The moment the trans agenda goes off the rails thread

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

*shrugs*

I suppose.

We'll see if we live in a free country that values individual rights or an authoritarian state.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

*shrugs*

I suppose.

We'll see if we live in a free country that values individual rights or an authoritarian state.

From what I see it depends on which authoritarian party has it's turn at power. Good luck with that.

Another ban bites the dust.

U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle declared the rules are unconstitutional and violate federal law. That means that all transgender Floridians who qualify for Medicaid should now be able to seek coverage of their gender-affirming care, plaintiff's attorney Simone Chriss told Axios.

Hinkle directed the state to resume coverage of hormone therapy and puberty blockers for the two adult and two minor plaintiffs in the case.
For others seeking care, Medicaid coverage decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis, Chriss said, as is the case with all health procedures.
"Trans people are now subjected to the exact same rules as everyone else," said Chriss, of the Florida-based nonprofit law firm Southern Legal Counsel.

www.axios.com...

This is the Flat Earth theory of sexuality.

Of course, anyone has the right to believe the Earth is Flat and many did back in historical times.

Trangenderism can be traced back to Scotland in it earliest form. Where men dressed in skirts and wore bright colours.
However when questioned none of these men identified as a woman (Apart from Nick Sturgeon)
They also wore makeup and read poetry to each other.

There is a cultural belief in Africa that men dressing as women will ward off evil spirits and stop them being shot as they carry out the duties of the local warlord. Sometimes this backfires on the real women and the soldiers liberating these war torn countries shoot the real women by mistake. This doesnt deter the transrebel from dropping his skirt and manning up as some would say.

On a more serious note, the way to end this madness is to have a man and womens catagory in sport ( oh we do)
We also have a trans catagory and they can thrash it out against each other. I can only imagine how many sub catagories they would demand. It would be a shambles like womens football, but funny to watch.
I'd like to watch the Trans Womens Rugby world cup final.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

*shrugs*

I suppose.

We'll see if we live in a free country that values individual rights or an authoritarian state.

From what I see it depends on which authoritarian party has it's turn at power. Good luck with that.

what does this have to do with underage girls showering next to a fully endowed male?

or athletes with XY biology dominating in womens sports because their chemistry acts like built in steroids?

or uploading videos threatening violence to those who resist the political pressure because their sisters, daughters feel unsafe for obvious reasons?

is that what anti authoritarian means to you?

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

*shrugs*

I suppose.

We'll see if we live in a free country that values individual rights or an authoritarian state.

From what I see it depends on which authoritarian party has it's turn at power. Good luck with that.

what does this have to do with underage girls showering next to a fully endowed male?

or athletes with XY biology dominating in womens sports because their chemistry acts like built in steroids?

or uploading videos threatening violence to those who resist the political pressure because their sisters, daughters feel unsafe for obvious reasons?

is that what anti authoritarian means to you?

It all has to do with that pesky constitution, it appears.

www.axios.com...

a reply to: FawnyKate

that was also my suggestion. A third category of "trans". then the trans women, can compete against the trans men, and it can be all fairzies for everyone. We will never have to hear how biology has any role at all in strength, as the totally fair competition would prove itself in record time. It's a win/win.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

*shrugs*

I suppose.

We'll see if we live in a free country that values individual rights or an authoritarian state.

From what I see it depends on which authoritarian party has it's turn at power. Good luck with that.

what does this have to do with underage girls showering next to a fully endowed male?

or athletes with XY biology dominating in womens sports because their chemistry acts like built in steroids?

or uploading videos threatening violence to those who resist the political pressure because their sisters, daughters feel unsafe for obvious reasons?

is that what anti authoritarian means to you?

It all has to do with that pesky constitution, it appears.

www.axios.com...

medicaid benefits for trans patients has nothing to do with what I asked you

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

*shrugs*

I suppose.

We'll see if we live in a free country that values individual rights or an authoritarian state.

From what I see it depends on which authoritarian party has it's turn at power. Good luck with that.

what does this have to do with underage girls showering next to a fully endowed male?

or athletes with XY biology dominating in womens sports because their chemistry acts like built in steroids?

or uploading videos threatening violence to those who resist the political pressure because their sisters, daughters feel unsafe for obvious reasons?

is that what anti authoritarian means to you?

It all has to do with that pesky constitution, it appears.

www.axios.com...

medicaid benefits for trans patients has nothing to do with what I asked you

It is how the laws are leaning right now towards the constitutional rights of trans people. The constitution trumps feelings, it appears. But if a different party gets power, then everything will be reversed, maybe, it depends on whether or not judges want to be seen as non-partisan or non-political.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

*shrugs*

I suppose.

