriously, stop before you embarrass yourself even more.

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

'Actual scientist?' Your arrogance is astounding.

Any biological scientist (myself included) has the schooling and knowledge to know the differences between the male and female body, the embryonic development, the structural difference in the bones, the hormone levels in the blood, etc.

Seriously, stop before you embarrass yourself even more.

You who are not even researching the subject matter, I'd say you should be embarrassed for offering nothing but biased opinion.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

'Actual scientist?' Your arrogance is astounding.

Any biological scientist (myself included) has the schooling and knowledge to know the differences between the male and female body, the embryonic development, the structural difference in the bones, the hormone levels in the blood, etc.

Seriously, stop before you embarrass yourself even more.

You who are not even researching the subject matter, I'd say you should be embarrassed for offering nothing but biased opinion.

Dude, we get it. You won't give up. You are invested at this point.

You want to think there is some great mystery between male and female physiology, and no doubt there are a few things we can still learn. But there is no groundbreaking epiphany about giving testosterone to biological women or testosterone blockers to already-developed biological men.

The pendulum has reached it's arc, and slowly swinging back, it's all starting to unravel..good!

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

'Actual scientist?' Your arrogance is astounding.

Any biological scientist (myself included) has the schooling and knowledge to know the differences between the male and female body, the embryonic development, the structural difference in the bones, the hormone levels in the blood, etc.

Seriously, stop before you embarrass yourself even more.

You who are not even researching the subject matter, I'd say you should be embarrassed for offering nothing but biased opinion.

Dude, we get it. You won't give up. You are invested at this point.

You want to think there is some great mystery between male and female physiology, and no doubt there are a few things we can still learn. But there is no groundbreaking epiphany about giving testosterone to biological women or testosterone blockers to already-developed biological men.

I don't follow opinions from anyone not actually doing transgender research. I am invested in truth and science and it appears I am one of a very few number here on this site.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

'Actual scientist?' Your arrogance is astounding.

Any biological scientist (myself included) has the schooling and knowledge to know the differences between the male and female body, the embryonic development, the structural difference in the bones, the hormone levels in the blood, etc.

Seriously, stop before you embarrass yourself even more.

You who are not even researching the subject matter, I'd say you should be embarrassed for offering nothing but biased opinion.

Dude, we get it. You won't give up. You are invested at this point.

You want to think there is some great mystery between male and female physiology, and no doubt there are a few things we can still learn. But there is no groundbreaking epiphany about giving testosterone to biological women or testosterone blockers to already-developed biological men.

I don't follow opinions from anyone not actually doing transgender research. I am invested in truth and science and it appears I am one of a very few number here on this site.

No, you are only interested in conclusions that support your personal beliefs..sorry, that's how most see it.

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

'Actual scientist?' Your arrogance is astounding.

Any biological scientist (myself included) has the schooling and knowledge to know the differences between the male and female body, the embryonic development, the structural difference in the bones, the hormone levels in the blood, etc.

Seriously, stop before you embarrass yourself even more.

You who are not even researching the subject matter, I'd say you should be embarrassed for offering nothing but biased opinion.

Dude, we get it. You won't give up. You are invested at this point.

You want to think there is some great mystery between male and female physiology, and no doubt there are a few things we can still learn. But there is no groundbreaking epiphany about giving testosterone to biological women or testosterone blockers to already-developed biological men.

I don't follow opinions from anyone not actually doing transgender research. I am invested in truth and science and it appears I am one of a very few number here on this site.

No, you are only interested in conclusions that support your personal beliefs..sorry, that's how most see it.

Ha ha. I see it the opposite way, the only difference is I provide actual scientific research sources whereas most of you in opposition provide nadda in the way of science or truth.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

'Actual scientist?' Your arrogance is astounding.

Any biological scientist (myself included) has the schooling and knowledge to know the differences between the male and female body, the embryonic development, the structural difference in the bones, the hormone levels in the blood, etc.

Seriously, stop before you embarrass yourself even more.