We'll see if we live in a free country that values individual rights or an authoritarian state.

From what I see it depends on which authoritarian party has it's turn at power. Good luck with that.

what does this have to do with underage girls showering next to a fully endowed male?

or athletes with XY biology dominating in womens sports because their chemistry acts like built in steroids?

or uploading videos threatening violence to those who resist the political pressure because their sisters, daughters feel unsafe for obvious reasons?

is that what anti authoritarian means to you?

It all has to do with that pesky constitution, it appears.

www.axios.com...

medicaid benefits for trans patients has nothing to do with what I asked you

It is how the laws are leaning right now towards the constitutional rights of trans people. The constitution trumps feelings, it appears. But if a different party gets power, then everything will be reversed, maybe, it depends on whether or not judges want to be seen as non-partisan or non-political.

So women's rights aren't being infringed upon, the little gals just have hurt feelings?

lol

Did you honestly post that?

lol

a reply to: DBCowboy

Even funnier is that the only proof trans people offer that they are the opposite gender is that they feel that way.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

*shrugs*

I suppose.

We'll see if we live in a free country that values individual rights or an authoritarian state.

From what I see it depends on which authoritarian party has it's turn at power. Good luck with that.

what does this have to do with underage girls showering next to a fully endowed male?

or athletes with XY biology dominating in womens sports because their chemistry acts like built in steroids?

or uploading videos threatening violence to those who resist the political pressure because their sisters, daughters feel unsafe for obvious reasons?

is that what anti authoritarian means to you?

It all has to do with that pesky constitution, it appears.

www.axios.com...

medicaid benefits for trans patients has nothing to do with what I asked you

It is how the laws are leaning right now towards the constitutional rights of trans people. The constitution trumps feelings, it appears. But if a different party gets power, then everything will be reversed, maybe, it depends on whether or not judges want to be seen as non-partisan or non-political.

So women's rights aren't being infringed upon, the little gals just have hurt feelings?

lol

Did you honestly post that?

lol

Unless women and girls are somehow being attacked then it's just feelz. Anyway, this locker room issue is being dealt with it's just a matter of time before all the YMCAs and YWCAs follow suit.

originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: DBCowboy

Even funnier is that the only proof trans people offer that they are the opposite gender is that they feel that way.

Hold on. . . The Constitution trumps feelings.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

*shrugs*

I suppose.

We'll see if we live in a free country that values individual rights or an authoritarian state.

From what I see it depends on which authoritarian party has it's turn at power. Good luck with that.

what does this have to do with underage girls showering next to a fully endowed male?

or athletes with XY biology dominating in womens sports because their chemistry acts like built in steroids?

or uploading videos threatening violence to those who resist the political pressure because their sisters, daughters feel unsafe for obvious reasons?

is that what anti authoritarian means to you?

It all has to do with that pesky constitution, it appears.

www.axios.com...

medicaid benefits for trans patients has nothing to do with what I asked you

It is how the laws are leaning right now towards the constitutional rights of trans people. The constitution trumps feelings, it appears. But if a different party gets power, then everything will be reversed, maybe, it depends on whether or not judges want to be seen as non-partisan or non-political.

So women's rights aren't being infringed upon, the little gals just have hurt feelings?

lol

Did you honestly post that?

lol

Unless women and girls are somehow being attacked then it's just feelz. Anyway, this locker room issue is being dealt with it's just a matter of time before all the YMCAs and YWCAs follow suit.

So if a naked man is in the girls locker room, the gals should just get over their feelings and bake something?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

*shrugs*

I suppose.

We'll see if we live in a free country that values individual rights or an authoritarian state.

From what I see it depends on which authoritarian party has it's turn at power. Good luck with that.

what does this have to do with underage girls showering next to a fully endowed male?

or athletes with XY biology dominating in womens sports because their chemistry acts like built in steroids?

or uploading videos threatening violence to those who resist the political pressure because their sisters, daughters feel unsafe for obvious reasons?

is that what anti authoritarian means to you?

It all has to do with that pesky constitution, it appears.

www.axios.com...

medicaid benefits for trans patients has nothing to do with what I asked you

It is how the laws are leaning right now towards the constitutional rights of trans people. The constitution trumps feelings, it appears. But if a different party gets power, then everything will be reversed, maybe, it depends on whether or not judges want to be seen as non-partisan or non-political.

So women's rights aren't being infringed upon, the little gals just have hurt feelings?

lol

Did you honestly post that?

lol

Unless women and girls are somehow being attacked then it's just feelz. Anyway, this locker room issue is being dealt with it's just a matter of time before all the YMCAs and YWCAs follow suit.

So if a naked man is in the girls locker room, the gals should just get over their feelings and bake something?

How about they not look at others' genitalia?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: DBCowboy

Even funnier is that the only proof trans people offer that they are the opposite gender is that they feel that way.

Hold on. . . The Constitution trumps feelings.

Hurt feelz is not the same as gender-affirmed bodily and hormonal chemistry changes to a new reality.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

*shrugs*

I suppose.

We'll see if we live in a free country that values individual rights or an authoritarian state.

From what I see it depends on which authoritarian party has it's turn at power. Good luck with that.

what does this have to do with underage girls showering next to a fully endowed male?

or athletes with XY biology dominating in womens sports because their chemistry acts like built in steroids?

or uploading videos threatening violence to those who resist the political pressure because their sisters, daughters feel unsafe for obvious reasons?

is that what anti authoritarian means to you?

It all has to do with that pesky constitution, it appears.

www.axios.com...

medicaid benefits for trans patients has nothing to do with what I asked you

It is how the laws are leaning right now towards the constitutional rights of trans people. The constitution trumps feelings, it appears. But if a different party gets power, then everything will be reversed, maybe, it depends on whether or not judges want to be seen as non-partisan or non-political.

So women's rights aren't being infringed upon, the little gals just have hurt feelings?

lol

Did you honestly post that?

lol

Unless women and girls are somehow being attacked then it's just feelz. Anyway, this locker room issue is being dealt with it's just a matter of time before all the YMCAs and YWCAs follow suit.

So if a naked man is in the girls locker room, the gals should just get over their feelings and bake something?

How about they not look at others' genitalia?

Posting that took some balls.

AAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA-gals don't look-AHAHAHAHAHAHA

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: DBCowboy

Even funnier is that the only proof trans people offer that they are the opposite gender is that they feel that way.

Hold on. . . The Constitution trumps feelings.

Hurt feelz is not the same as gender-affirmed bodily and hormonal chemistry changes to a new reality.

There is no "new reality".

There is only reality.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SigmaXSquared

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

The outrage is for men who have not undergone 'bottom surgery' who think they should be able to expose themselves in women's locker rooms and showers. It shouldn't matter how those men think about themselves or not. The personal feelings of one person should not overrule the feelings of an entire group of people.

And ponder this:

If an unaltered man truly feels that he is a woman, then he should understand the discomfort his exposed penis will create in a shower or locker room.

If he does not understand the discomfort, then how can he say he feels like a woman?

If he does understand the discomfort and does not care, or thinks his feelings are more important that all the women he exposes himself to, then he lacks empathy and/or is a sociopath.

If he lack empathy or is a sociopath, how can he say he feels like a woman?

Where are the stats that these unaltered transwomen, down there, are attacking women in locker rooms? Where are any stats that unaltered transwomen are attacking women at all?

Heh, controlling the narrative. . .

A naked man in a womans locker room is an assault without any acts of violence.

It's an assault on privacy, etc.

Well discrimination trumps your infringement on you privacy it would appear. Take it up with your leaders.

No.

Nothing trumps individual rights.

Anything else is authoritarian.

Well, it is playing out in the courtrooms right now for all to see.

*shrugs*

I suppose.

We'll see if we live in a free country that values individual rights or an authoritarian state.

From what I see it depends on which authoritarian party has it's turn at power. Good luck with that.

what does this have to do with underage girls showering next to a fully endowed male?

or athletes with XY biology dominating in womens sports because their chemistry acts like built in steroids?

or uploading videos threatening violence to those who resist the political pressure because their sisters, daughters feel unsafe for obvious reasons?

is that what anti authoritarian means to you?

It all has to do with that pesky constitution, it appears.

www.axios.com...

medicaid benefits for trans patients has nothing to do with what I asked you

It is how the laws are leaning right now towards the constitutional rights of trans people. The constitution trumps feelings, it appears. But if a different party gets power, then everything will be reversed, maybe, it depends on whether or not judges want to be seen as non-partisan or non-political.

So women's rights aren't being infringed upon, the little gals just have hurt feelings?

lol

Did you honestly post that?

lol

Unless women and girls are somehow being attacked then it's just feelz. Anyway, this locker room issue is being dealt with it's just a matter of time before all the YMCAs and YWCAs follow suit.

So if a naked man is in the girls locker room, the gals should just get over their feelings and bake something?

How about they not look at others' genitalia?

Posting that took some balls.

AAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA-gals don't look-AHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yeah, but the trans people are getting the last laugh now aren't they?