You who are not even researching the subject matter, I'd say you should be embarrassed for offering nothing but biased opinion.

Dude, we get it. You won't give up. You are invested at this point.

You want to think there is some great mystery between male and female physiology, and no doubt there are a few things we can still learn. But there is no groundbreaking epiphany about giving testosterone to biological women or testosterone blockers to already-developed biological men.

I don't follow opinions from anyone not actually doing transgender research. I am invested in truth and science and it appears I am one of a very few number here on this site.

Yet you keep talking, even though you are not doing said 'research.'

And by 'research' I actually mean cherry-picking and gas-lighting.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

'Actual scientist?' Your arrogance is astounding.

Any biological scientist (myself included) has the schooling and knowledge to know the differences between the male and female body, the embryonic development, the structural difference in the bones, the hormone levels in the blood, etc.

Seriously, stop before you embarrass yourself even more.

You who are not even researching the subject matter, I'd say you should be embarrassed for offering nothing but biased opinion.

Dude, we get it. You won't give up. You are invested at this point.

You want to think there is some great mystery between male and female physiology, and no doubt there are a few things we can still learn. But there is no groundbreaking epiphany about giving testosterone to biological women or testosterone blockers to already-developed biological men.

I don't follow opinions from anyone not actually doing transgender research. I am invested in truth and science and it appears I am one of a very few number here on this site.

No, you are only interested in conclusions that support your personal beliefs..sorry, that's how most see it.

Ha ha. I see it the opposite way, the only difference is I provide actual scientific research sources whereas most of you in opposition provide nadda in the way of science or truth.

Ya, science is wrong often enough, we can just see whats happening. For example, are you claiming Lia Thomas is a fair match against the women? clearly he has an advantage. How about the trans women weightlifters that absolutely crush their female opponents?

With respect, I think you are intelectually dishonest if you think the examples I provided are fair.

Cheers!

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

'Actual scientist?' Your arrogance is astounding.

Any biological scientist (myself included) has the schooling and knowledge to know the differences between the male and female body, the embryonic development, the structural difference in the bones, the hormone levels in the blood, etc.

Seriously, stop before you embarrass yourself even more.

You who are not even researching the subject matter, I'd say you should be embarrassed for offering nothing but biased opinion.

Dude, we get it. You won't give up. You are invested at this point.

You want to think there is some great mystery between male and female physiology, and no doubt there are a few things we can still learn. But there is no groundbreaking epiphany about giving testosterone to biological women or testosterone blockers to already-developed biological men.

I don't follow opinions from anyone not actually doing transgender research. I am invested in truth and science and it appears I am one of a very few number here on this site.

No, you are only interested in conclusions that support your personal beliefs..sorry, that's how most see it.

Ha ha. I see it the opposite way, the only difference is I provide actual scientific research sources whereas most of you in opposition provide nadda in the way of science or truth.

Ya, science is wrong often enough, we can just see whats happening. For example, are you claiming Lia Thomas is a fair match against the women? clearly he has an advantage.

I don't know the particulars of those people nor have I looked up any research related to this case, so I cannot comment.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

'Actual scientist?' Your arrogance is astounding.

Any biological scientist (myself included) has the schooling and knowledge to know the differences between the male and female body, the embryonic development, the structural difference in the bones, the hormone levels in the blood, etc.

Seriously, stop before you embarrass yourself even more.

You who are not even researching the subject matter, I'd say you should be embarrassed for offering nothing but biased opinion.

Dude, we get it. You won't give up. You are invested at this point.

You want to think there is some great mystery between male and female physiology, and no doubt there are a few things we can still learn. But there is no groundbreaking epiphany about giving testosterone to biological women or testosterone blockers to already-developed biological men.

I don't follow opinions from anyone not actually doing transgender research. I am invested in truth and science and it appears I am one of a very few number here on this site.

No, you are only interested in conclusions that support your personal beliefs..sorry, that's how most see it.

Ha ha. I see it the opposite way, the only difference is I provide actual scientific research sources whereas most of you in opposition provide nadda in the way of science or truth.

Ya, science is wrong often enough, we can just see whats happening. For example, are you claiming Lia Thomas is a fair match against the women? clearly he has an advantage.

I don't know the particulars of those people nor have I looked up any research related to this case, so I cannot comment.

But I thought you were all about the research???..interesting, I added some to my previous post.

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

'Actual scientist?' Your arrogance is astounding.

Any biological scientist (myself included) has the schooling and knowledge to know the differences between the male and female body, the embryonic development, the structural difference in the bones, the hormone levels in the blood, etc.

Seriously, stop before you embarrass yourself even more.

You who are not even researching the subject matter, I'd say you should be embarrassed for offering nothing but biased opinion.

Dude, we get it. You won't give up. You are invested at this point.

You want to think there is some great mystery between male and female physiology, and no doubt there are a few things we can still learn. But there is no groundbreaking epiphany about giving testosterone to biological women or testosterone blockers to already-developed biological men.

I don't follow opinions from anyone not actually doing transgender research. I am invested in truth and science and it appears I am one of a very few number here on this site.

No, you are only interested in conclusions that support your personal beliefs..sorry, that's how most see it.

Ha ha. I see it the opposite way, the only difference is I provide actual scientific research sources whereas most of you in opposition provide nadda in the way of science or truth.

Ya, science is wrong often enough, we can just see whats happening. For example, are you claiming Lia Thomas is a fair match against the women? clearly he has an advantage.

I don't know the particulars of those people nor have I looked up any research related to this case, so I cannot comment.

But I thought you were all about the research???..interesting, I added some to my previous post.

Really, I must have missed because nobody anti-LGBTQ ever adds any sources. I'll have a look then. Sorry I don't see it.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

Blah blah blah blah we need science to determine if boys and girls are different.

lol

Well they determine what is needed not you or anyone else for that matter.

Not in cases where transwomen's testosterone levels catch up to women athletes levels.

Hate to break it to you but science discovered looooooooooooooong ago that boys and girls are different.

Trust the science!

Not where transwomen's testosterone levels drop to match women's levels.

[U]nless you're a biologist, I'd stop right now.

As an actual biologist with 25+ years experience in bio-pharmaceutical manufacturing, I endorse this part of DC's statement.

Of course, you are not working in the exact field of study we are discussing, so come back with an endorsement from an actual scientist working in this field.

'Actual scientist?' Your arrogance is astounding.

Any biological scientist (myself included) has the schooling and knowledge to know the differences between the male and female body, the embryonic development, the structural difference in the bones, the hormone levels in the blood, etc.

Seriously, stop before you embarrass yourself even more.

You who are not even researching the subject matter, I'd say you should be embarrassed for offering nothing but biased opinion.

Dude, we get it. You won't give up. You are invested at this point.

You want to think there is some great mystery between male and female physiology, and no doubt there are a few things we can still learn. But there is no groundbreaking epiphany about giving testosterone to biological women or testosterone blockers to already-developed biological men.

I don't follow opinions from anyone not actually doing transgender research. I am invested in truth and science and it appears I am one of a very few number here on this site.

No, you are only interested in conclusions that support your personal beliefs..sorry, that's how most see it.

Ha ha. I see it the opposite way, the only difference is I provide actual scientific research sources whereas most of you in opposition provide nadda in the way of science or truth.

Ya, science is wrong often enough, we can just see whats happening. For example, are you claiming Lia Thomas is a fair match against the women? clearly he has an advantage.

I don't know the particulars of those people nor have I looked up any research related to this case, so I cannot comment.

But I thought you were all about the research???..interesting, I added some to my previous post.

Really, I must have missed because nobody anti-LGBTQ ever adds any sources. I'll have a look then.

I find it extremely hard to believe someone this invested doesn't know what I'm talking about. I'm not sure if you are an actual person at this point..no offence intended.